• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Outcomes of Physician-Staffed Versus Non-Physician-Staffed Helicopter Transport for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.由医生配备人员与非医生配备人员的直升机转运用于ST段抬高型心肌梗死的结局
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 2;6(2):e004936. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004936.
2
Helicopter vs. ground transportation of patients bound for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.直升机与地面交通工具运送拟行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的比较
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Apr;62(4):568-578. doi: 10.1111/aas.13092. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
3
Emergency management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Eastern Austria: a descriptive quality control study.奥地利东部 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的应急管理:描述性质量控制研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 May 9;26(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0504-3.
4
Comparison of physician-staffed helicopter with ground-based emergency medical services for trauma patients.创伤患者的医护人员直升机与地面紧急医疗服务比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;45:75-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.02.062. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
5
Does helicopter transport delay prehospital transfer for STEMI patients in rural areas? Findings from the CRAC France PCI registry.直升机转运是否会延迟农村地区 STEMI 患者的院前转运?来自法国 CRAC PCI 登记处的研究结果。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Dec;9(8):958-965. doi: 10.1177/2048872619848976. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
6
Paramedic versus physician-staffed ambulances and prehospital delays in the management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.急救员与医师随车的救护车和 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的院前延误。
Cardiol J. 2021;28(1):110-117. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0072. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
7
Physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service has a beneficial impact on the incidence of prehospital hypoxia and secured airways on patients with severe traumatic brain injury.配备医生的直升机紧急医疗服务对严重创伤性脑损伤患者的院前低氧血症和确保气道的发生率有有益影响。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 15;25(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0438-1.
8
Association between physician-staffed helicopter versus ground emergency medical services and mortality for pediatric trauma patients: A retrospective nationwide cohort study.医生配备直升机与地面紧急医疗服务对儿科创伤患者死亡率的影响:一项回顾性全国队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0237192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237192. eCollection 2020.
9
Helicopter emergency medical service for patients with acute coronary syndrome: selection validity and impact on clinical outcomes.直升机紧急医疗服务用于急性冠状动脉综合征患者:选择有效性及其对临床结局的影响。
Heart Vessels. 2022 Jul;37(7):1125-1135. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02022-1. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
10
Renal Protection Using Remote Ischemic Peri-Conditioning During Inter-Facility Helicopter Transport of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Study.在ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院间直升机转运期间使用远程缺血预处理进行肾脏保护:一项回顾性研究
J Interv Cardiol. 2016 Dec;29(6):603-611. doi: 10.1111/joic.12351. Epub 2016 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
A physician-staffed ground emergency medical service does not significantly shorten door-to-balloon time in patients with STEMI: an observational study in a single emergency center in Japan.一项针对日本某单一急救中心的观察性研究表明,配备医师的地面紧急医疗服务并不能显著缩短ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的门球时间。
Acute Med Surg. 2020 Jul 15;7(1):e542. doi: 10.1002/ams2.542. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation of a physician-staffed helicopter: impact on time to primary PCI.实施医生配备的直升机:对首次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时间的影响。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Aug 22;9(4):477-83. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I4A77.
2
Impact of a physician-staffed helicopter on a regional trauma system: a prospective, controlled, observational study.医生配备直升机对区域创伤系统的影响:一项前瞻性、对照、观察性研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 May;57(5):660-8. doi: 10.1111/aas.12052. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
3
2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2013 Jan 29;127(4):e362-425. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742cf6. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
4
Physician staffed helicopter emergency medical service dispatch via centralised control or directly by crew - case identification rates and effect on the Sydney paediatric trauma system.由中央控制或机组人员直接调配配备医生的直升机紧急医疗服务——病例识别率及其对悉尼儿科创伤系统的影响。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Dec 18;20:82. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-82.
5
Pre PCI hospital antithrombotic therapy for ST elevation myocardial infarction: striving for consensus.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术前 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的抗栓治疗:追求共识。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2012 Jul;34(1):20-30. doi: 10.1007/s11239-012-0744-4.
6
Use of emergency medical service transport among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者使用紧急医疗服务转运:来自国家心血管数据登记急性冠状动脉治疗干预结局网络登记-遵循指南的研究结果。
Circulation. 2011 Jul 12;124(2):154-63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.002345. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
7
Safe transport of patients with acute coronary syndrome or cardiogenic shock by skilled air medical crews.熟练的航空医疗人员安全转运急性冠状动脉综合征或心源性休克患者。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):240-5. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.541978. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
8
Predictors of reperfusion delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention from the HORIZONS-AMI trial.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者再灌注延迟的预测因素:HORIZONS-AMI 试验结果
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Dec 1;106(11):1527-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.07.033. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
9
The NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG: transforming contemporary acute myocardial infarction clinical care.NCDR ACTION 注册-GWTG:改变当代急性心肌梗死的临床护理。
Heart. 2010 Nov;96(22):1798-802. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.200261. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
10
Air ambulance transport times and advanced cardiac life support interventions during the interfacility transfer of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.空中救护车转运时间与急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者院间转运中实施的高级心脏生命支持干预。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jul-Sep;14(3):292-9. doi: 10.3109/10903121003760192.

