School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Aug 15;36(18):1505-11. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f49eec.
Observational cross-sectional study.
To perform a psychometric evaluation of Simplified Chinese versions of back pain beliefs questionnaires for use in health care professionals living in mainland China.
Back pain beliefs are of importance in the development of chronic low back pain (LBP) and disability. Different types of beliefs exist with regard to LBP and these include inevitable consequences of LBP and fear-avoidance beliefs. LBP beliefs held by health care providers are also known to influence their patients' pain beliefs and can contribute to the development of chronic LBP and disability. At present, validated questionnaires such as the Back Beliefs Questionnaire, Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale, and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire are commonly used to investigate back pain beliefs held by health care professionals working in western countries. There are no published nor validated Simplified Chinese versions to allow investigation of back pain beliefs in health care professionals living in mainland China.
The English versions of the earlier mentioned questionnaires were translated and culturally adapted into Simplified Chinese using the double-back-translation method. A psychometric evaluation of the translated questionnaires was conducted on 65 health care professionals (rehabilitation medicine specialists, osteopaths, and nurses), with and without LBP, practicing in Shanghai, China. The questionnaires were completed twice within 7- to 10-day period.
The Back Beliefs Questionnaire, Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale, and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (work and physical subscales) had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach α range: 0.70-0.87) and construct validity (r = 0.40-0.49, P < 0.05), good reproducibility (Intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC(2,1) range: 0.85-0.93) and an absence of any floor or ceiling effects.
This study showed that the Simplified Chinese versions of back pain beliefs questionnaires are valid and reliable. Therefore, these questionnaires can be used in research involving Chinese health care professionals living in mainland China.
观察性横断面研究。
对中文版腰痛信念问卷进行心理测量评估,以用于居住在中国内地的医疗保健专业人员。
腰痛信念在慢性下腰痛(LBP)和残疾的发展中很重要。关于 LBP 存在不同类型的信念,包括 LBP 的必然后果和恐惧回避信念。医疗保健提供者持有的 LBP 信念也被认为会影响他们患者的疼痛信念,并可能导致慢性 LBP 和残疾的发展。目前,常用的验证问卷,如腰痛信念问卷、医疗保健提供者疼痛和损伤关系量表以及恐惧回避信念问卷,用于调查在西方国家工作的医疗保健专业人员持有的腰痛信念。目前尚无已发表或验证的简体中文版,无法对居住在中国内地的医疗保健专业人员的腰痛信念进行调查。
使用双回译法将上述早期提到的问卷的英文版本翻译成简体中文并进行文化适应。对 65 名在中国上海工作的有或没有腰痛的医疗保健专业人员(康复医学专家、整骨医生和护士)进行了翻译问卷的心理测量评估。这些问卷在 7-10 天内完成两次。
腰痛信念问卷、医疗保健提供者疼痛和损伤关系量表以及恐惧回避信念问卷(工作和身体分量表)具有可接受的内部一致性(Cronbach α 范围:0.70-0.87)和结构有效性(r = 0.40-0.49,P <0.05),良好的再现性(组内相关系数,ICC(2,1)范围:0.85-0.93),且无地板或天花板效应。
本研究表明,腰痛信念问卷的简体中文版具有有效性和可靠性。因此,这些问卷可用于涉及居住在中国内地的中国医疗保健专业人员的研究。