University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1414, Houston Texas 77030, USA.
Oncologist. 2011;16(1):105-11. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0161. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
Palliative care consultation services are now available in the majority of cancer centers, yet most referrals to palliative care occur late. We previously found that the term "palliative care" was perceived by oncology professionals as a barrier to early patient referral. We aimed to determine whether a service name change to supportive care was associated with earlier referrals.
Records of 4,701 consecutive patients with a first palliative care consultation before (January 2006 to August 2007) and after (January 2008 to August 2009) the name change were analyzed, including demographics and dates of first registration to hospital, advanced cancer diagnosis, palliative care consultation, and death. One-sample proportions tests, median tests, χ(2) tests, and log-rank tests were used to identify group differences.
The median age was 59 years, 50% were male, and 90% had solid tumors. After the name change, we found: (a) a 41% greater number of palliative care consultations (1,950 versus 2,751 patients; p < .001), mainly as a result of a rise in inpatient referrals (733 versus 1,451 patients; p < .001), and (b) in the outpatient setting, a shorter duration from hospital registration to palliative care consultation (median, 9.2 months versus 13.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; p < .001) and from advanced cancer diagnosis to palliative care consultation (5.2 months versus 6.9 months; HR, 0.82; p < .001), and a longer overall survival duration from palliative care consultation (median 6.2 months versus 4.7 months; HR, 1.21; p < .001).
The name change to supportive care was associated with more inpatient referrals and earlier referrals in the outpatient setting. The outpatient setting facilitates earlier access to supportive/palliative care and should be established in more centers.
现在大多数癌症中心都提供姑息治疗咨询服务,但大多数姑息治疗的转诊发生得很晚。我们之前发现,肿瘤专业人员认为“姑息治疗”这个术语是早期患者转诊的障碍。我们旨在确定将服务名称更改为支持性护理是否与更早的转诊相关。
分析了 4701 例首次姑息治疗咨询的连续患者记录,这些患者分为名称更改前(2006 年 1 月至 2007 年 8 月)和更改后(2008 年 1 月至 2009 年 8 月)两组,包括人口统计学特征和首次入院、晚期癌症诊断、姑息治疗咨询和死亡日期。使用单样本比例检验、中位数检验、卡方检验和对数秩检验来确定组间差异。
中位年龄为 59 岁,50%为男性,90%为实体瘤。名称更改后,我们发现:(a)姑息治疗咨询的数量增加了 41%(1950 例患者比 2751 例患者;p<0.001),主要是由于住院转诊增加(733 例患者比 1451 例患者;p<0.001),(b)在门诊环境中,从入院到姑息治疗咨询的时间更短(中位数,9.2 个月比 13.2 个月;风险比[HR],0.85;p<0.001),从晚期癌症诊断到姑息治疗咨询的时间更短(5.2 个月比 6.9 个月;HR,0.82;p<0.001),从姑息治疗咨询到总生存时间的时间更长(中位数 6.2 个月比 4.7 个月;HR,1.21;p<0.001)。
将名称更改为支持性护理与更多的住院转诊和门诊环境中的更早转诊相关。门诊环境更有利于更早获得支持性/姑息治疗,应该在更多的中心建立。