Santos Rogério Lacerda dos, Pithon Matheus Melo, Martins Fernanda Otaviano, Romanos Maria Teresa Villela, Ruellas Antônio Carlos de Oliveira
Departament of Orthodontics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2010;21(3):205-10. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402010000300005.
This study investigated the cytotoxicity exists between latex and non-latex Orthodontic elastomeric ligatures. Six elastomeric ligatures (1 latex, 2 latex-free and 3 polyurethane) from different manufacturers were divided into 6 groups of 15 elastics each: A (Latex-free, American Orthodontics), M (Polyurethane, Morelli), G (Polyurethane,GAC International), Te (Polyurethane, Tecnident), TP (Natural latex,TP Orthodontics) and U (Latex-free,3M Unitek). The cytotoxicity assay was performed using cell cultures (L929 mouse fibroblast cell line), which were subjected to the cell viability test with neutral red ("dye-uptake") at 1, 2, 3, 7 and 28 days. Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). No statistically significant differences (p>0.05) were observed between Groups M and Te in all experimental periods, except at 2 days. No significant differences (p>0.05) in cell viability were found either among Groups A, G, TP and U or between Groups M and Te at 24 h or among Groups CC, A, G, TP and U at 2 and 28 days. It may be concluded that latex-free elastomeric ligatures from American Orthodontics and Unitek trademarks induced less cell lysis compared to latex and polyurethane ligatures.
本研究调查了乳胶和非乳胶正畸弹性结扎圈之间的细胞毒性。来自不同制造商的六种弹性结扎圈(1种乳胶、2种无乳胶和3种聚氨酯)被分为6组,每组15个弹性结扎圈:A组(无乳胶,美国正畸公司)、M组(聚氨酯,莫雷利公司)、G组(聚氨酯,GAC国际公司)、Te组(聚氨酯,泰克尼登特公司)、TP组(天然乳胶,TP正畸公司)和U组(无乳胶,3M Unitek公司)。使用细胞培养物(L929小鼠成纤维细胞系)进行细胞毒性试验,在第1、2、3、7和28天用中性红进行细胞活力测试(“染料摄取”)。数据通过方差分析和Tukey检验进行统计学分析(α=0.05)。除第2天外,在所有实验期内,M组和Te组之间未观察到统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。在24小时时,A组、G组、TP组和U组之间,以及M组和Te组之间,在第2天和第28天CC组、A组、G组、TP组和U组之间,细胞活力均未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。可以得出结论,与乳胶和聚氨酯结扎圈相比,美国正畸公司和3M Unitek公司的无乳胶弹性结扎圈诱导的细胞裂解较少。