• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生指导:腹股沟疝观察等待管理中患者的选择。

A clinician's guide to patient selection for watchful waiting management of inguinal hernia.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2011 Mar;253(3):605-10. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820b04e9.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820b04e9
PMID:21239979
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to assist surgeons in managing patients with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia by identifying characteristics that predict crossover to surgery or worsening of hernia symptoms.

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have suggested that watchful waiting management of minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia is an acceptable alternative to surgical repair. However, these trials found that roughly a quarter of patients would elect for repair in the first 2 years, suggesting that not all patients are good candidates for watchful waiting.

METHODS

The 336 patients randomized to watchful waiting in the American College of Surgeons Watchful Waiting Hernia Trial constituted the study population. Preoperative patient characteristics were used to predict 2 outcomes, either crossover to surgery or the development of hernia pain limiting activities and/or crossover to surgery. Patients in our study were part of a previously registered randomized trial: NCT00263250.

RESULTS

At 2 years, 72 patients crossed over to surgery, with pain with strenuous activities [odds ratio (OR), 1.3 per 10-mm visual analog scale pain scale], chronic constipation (OR, 4.9), prostatism (OR, 2.9), being married (OR, 2.3), and good health [OR, 3.0 American Society of Anesthesiologists Class (ASA) 1 vs 2], predicting crossover. An additional 28 patients developed pain, limiting their activities, with pain during strenuous activities (OR, 1.3 per 10-mm visual analog scale) and chronic constipation (OR, 4.5), predicting the combined outcome of pain limiting activities and/or crossover to surgery. Higher levels of activity reduced the risk (OR, 0.95) of this combined outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Readily identifiable patient characteristics can predict those patients with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia who are likely to "fail" watchful waiting hernia management. Consideration of these factors will allow surgeons to optimally tailor hernia management.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在帮助外科医生管理症状轻微的腹股沟疝患者,通过识别预测交叉至手术或疝症状恶化的特征。

背景

随机试验表明,对症状轻微的腹股沟疝进行密切观察等待管理是手术修复的一种可接受的替代方案。然而,这些试验发现,大约四分之一的患者会在头两年内选择手术修复,这表明并非所有患者都适合密切观察等待。

方法

在接受美国外科医师学会密切观察等待疝试验的 336 名随机分组接受密切观察等待的患者中,构成了研究人群。使用术前患者特征来预测 2 个结果,要么交叉至手术,要么出现疝痛限制活动和/或交叉至手术。我们研究中的患者是先前注册的随机试验的一部分:NCT00263250。

结果

在 2 年时,有 72 例患者交叉至手术,其中剧烈活动时疼痛(比值比 [OR],每 10mm 视觉模拟量表疼痛评分增加 1.3)、慢性便秘(OR,4.9)、前列腺问题(OR,2.9)、已婚(OR,2.3)和健康状况良好(OR,美国麻醉医师学会 [ASA] 1 级比 2 级增加 3.0),这些都预测了交叉。另有 28 例患者出现疼痛,限制了他们的活动,其中剧烈活动时疼痛(OR,每 10mm 视觉模拟量表疼痛评分增加 1.3)和慢性便秘(OR,4.5)预测了疼痛限制活动和/或交叉至手术的联合结果。更高水平的活动降低了这一联合结果的风险(OR,0.95)。

