Suppr超能文献

颈椎间盘置换与融合术后邻近节段活动度的评估:1 年随机对照研究结果。

Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year's results.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgical Department, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):934-41. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1588-2. Epub 2011 Jan 8.

Abstract

Disc prostheses have been designed to restore and maintain cervical segmental motion and reduce the accelerated degeneration of the adjacent level. There is no knowledge about the reaction of the neighboured asymptomatic segments after implantation of prostheses or fusion. The effects of these procedures to segmental movement of the uninvolved vertebrae have not been subjected to studies so far. The objective of this study was to compare the segmental motion following cervical disc replacement versus fusion and the correlation to the clinical outcome. Another aim was to compare the segmental motion of the asymptomatic segments above the treated ones and to compare both with Roentgen stereometric analysis (RSA) including the asymptomatic segments. 20 patients with one-level cervical radiculopathy scheduled for surgery were randomized to arthroplasty (10 patients, study group) or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (10 patients, control group). Clinical results were evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale and Neck Disability Index. RSA was performed immediately postoperative, after 6 and 12 months. The adjacent segment showed a significantly higher segmental motion in all three-dimensional axes in comparison to the segment treated with prostheses (P < 0.05). In the fusion group the segmental motion of the adjacent segment was significantly higher in all three-dimensional axes (P < 0.05) at each examination time. When the adjacent level of both groups is compared, the fusion group could show a higher segmental motion in all three-dimensional axes, but without significant difference (P > 0.05) 1 year after surgery. Regarding the clinical results, there was no significant difference in pain relief between both groups (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the adjacent segment could show a higher segmental motion, when compared with the segment either treated with prostheses or fusion. There was no significant difference in segmental motion adjacent to prosthesis or fusion. Clinical results did also show no significant difference in pain relief between both groups.

摘要

人工椎间盘被设计用于恢复和维持颈椎节段运动,并减少相邻节段的加速退化。对于植入假体或融合后相邻无症状节段的反应,目前还没有相关知识。到目前为止,还没有研究这些手术对未受累椎体节段运动的影响。本研究的目的是比较颈椎间盘置换与融合后的节段运动,并与临床结果相关联。另一个目的是比较治疗节段上方无症状节段的节段运动,并将其与包括无症状节段的 X 线体层融合分析(RSA)进行比较。20 例拟行手术治疗的单节段颈椎病患者随机分为关节成形术(10 例,研究组)或前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(10 例,对照组)。采用视觉模拟评分和颈部残疾指数评估临床结果。术后即刻、术后 6 个月和 12 个月进行 RSA 检查。相邻节段在所有三维轴上的节段运动均明显高于假体治疗节段(P<0.05)。在融合组中,相邻节段在所有三维轴上的节段运动在每个检查时间均显著升高(P<0.05)。当比较两组的相邻水平时,融合组在所有三个三维轴上都可以显示更高的节段运动,但在术后 1 年没有显著差异(P>0.05)。关于临床结果,两组在缓解疼痛方面没有显著差异(P>0.05)。总之,与假体或融合治疗的节段相比,相邻节段的节段运动可能更高。假体或融合相邻节段的运动没有显著差异。临床结果也显示两组在缓解疼痛方面没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year's results.
Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):934-41. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1588-2. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
2
Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
4
Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study.
Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):423-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0226-5. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
6
Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778.
7
Is the behavior of disc replacement adjacent to fusion affected by the location of the fused level in hybrid surgery?
Spine J. 2018 Dec;18(12):2171-2180. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.04.019. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
8
Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Mar;22(3):237-45. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131089. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
10
Segmental kinematics and adjacent level degeneration following disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with three years of follow-up.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2007;17(3):229-36. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v17.i3.60.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjacent segment mobility after ACDF considering fusion status at the implant insertion site.
Eur Spine J. 2023 May;32(5):1616-1623. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07634-3. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
2
Anterior Approach to the Cervical Spine: Elegance Lies in Its Simplicity.
Asian J Neurosurg. 2021 Dec 18;16(4):669-684. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_313_20. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
4
Adverse Events Following Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
Global Spine J. 2018 Apr;8(2):178-189. doi: 10.1177/2192568217720681. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
5
Impact of T1 slope on surgical and adjacent segment degeneration after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Aug 29;13:1119-1125. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S138990. eCollection 2017.
6
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical arthroplasty for the management of cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis.
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):998-1008. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4779-7. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
10
Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?
Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24 Suppl 7:810-25. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4258-6. Epub 2015 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The ProDisc-C prosthesis: clinical and radiological experience 1 year after surgery.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Aug 15;32(18):1935-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31813162d8.
2
Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study.
Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):423-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0226-5. Epub 2006 Nov 14.
3
Complications with cervical arthroplasty.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2006 Feb;4(2):98-105. doi: 10.3171/spi.2006.4.2.98.
5
Congenital cervical block vertebrae are associated with caudally adjacent discs.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2005 Aug;20(7):669-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.04.006.
6
Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Apr;2(4):403-10. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.4.0403.
7
Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004 Apr;17(2):79-85. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200404000-00001.
8
Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Jun 1;29(11):E221-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200406010-00022.
10
Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Dec 15;28(24):2673-8. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验