Riad W, Abboud E, Al-Harthi E, Kahtani E, Ahmed N
Department of Anesthesiology King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;4(3):174-7. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.71346.
Needle length plays an important role for the success of ophthalmic block. The standard practice is to use 25 mm needles length; however, unnecessarily long needles may increase the risk of complications especially in the presence of staphyloma or previous scleral buckle.
This work was designed to compare the efficacy of using 15 and 25 mm needle in performing extraconal block for patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery.
Prospective randomized double blinded study.
A total of 120 patients were enrolled in this study and were divided in two groups. In group (1) extraconal block was performed using 25 mm needle, while in group (2) 15 mm needle was used. After primary injection, assessment of the block was done by an anesthesiologist who was unaware of the needle used. If satisfactory akinesia was not achieved a supplementation was provided. At the end of the procedures, patients and surgeons were asked to assess their pain and satisfaction with the anesthetic technique.
The sample size calculation using N-Quary version 4. Numerical and categorical data were analyzed using an independent sample, a two-tailed t-test, and chi-square test, respectively.
The volume of primary injectable was significantly higher in group 2. The two groups were comparable as regards total volume of local anesthetic, supplementation rate, akinesia, pain score, and surgeon satisfaction.
Using 15 mm needle length to perform extraconal blockade for posterior segment procedures is equally effective to 25 mm needle.
针的长度对眼科阻滞的成功起着重要作用。标准做法是使用25毫米长的针;然而,针过长可能会增加并发症的风险,尤其是在存在葡萄肿或既往巩膜扣带术的情况下。
本研究旨在比较使用15毫米和25毫米针为接受玻璃体视网膜手术的患者进行锥外阻滞的效果。
前瞻性随机双盲研究。
本研究共纳入120例患者,分为两组。第1组使用25毫米针进行锥外阻滞,而第2组使用15毫米针。初次注射后,由不知道所使用针的麻醉医生对阻滞效果进行评估。如果未达到满意的运动不能,则进行补充注射。手术结束时,要求患者和外科医生评估他们对麻醉技术的疼痛感受和满意度。
使用N-Quary版本4进行样本量计算。数值数据和分类数据分别使用独立样本、双尾t检验和卡方检验进行分析。
第2组初次可注射量显著更高。两组在局部麻醉剂总量、补充率、运动不能、疼痛评分和外科医生满意度方面具有可比性。
使用15毫米长的针为后节手术进行锥外阻滞与使用25毫米针同样有效。