由医生配备人员与非医生配备人员的直升机转运用于ST段抬高型心肌梗死的结局

Outcomes of Physician-Staffed Versus Non-Physician-Staffed Helicopter Transport for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

作者信息

Gunnarsson Sverrir I, Mitchell Joseph, Busch Mary S, Larson Brenda, Gharacholou S Michael, Li Zhanhai, Raval Amish N

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

Mayo Clinic Health System-Franciscan Healthcare, La Crosse, WI.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Feb 2;6(2):e004936. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004936.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.116.004936
PMID:28154162
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5523778/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) on ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patient transfer is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of physician-staffed HEMS (Physician-HEMS) versus non-physician-staffed (Standard-HEMS) in patients with STEMI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 398 STEMI patients transferred by either Physician-HEMS (n=327) or Standard-HEMS (n=71) for primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention at 2 hospitals between 2006 and 2014. Data were collected from electronic medical records and each institution's contribution to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Median electrocardiogram-to-balloon time was longer for the Standard-HEMS group than for the Physician-HEMS group (118 vs 107 minutes; P=0.002). The Standard-HEMS group was more likely than the Physician-HEMS group to receive nitroglycerin (37% vs 15%; P<0.001) and opioid analgesics (42.3% vs 21.7%; P<0.001) during transport. In-hospital adverse outcomes, including cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, and serious arrhythmias, were more common in the Standard-HEMS group (25.4% vs 11.3%; P=0.002). After adjusting for age, sex, Killip class, and transport time, patients transferred by Standard-HEMS had increased risk of any serious in-hospital adverse event (odds ratio=2.91; 95% CI=1.39-6.06; P=0.004). In-hospital mortality was not statistically different between the 2 groups (9.9% in the Standard-HEMS group vs 4.9% in the Physician-HEMS group; P=0.104).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with STEMI transported by Standard-HEMS had longer transport times, higher rates of nitroglycerin and opioid administration, and higher rates of adjusted in-hospital events. Efforts to better understand optimal transport strategies in STEMI patients are needed.

摘要

背景

由医生配备的直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者转运的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估配备医生的HEMS(医生-HEMS)与未配备医生的HEMS(标准-HEMS)在STEMI患者中的特征和结局。

方法与结果

我们研究了2006年至2014年间在两家医院通过医生-HEMS(n = 327)或标准-HEMS(n = 71)转运以进行初次或抢救性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的398例STEMI患者。数据从电子病历和各机构对国家心血管数据注册中心的贡献中收集。两组之间的基线特征相似。标准-HEMS组的心电图至球囊时间中位数比医生-HEMS组长(118对107分钟;P = 0.002)。标准-HEMS组在转运过程中比医生-HEMS组更有可能接受硝酸甘油(37%对15%;P < 0.001)和阿片类镇痛药(42.3%对21.7%;P < 0.001)。包括心脏骤停、心源性休克和严重心律失常在内的院内不良结局在标准-HEMS组中更常见(25.4%对11.3%;P = 0.002)。在调整年龄、性别、Killip分级和转运时间后,由标准-HEMS转运的患者发生任何严重院内不良事件的风险增加(比值比 = 2.91;95%可信区间 = 1.39 - 6.06;P = 0.004)。两组之间的院内死亡率无统计学差异(标准-HEMS组为9.9%,医生-HEMS组为4.9%;P = 0.104)。

结论

由标准-HEMS转运的STEMI患者转运时间更长,硝酸甘油和阿片类药物使用率更高,调整后的院内事件发生率更高。需要努力更好地了解STEMI患者的最佳转运策略。