Ruhe Mary C, Bobiak Sarah N, Litaker David, Carter Caroline A, Wu Laura, Schroeder Casey, Zyzanski Stephen J, Weyer Sharon M, Werner James J, Fry Ronald E, Stange Kurt C
Department of Family Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Qual Manag Health Care. 2011 Jan-Mar;20(1):37-48. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0b013e31820311be.
To test the effect of an Appreciative Inquiry (AI) quality improvement strategy on clinical quality management and practice development outcomes. Appreciative inquiry enables the discovery of shared motivations, envisioning a transformed future, and learning around the implementation of a change process.
Thirty diverse primary care practices were randomly assigned to receive an AI-based intervention focused on a practice-chosen topic and on improving preventive service delivery (PSD) rates. Medical-record review assessed change in PSD rates. Ethnographic field notes and observational checklist analysis used editing and immersion/crystallization methods to identify factors affecting intervention implementation and practice development outcomes.
The PSD rates did not change. Field note analysis suggested that the intervention elicited core motivations, facilitated development of a shared vision, defined change objectives, and fostered respectful interactions. Practices most likely to implement the intervention or develop new practice capacities exhibited 1 or more of the following: support from key leader(s), a sense of urgency for change, a mission focused on serving patients, health care system and practice flexibility, and a history of constructive practice change.
An AI approach and enabling practice conditions can lead to intervention implementation and practice development by connecting individual and practice strengths and motivations to the change objective.
测试赏识性探询(AI)质量改进策略对临床质量管理和实践发展成果的影响。赏识性探询有助于发现共同的动机,设想一个转变后的未来,并围绕变革过程的实施进行学习。
30个不同的初级保健机构被随机分配,接受一项基于AI的干预措施,该措施聚焦于机构选定的主题以及提高预防服务提供(PSD)率。病历审查评估PSD率的变化。人种志田野笔记和观察清单分析采用编辑和沉浸/结晶方法,以确定影响干预实施和实践发展成果的因素。
PSD率没有变化。田野笔记分析表明,该干预激发了核心动机,促进了共同愿景的形成,明确了变革目标,并促进了相互尊重的互动。最有可能实施干预或发展新实践能力的机构表现出以下1种或更多特征:得到关键领导者的支持、有变革的紧迫感、以服务患者为重点的使命、医疗保健系统和实践的灵活性,以及有建设性实践变革的历史。
AI方法和有利的实践条件可以通过将个人和机构的优势及动机与变革目标联系起来,从而实现干预的实施和机构的发展。