文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎人工关节置换术治疗颈椎病的Meta分析

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical arthroplasty for the management of cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ma Zhuo, Ma Xun, Yang Huilin, Guan Xiaoming, Li Xiang

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences & Shanxi DaYi Hospital, No. 99 Long Cheng Street, Taiyuan, 030032, Shanxi Province, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 899 Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):998-1008. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4779-7. Epub 2016 Oct 22.


DOI:10.1007/s00586-016-4779-7
PMID:27771787
Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical arthroplasty for patients with cervical spondylosis. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were used to search for relevant articles published prior to April 2016 to identify studies comparing ACDF and cervical arthroplasty involving patients with cervical spondylosis. Relative risks (RR) and mean differences (MD) were used to measure the efficacy and safety of ACDF and cervical arthroplasty using the random effects model. RESULTS: The meta-analysis of 17 studies involved 3122 patients diagnosed with cervical spondylosis. Patients undergoing ACDF showed lower overall success rate (RR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.77-0.92; P < 0.001), higher VAS score (MD 0.36; 95 % CI 0.08-0.64; P = 0.011), and shorter mean surgical duration (MD -1.62; 95 % CI -2.80 to -0.44; P = 0.007) when compared with cervical arthroplasty. However, the association between ACDF therapy and the risk of mean blood loss (MD -0.16; 95 % CI -0.34 to 0.02; P = 0.082), mean hospitalization (MD 0.02; 95 % CI -0.31 to 0.36; P = 0.901), patient satisfaction (RR 0.96; 95 % CI 0.92-1.00; P = 0.066), neck disability index (MD 0.20; 95 % CI -0.05 to 0.44; P = 0.113), reoperation (RR 1.25; 95 % CI 0.64-2.41; P = 0.514), or complication (RR 1.17; 95 % CI 0.90-1.52; P = 0.242) was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing ACDF therapy tended to exhibit lower overall success rate, higher VAS score, and decreased mean surgical duration when compared with patients treated with cervical arthroplasty.

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与颈椎人工关节置换术治疗颈椎病患者的疗效和安全性。 方法:使用PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆检索2016年4月之前发表的相关文章,以确定比较ACDF与颈椎人工关节置换术治疗颈椎病患者的研究。采用随机效应模型,用相对危险度(RR)和平均差(MD)来衡量ACDF和颈椎人工关节置换术的疗效和安全性。 结果:对17项研究的荟萃分析涉及3122例诊断为颈椎病的患者。与颈椎人工关节置换术相比,接受ACDF治疗的患者总体成功率较低(RR 0.84;95% CI 0.77 - 0.92;P < 0.001),视觉模拟评分(VAS)较高(MD 0.36;95% CI 0.08 - 0.64;P = 0.011),平均手术时间较短(MD -1.62;95% CI -2.80至 -0.44;P = 0.007)。然而,ACDF治疗与平均失血量(MD -0.16;95% CI -0.3至0.02;P = 0.082)、平均住院时间(MD 0.02;95% CI -0.31至0.36;P = 0.901)、患者满意度(RR 0.96;95% CI 0.92 - 1.00;P = 0.066)、颈部功能障碍指数(MD 0.20;95% CI -0.05至0.44;P = 0.113)、再次手术(RR 1.25;95% CI 0.64 - 2.41;P = 0.514)或并发症(RR 1.17;95% CI 0.90 - 1.52;P = 0.242)之间的关联无统计学意义。 结论:与接受颈椎人工关节置换术治疗的患者相比,接受ACDF治疗的患者总体成功率较低,VAS评分较高,平均手术时间缩短。

相似文献

[1]
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical arthroplasty for the management of cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis.

Eur Spine J. 2017-4

[2]
Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for single-level cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 2012-8-17

[3]
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Eur Spine J. 2017-4

[4]
Long-term Outcomes of the US FDA IDE Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing PCM Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015-5-15

[5]
A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013-7-1

[6]
Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2016-8

[7]
Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for the Treatment of 2-Level Cervical Spondylopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Clin Spine Surg. 2016-11

[8]
Comparison of the short- and long-term treatment effect of cervical disk replacement and anterior cervical disk fusion: a meta-analysis.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015-7

[9]
The change of adjacent segment after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Spine J. 2017-10

[10]
Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylosis.

J Clin Neurosci. 2015-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward cervical spondylosis among the healthy general population.

BMC Public Health. 2025-3-14

[2]
Comparison of anterior and posterior approach in the treatment of acute and chronic cervical spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis.

Front Surg. 2024-8-23

[3]
Zero-profile implant system versus novel plate systems after ACDF for comparison of sagittal balance parameters and clinical efficacy analysis.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024-6-19

[4]
Correlation of imaging characteristics of degenerative cervical myelopathy and the surgical approach with improvement for postoperative neck pain and neural function: a retrospective cohort study.

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024-6-1

[5]
Restore cervical sagittal alignment by cervical disc arthroplasty and systematic total bilateral uncuscectomy in severe spondylosis: A prospective study.

Brain Spine. 2023-6-12

[6]
Cervical disc arthroplasty with systematic total bilateral uncuscectomy - Adapted technique particularly in severe spondylosis: A prospective study.

Brain Spine. 2023-4-1

[7]
Biomechanical evaluation of a novel biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc in canine cervical cadaveric spines.

JOR Spine. 2023-2-21

[8]
The Efficacy of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion and Posterior Total Laminectomy on Cervical Spinal Cord Injury and Quality of Life.

Comput Math Methods Med. 2022

[9]
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without plate (ACDFWP) versus anterior cervical disc arthroplasty (ACDA) for cervical spondylosis: A meta-analysis and literature review.

Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2022-8

[10]
Implant complications after one-level or two-level cervical disc arthroplasty: A retrospective single-centre study of 105 patients.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020-9-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
Comparison of artificial cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for one-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015-7

[2]
Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2013-9-6

[3]
A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013-7-1

[4]
A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013-3-20

[5]
A meta-analysis of comparative outcomes following cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical fusion: results from 4 prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials and up to 1226 patients.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012-5-15

[6]
Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011-9-21

[7]
Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011-6-24

[8]
Randomized, controlled, multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012-3-15

[9]
Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year's results.

Eur Spine J. 2011-1-8

[10]
Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2010-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索