1st Unit of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Italy.
World J Emerg Surg. 2010 Dec 28;5:29. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-5-29.
Obstructive left colon carcinoma (OLCC) is a challenging matter in terms of obstruction release as well of oncological issues. Several options are available and no guidelines are established. The paper aims to generate evidenced based recommendations on management of OLCC.
The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were queried for publications focusing on OLCC published prior to April 2010. A extensive retrieval, analyses, and grading of the literature was undertaken. The findings of the research were presented and largely discussed among panellist and audience at the Consensus Conference of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) and Peritoneum and Surgery (PnS) Society held in Bologna July 2010. Comparisons of techniques are presented and final committee recommendation are enounced.
Hartmann's procedure should be preferred to loop colostomy (Grade 2B). Hartmann's procedure offers no survival benefit compared to segmental colonic resection with primary anastomosis (Grade 2C+); Hartmann's procedure should be considered in patients with high surgical risk (Grade 2C). Total colectomy and segmental colectomy with intraoperative colonic irrigation are associated with same mortality/morbidity, however total colectomy is associated with higher rates impaired bowel function (Grade 1A). Segmental resection and primary anastomosis either with manual decompression or intraoperative colonic irrigation are associated with same mortality/morbidity rate (Grade 1A). In palliation stent placement is associated with similar mortality/morbidity rates and shorter hospital stay (Grade 2B). Stents as a bridge to surgery seems associated with lower mortality rate, shorter hospital stay, and a lower colostomy formation rate (Grade 1B).
Loop colostomy and staged procedure should be adopted in case of dramatic scenario, when neoadjuvant therapy could be expected. Hartmann's procedure should be performed in case of high risk of anastomotic dehiscence. Subtotal and total colectomy should be attempted when cecal perforation or in case of synchronous colonic neoplasm. Primary resection and anastomosis with manual decompression seems the procedure of choice. Colonic stents represent the best option when skills are available. The literature power is relatively poor and the existing RCT are often not sufficiently robust in design thus, among 6 possible treatment modalities, only 2 reached the Grade A.
左结肠癌性梗阻(OLCC)在梗阻解除和肿瘤学问题方面都是一个具有挑战性的问题。有多种选择,但是没有既定的指南。本文旨在针对 OLCC 的治疗提供循证建议。
在 2010 年 4 月之前,我们在 PubMed 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中检索了有关 OLCC 的出版物。我们进行了广泛的检索、分析和文献评估。研究结果在 2010 年 7 月于博洛尼亚举行的世界急诊外科学会(WSES)和腹膜与外科学会(PnS)共识会议上展示,并在与会者和听众中进行了广泛的讨论。我们介绍了技术比较,并公布了最终的委员会建议。
与结肠袢式造口术相比,Hartmann 手术应作为首选(2B 级)。与一期结直肠切除吻合术相比,Hartmann 手术并不增加患者的生存率(2C 级);对于高手术风险的患者,应考虑行 Hartmann 手术(2C 级)。全结肠切除术和术中结肠灌洗的节段性结肠切除术具有相同的死亡率/发病率,但全结肠切除术与更高的肠功能受损率相关(1A 级)。节段性切除和一期吻合术,无论是手动减压还是术中结肠灌洗,都具有相同的死亡率/发病率(1A 级)。姑息性支架置入术与相似的死亡率/发病率和较短的住院时间相关(2B 级)。支架作为手术的桥梁似乎与较低的死亡率、较短的住院时间和较低的结肠造口形成率相关(1B 级)。
在预期新辅助治疗的情况下,应采用结肠袢式造口术和分期手术。在吻合口裂开风险较高的情况下,应行 Hartmann 手术。当盲肠穿孔或同时存在结肠肿瘤时,应尝试进行次全和全结肠切除术。手动减压的一期切除吻合似乎是首选的手术方式。在有技术条件的情况下,结肠支架是最佳选择。文献的说服力相对较差,现有的 RCT 设计往往不够稳健,因此,在 6 种可能的治疗方法中,只有 2 种达到了 A 级。