结论

易于识别的患者特征可以预测那些有症状轻微腹股沟疝的患者可能会“失败”密切观察等待疝管理。考虑这些因素将使外科医生能够优化疝管理。

相似文献

1
A clinician's guide to patient selection for watchful waiting management of inguinal hernia.临床医生指导:腹股沟疝观察等待管理中患者的选择。
Ann Surg. 2011 Mar;253(3):605-10. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820b04e9.
2
Watchful waiting vs repair of inguinal hernia in minimally symptomatic men: a randomized clinical trial.轻度症状男性腹股沟疝的观察等待与修补:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2006 Jan 18;295(3):285-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.3.285.
3
Watchful Waiting Versus Surgery of Mildly Symptomatic or Asymptomatic Inguinal Hernia in Men Aged 50 Years and Older: A Randomized Controlled Trial.50岁及以上男性轻度症状性或无症状腹股沟疝的观察等待与手术治疗:一项随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2018 Jan;267(1):42-49. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002243.
4
Effectiveness of endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia correction for clinically occult inguinal hernia (EFFECT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.内镜全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术治疗临床隐匿性腹股沟疝的有效性(EFFECT):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jun 18;19(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2711-7.
5
Watchful waiting vs repair for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia in men: a systematic review.观察等待与修复治疗男性腹股沟疝无症状或轻微症状:系统评价。
Hernia. 2021 Oct;25(5):1121-1128. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02295-3. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial of a nonoperative strategy (watchful waiting) for men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias.有症状腹股沟疝非手术治疗(观察等待)的随机对照试验的长期结果。
Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):508-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a19725.
7
The development of a clinical trial to determine if watchful waiting is an acceptable alternative to routine herniorrhaphy for patients with minimal or no hernia symptoms.开展一项临床试验,以确定对于疝症状轻微或无症状的患者,观察等待是否可作为常规疝修补术的可接受替代方案。
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 May;196(5):737-42. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00003-6.
8
Inguinal hernia: follow or repair?腹股沟疝:随访还是修复?
Adv Surg. 2014;48:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2014.05.017.
9
[Is the presence of an asymptomatic inguinal hernia enough to justify repair?].[无症状腹股沟疝的存在足以证明进行修补是合理的吗?]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2015 Nov 11;104(23):1259-63. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a002177.
10
Does delaying repair of an asymptomatic hernia have a penalty?延迟修复无症状疝气会有不良后果吗?
Am J Surg. 2008 Jan;195(1):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.021.

引用本文的文献

1
Groin hernia.腹股沟疝
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025 Jul 3;11(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41572-025-00631-4.
2
QUALITY OF LIFE USING EURAHS-QoL SCORES AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT OF INGUINAL HERNIA: LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL (TAPP) AND LICHTENSTEIN TECHNIQUES.使用 EURAHS-QoL 评分评估腹股沟疝手术后的生活质量:腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)和 Lichtenstein 技术。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2024 Jun 17;37:e1798. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020240005e1798. eCollection 2024.
3
Asymptomatic patent processus vaginalis is a risk for developing external inguinal hernia in adults: A prospective cohort study.
无症状性鞘状突未闭是成人发生腹股沟外疝的一个危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Mar 27;64:102258. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102258. eCollection 2021 Apr.
4
Inguinal hernia repair with or without mesh in late adolescent males.青春期晚期男性腹股沟疝修补术(使用或不使用补片)
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Apr;100(4):246-251. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.4.246. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
5
Trends in the use of patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair: a quantitative systematic review.患者报告结局测量在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用趋势:一项定量系统评价。
Hernia. 2021 Oct;25(5):1111-1120. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02322-3. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
6
Watchful waiting vs repair for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia in men: a systematic review.观察等待与修复治疗男性腹股沟疝无症状或轻微症状:系统评价。
Hernia. 2021 Oct;25(5):1121-1128. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02295-3. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
8
Emergency department utilization and predictors of mortality for inpatient inguinal hernia repairs.住院腹股沟疝修补术的急诊科利用率及死亡率预测因素
J Surg Res. 2017 May 15;212:270-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.12.012. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
9
A Prospective Assessment of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Initial Non-Operative Management of Ventral Hernias.腹疝初始非手术治疗的临床及患者报告结局的前瞻性评估
World J Surg. 2017 May;41(5):1267-1273. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3859-5.
10
Coughing-induced bowel transection in a patient with an incarcerated inguinal hernia: a case report.嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者咳嗽诱发肠横断:一例报告
J Med Case Rep. 2013 Feb 15;7:47. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-7-47.