Laboratory of Phytochemical Analysis, Dipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Via Pietro Giuria 9, I-10125 Torino, Italy.
J Chromatogr A. 2011 Feb 11;1218(6):753-62. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
The study compares standard addition (SA), stable isotope dilution assay (SIDA) and multiple headspace extraction (MHE) as methods to quantify furan and 2-methyl-furan in roasted coffee with HS-SPME-GC-MS, using CAR-PDMS as fibre coating, d(4)-furan as internal standard and in-fibre internal standardization with n-undecane to check the fibre reliability. The results on about 150 samples calculated with the three quantitation approaches were all very satisfactory, with coefficient of variation (CV) versus the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) method, taken as reference, almost always below the arbitrarily-fixed limit of 15%. Furan was detected in the 1-5 ppm range, 2-methyl-furan in the 4-20 ppm range. Moreover, experimental exponential slopes (Q) and linearity (r) of both furan and 2-methyl-furan MHE regression equation on 50 samples were very similar thus making possible to use the same average Q value for all samples of the investigated set and their quantitation with a single determination. This makes this approach very rapid and competitive in-time with SA and SIDA. A non-separative method (HS-SPME-MS) was also developed in view of possible application on-line monitoring of furan and 2-methyl-furan in a pilot-plant with the aim of optimizing the roasting process to reduce these compounds to a minimum. Sampling times of 20 and 5 min were tested, the latter enabling total analysis time to be reduced to about 9 min. The results on 105 samples with both SIDA and MHE approaches were again highly satisfactory most of the samples giving a CV% versus the conventional methods below 20%. In this case too average Q values for both furan and 2-methyl-furan were used for MHE. The separative method presented very good repeatability (RSD% always below 10%) and intermediate precision over three months (RSD% always below 15%); performance were similar for the non-separative method, with repeatability (RSD%) always below 12% and intermediate precision over three months (RSD%) always below 15%. The sensitivity of both separative and non-separative methods was also very good, LOD and LOQ being in the ppb range for both furan and 2-methyl-furan, i.e. well below the amounts present in the roasted coffee samples.
该研究比较了标准加入法(SA)、稳定同位素稀释分析(SIDA)和多顶空萃取(MHE)作为使用 HS-SPME-GC-MS 定量测定烤咖啡中呋喃和 2-甲基呋喃的方法,采用 CAR-PDMS 作为纤维涂层,d(4)-呋喃作为内标,采用正十一烷进行纤维内标化以检查纤维的可靠性。使用这三种定量方法对约 150 个样品进行计算的结果都非常令人满意,与作为参考的美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)方法相比,变异系数(CV)几乎总是低于 15%的任意固定限值。呋喃的检测范围为 1-5ppm,2-甲基呋喃的检测范围为 4-20ppm。此外,在 50 个样品上进行的呋喃和 2-甲基呋喃 MHE 回归方程的实验指数斜率(Q)和线性(r)非常相似,从而可以对研究组的所有样品使用相同的平均 Q 值进行定量,并进行单次测定。这使得这种方法非常快速,与 SA 和 SIDA 相比具有竞争力。还开发了一种非分离方法(HS-SPME-MS),以便在中试工厂中对呋喃和 2-甲基呋喃进行在线监测,旨在优化烘焙过程以将这些化合物降至最低。测试了 20 分钟和 5 分钟的采样时间,后者将总分析时间缩短至约 9 分钟。使用 SIDA 和 MHE 方法对 105 个样品进行的测试结果再次非常令人满意,大多数样品的 CV%与传统方法相比低于 20%。在这种情况下,MHE 也使用了呋喃和 2-甲基呋喃的平均 Q 值。分离方法的重复性非常好(RSD%始终低于 10%),三个月内的中间精密度(RSD%始终低于 15%);非分离方法的性能也相似,重复性(RSD%)始终低于 12%,三个月内的中间精密度(RSD%)始终低于 15%。两种分离和非分离方法的灵敏度也非常好,呋喃和 2-甲基呋喃的 LOQ 和 LOQ 均在 ppb 范围内,远低于烤咖啡样品中的含量。