Suppr超能文献

肝动脉治疗后行肝切除术:使用钇-90 或载药微球化疗后,安全吗?

Hepatectomy after hepatic arterial therapy with either yttrium-90 or drug-eluting bead chemotherapy: is it safe?

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2011 Feb;13(2):91-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00246.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of hepatic arterial therapy (HAT) with either yttrium-90 or drug-eluting bead therapy for initially unresectable hepatic malignancies has risen significantly. The safety of hepatic resection after hepatic arterial therapy (HAT) is not established.

OBJECTIVE

The present study evaluates the safety profile for hepatic resection after HAT.

METHODS

We identified 840 patients undergoing hepatectomy for primary or metastatic lesions. Forty patients underwent HAT before hepatectomy (pre-HAT). A 1:4 case-matched analysis compared three groups: (i) pre-HAT and pre-operative chemotherapy (n=40); (ii) pre-operative chemotherapy (n=160); and (iii) no pre-operative therapy (n=640). Controls were matched for age, resection type, maximal tumour size and magnitude of resection. Morbidity and mortality among groups were compared using a graded complication scale.

RESULTS

There were no differences in post-operative complications, grade of complication or liver-specific complications among the groups. A proportional hazards model for all patients did not demonstrate any association between increased complications and either pre-HAT or pre-operative chemotherapy when compared with patients without pre-operative therapy (P=0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-HAT demonstrated similar morbidity, liver-specific morbidity and intra-operative complications when compared with patients undergoing pre-operative chemotherapy alone or without pre-operative chemotherapy. These results suggest that pre-HAT is safe and should not preclude hepatectomy in carefully selected patients.

摘要

背景

对于最初无法切除的肝脏恶性肿瘤,使用肝动脉治疗(HAT)联合钇 90 或载药微球治疗的方法已经显著增加。肝动脉治疗(HAT)后行肝切除术的安全性尚未确定。

目的

本研究评估 HAT 后行肝切除术的安全性概况。

方法

我们确定了 840 例因原发性或转移性病变而行肝切除术的患者。40 例患者在肝切除前行 HAT(术前 HAT)。采用 1:4 病例匹配分析比较了三组患者:(i)术前 HAT 联合术前化疗(n=40);(ii)术前化疗(n=160);以及(iii)无术前治疗(n=640)。对照组在年龄、切除类型、最大肿瘤大小和切除程度方面进行匹配。使用分级并发症量表比较各组的发病率和死亡率。

结果

各组间术后并发症、并发症严重程度或肝脏特异性并发症无差异。对于所有患者的比例风险模型显示,与未行术前治疗的患者相比,术前 HAT 或术前化疗与并发症增加之间没有关联(P=0.7)。

结论

与单独行术前化疗或不行术前化疗的患者相比,术前 HAT 的发病率、肝脏特异性发病率和术中并发症相似。这些结果表明,术前 HAT 是安全的,不应排除在精心选择的患者中行肝切除术。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Surgical treatment for liver cancer.肝癌的外科治疗。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb 28;16(8):927-33. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i8.927.
5
Cancer statistics, 2009.2009年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Jul-Aug;59(4):225-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. Epub 2009 May 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验