• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体积累的异质风险解释了贫困社区内围产期不平等现象。

Individual accumulation of heterogeneous risks explains perinatal inequalities within deprived neighbourhoods.

机构信息

The Generation R Study Group, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, POB 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;26(2):165-80. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9542-5. Epub 2011 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10654-010-9542-5
PMID:21203801
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3043261/
Abstract

Dutch' figures on perinatal mortality and morbidity are poor compared to EU-standards. Considerable within-country differences have been reported too, with decreased perinatal health in deprived urban areas. We investigated associations between perinatal risk factors and adverse perinatal outcomes in 7,359 pregnant women participating in population-based prospective cohort study, to establish the independent role, if any, for living within a deprived urban neighbourhood. Main outcome measures included perinatal death, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), prematurity, congenital malformations, Apgar at 5 min < 7, and pre-eclampsia. Information regarding individual risk factors was obtained from questionnaires, physical examinations, ultrasounds, biological samples, and medical records. The dichotomous Dutch deprivation indicator was additionally used to test for unexplained deprived urban area effects. Pregnancies from a deprived neighbourhood had an increased risk for perinatal death (RR 1.8, 95% CI [1.1; 3.1]). IUGR, prematurity, Apgar at 5 min < 7, and pre-eclampsia also showed higher prevalences (P < 0.05). Residing within a deprived neighbourhood was associated with increased prevalence of all measured risk factors. Regression analysis showed that the observed neighbourhood related differences in perinatal outcomes could be attributed to the increased risk factor prevalence only, without a separated role for living within a deprived neighbourhood. Women from a deprived neighbourhood had significantly more 'possibly avoidable' risk factors. To conclude, women from a socioeconomically deprived neighbourhood are at an increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Differences regarding possibly avoidable risk factors imply that preventive strategies may prove effective.

摘要

与欧盟标准相比,荷兰的围产儿死亡率和发病率数据较差。也有报道称,国内存在相当大的差异,贫困城市地区的围产儿健康状况下降。我们在一项基于人群的前瞻性队列研究中,调查了 7359 名孕妇的围产儿危险因素与不良围产儿结局之间的关系,以确定生活在贫困城市社区是否存在独立的作用。主要结局指标包括围产儿死亡、宫内生长受限(IUGR)、早产、先天性畸形、5 分钟 Apgar 评分<7 分和子痫前期。个体危险因素的信息通过问卷调查、体格检查、超声检查、生物样本和病历获得。此外,还使用二分类荷兰贫困指标来检验无法解释的贫困城市地区效应。来自贫困社区的妊娠有更高的围产儿死亡风险(RR 1.8,95%CI [1.1; 3.1])。IUGR、早产、5 分钟 Apgar 评分<7 分和子痫前期的患病率也更高(P<0.05)。居住在贫困社区与所有测量的危险因素的患病率增加有关。回归分析表明,观察到的围产儿结局与社区相关的差异可以归因于危险因素患病率的增加,而与生活在贫困社区无关。来自贫困社区的女性有更多的“可能可以避免的”危险因素。总之,来自社会经济贫困社区的女性有更高的不良妊娠结局风险。可能可以避免的危险因素差异表明,预防策略可能有效。

相似文献

1
Individual accumulation of heterogeneous risks explains perinatal inequalities within deprived neighbourhoods.个体积累的异质风险解释了贫困社区内围产期不平等现象。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;26(2):165-80. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9542-5. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
2
[Perinatal outcomes in the four largest cities and in deprived neighbourhoods in The Netherlands].[荷兰四大城市及贫困社区的围产期结局]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Dec 13;152(50):2734-40.
3
Differences in perinatal morbidity and mortality on the neighbourhood level in Dutch municipalities: a population based cohort study.荷兰各市镇社区层面围产期发病率和死亡率的差异:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 2;15:201. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0628-7.
4
Persisting inequalities in birth outcomes related to neighbourhood deprivation.与社区贫困相关的出生结果持续存在不平等现象。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Mar;74(3):232-239. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213162. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
5
Living in deprived urban districts increases perinatal health inequalities.生活在贫困的城市地区会加剧围产期健康不平等现象。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Mar;26(5):473-81. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.735722. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
6
Social deprivation and adverse perinatal outcomes among Western and non-Western pregnant women in a Dutch urban population.社会剥夺与荷兰城市人口中外来与非外来孕产妇女的不良围产结局
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Apr;83:42-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
7
The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome.定制和使用胎儿生长标准对出生体重百分位与不良围产结局之间的关系的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S738-S744. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.563. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
8
Pregnancy outcomes in asylum seekers in the North of the Netherlands: a retrospective documentary analysis.荷兰北部寻求庇护者的妊娠结局:回顾性文献分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 25;20(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02985-x.
9
Deprived neighborhoods and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.贫困社区与不良围产期结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Aug;93(8):727-40. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12430. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
10
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies conceived via assisted reproductive technology complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.辅助生殖技术受孕的单胎妊娠合并妊娠期糖尿病的产科及围生期结局:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 14;18(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2115-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Perinatal Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Cardiovascular Comorbidities: National and State-Level Results of a Novel Cardio-Obstetrics Program.围产期社会经济劣势与心血管合并症:一项新型心脏产科项目的国家和州层面结果
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Aug 13;12(8):307. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12080307.
2
Association Between Patient-Reported Social Needs and Birth Outcomes After Implementation of Universal Screening.实施普遍筛查后患者报告的社会需求与出生结局之间的关联
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 22;146(1):138-146. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005942.
3
Integrated care for multi-domain vulnerability during pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Anonymous non-response analysis in the ABCD cohort study enabled by probabilistic record linkage.基于概率记录链接的 ABCD 队列研究中的匿名无应答分析。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 May;23(3):264-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01030.x. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
2
The effect of neighbourhood income and deprivation on pregnancy outcomes in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.荷兰阿姆斯特丹社区收入和贫困程度对妊娠结局的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Sep;63(9):755-60. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.080408.
3
Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.
孕期多领域脆弱性的综合护理:一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2025 Jan 17. doi: 10.1007/s00737-024-01554-x.
4
Area Poverty and Adverse Birth Outcomes: An Opportunity for Quality Improvement.地区贫困与不良出生结局:质量改进的契机。
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb 1;145(2):231-240. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005809. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
5
Improving integrated care for (future) parents facing vulnerable circumstances in the early life course of their (future) child: An action research protocol.改善面临脆弱处境的(未来)父母在其(未来)子女生命早期阶段的综合照护:一项行动研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 31;19(10):e0305557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305557. eCollection 2024.
6
Building Cross-sectoral Collaborations to Address Perinatal Health Inequities: Insights From the Dutch Healthy Pregnancy 4 All-3 Program.建立跨部门合作以解决围产期健康不平等问题:荷兰“健康妊娠惠及所有人”项目的经验。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8115. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8115. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
7
Stimulating Preconception Care Uptake by Women With a Vulnerable Health Status Through a Mobile Health App (Pregnant Faster): Pilot Feasibility Study.通过移动健康应用程序(更快怀孕)激发健康状况脆弱的女性接受孕前保健:初步可行性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 22;11:e53614. doi: 10.2196/53614.
8
Do women living in a deprived neighborhood have higher maternity care costs and worse pregnancy outcomes? A retrospective population-based study.生活在贫困社区的女性是否会有更高的生育护理费用和更差的妊娠结局?一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 20;24(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10737-2.
9
Deprived areas and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review.贫困地区与不良围产期结局:一项系统综述。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1205-1218. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07300-5. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
10
Stimulating the Uptake of Preconception Care by Women With a Vulnerable Health Status Through mHealth App-Based Nudging (Pregnant Faster): Cocreation Design and Protocol for a Cohort Study.通过基于移动健康应用程序的助推措施促进健康状况脆弱的女性接受孕前保健(更快怀孕):队列研究的共同设计与方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 9;12:e45293. doi: 10.2196/45293.
流行病学和临床研究中缺失数据的多重填补:潜力与陷阱
BMJ. 2009 Jun 29;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393.
4
Decreasing perinatal mortality in The Netherlands, 2000-2006: a record linkage study.荷兰 2000-2006 年围产儿死亡率的降低:一项记录链接研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009 Sep;63(9):761-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.080440. Epub 2009 May 4.
5
Neighbourhood deprivation and small-for-gestational-age term births in the United States.美国邻里贫困与足月小样儿出生情况
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;23(1):87-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00991.x.
6
[Perinatal outcomes in the four largest cities and in deprived neighbourhoods in The Netherlands].[荷兰四大城市及贫困社区的围产期结局]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Dec 13;152(50):2734-40.
7
The Generation R Study: design and cohort update until the age of 4 years.Generation R研究:设计及队列更新至4岁时情况
Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(12):801-11. doi: 10.1007/s10654-008-9309-4. Epub 2008 Dec 20.
8
The clinical content of preconception care: preconception care for special populations.孕前保健的临床内容:特殊人群的孕前保健
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;199(6 Suppl 2):S384-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.019.
9
[Perinatal mortality in The Netherlands: an audit is now more necessary than ever].[荷兰的围产期死亡率:现在比以往任何时候都更有必要进行一次审计]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Mar 15;152(11):603-5.
10
Who are we missing? Area deprivation and survey participation.我们遗漏了谁?地区贫困与调查参与情况。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(6):379-87. doi: 10.1007/s10654-008-9248-0. Epub 2008 Apr 12.