• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据常规技术和对个体过敏原免疫球蛋白 E 的监测进行的毒液免疫治疗(VIT)的随访。

Follow-up of venom immunotherapy (VIT) based on conventional techniques and monitoring of immunoglobulin E to individual venom allergens.

机构信息

Allergy Unit, Hospital Xeral Calde, Lugo, Spain.

出版信息

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2010;20(6):506-13.

PMID:21243935
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of venom immunotherapy (VIT) and monitor changes in in vivo and in vitro test results after 5 years of treatment and subsequent follow-up. To study the profile of immunoglobulin (Ig) E to individual allergens prior to treatment and 1 year afterwards.

METHODS

We studied 562 patients with hymenoptera venom allergy (438 to bee, 124 to wasp), all of whom underwent immunotherapy with Apis or Vespula extract. The patients were followed up using conventional in vivo and in vitro tests, and in 51 cases, specific IgE against the main hymenoptera allergens was measured before starting and after 1 year of treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 387 patients who completed VLT, 130 sensitized to Apis and 68 to Vespula suffered spontaneous re-stings during treatment. Of these, 123 (94.6%) did not suffer any reaction and 64 (94.1%) suffered only a local reaction. Sixty-two patients sensitized to Apis and 14 sensitized to Vespula suffered spontaneous re-stings after stopping treatment. Only 3 patients suffered a systemic reaction (grade I Müller). At the end of treatment, the results of skin tests and specific IgE to whole extract improved significantly. Reductions in IgE to the main allergens were observed after 1 year of treatment (median differences in Ves v 5, -238.0, P = .0425; and in Api m 1, -183.0, P = .0024).

CONCLUSION

The high rate of spontaneous re-stings shows that efficacy is maintained for years after completing treatment in a real-world setting. Determination of IgE to individual venom allergens may offer new perspectives in the diagnosis and follow-up of these patients.

摘要

目的

评估毒液免疫疗法(VIT)的疗效,并在治疗后 5 年及后续随访期间监测体内和体外检测结果的变化。研究治疗前和治疗 1 年后患者对单个过敏原的免疫球蛋白(Ig)E 谱。

方法

我们研究了 562 例膜翅目毒液过敏患者(438 例对蜜蜂,124 例对黄蜂),所有患者均接受了 Apis 或 Vespula 提取物免疫治疗。通过常规体内和体外检测对患者进行随访,并在 51 例患者中,在开始治疗前和治疗 1 年后测量了针对主要膜翅目过敏原的特异性 IgE。

结果

在完成 VLT 的 387 例患者中,有 130 例对 Apis 敏感,68 例对 Vespula 敏感,在治疗期间发生了自发性再蜇伤。其中 123 例(94.6%)未发生任何反应,64 例(94.1%)仅发生局部反应。62 例对 Apis 敏感,14 例对 Vespula 敏感的患者在停止治疗后发生自发性再蜇伤。仅 3 例患者发生全身性反应(Müller 分级 I)。治疗结束时,皮肤试验和全提取物特异性 IgE 的结果明显改善。治疗 1 年后,观察到 IgE 对主要过敏原的降低(Ves v 5 的中位数差异为-238.0,P =.0425;Api m 1 的中位数差异为-183.0,P =.0024)。

结论

在现实环境中完成治疗多年后,自发性再蜇伤的高发生率表明疗效得以维持。确定单个毒液过敏原的 IgE 可能为这些患者的诊断和随访提供新的视角。

相似文献

1
Follow-up of venom immunotherapy (VIT) based on conventional techniques and monitoring of immunoglobulin E to individual venom allergens.根据常规技术和对个体过敏原免疫球蛋白 E 的监测进行的毒液免疫治疗(VIT)的随访。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2010;20(6):506-13.
2
Rush hymenoptera venom immunotherapy is efficacious and safe.速发型膜翅目毒液免疫疗法有效且安全。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2006;16(4):232-8.
3
Immunoblot studies in allergic patients to hymenoptera venom before and during immunotherapy.对膜翅目昆虫毒液过敏患者在免疫治疗前及治疗期间的免疫印迹研究。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Sep;37(7):273-8.
4
Natural history of Hymenoptera venom allergy in Eastern Spain.西班牙东部膜翅目毒液过敏的自然病史。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Feb;35(2):179-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02169.x.
5
Development of new IgE specificities to hymenoptera allergens during venom-specific immunotherapy.在毒液特异性免疫治疗期间针对膜翅目过敏原产生新的IgE特异性。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 May;37(5):171-6.
6
Hymenoptera venom allergy: analysis of double positivity to honey bee and Vespula venom by estimation of IgE antibodies to species-specific major allergens Api m1 and Ves v5.膜翅目毒液过敏:通过检测针对物种特异性主要过敏原Api m1和Ves v5的IgE抗体,分析对蜜蜂和黄蜂毒液的双重阳性反应。
Allergy. 2009 Apr;64(4):543-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01794.x. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
7
Safety profile of hymenoptera venom immunotherapy (VIT) in monosensitized patients: lack of new sensitization to nontreated insect venom.变应原免疫治疗(VIT)在单重致敏患者中的安全性特征:对未治疗的昆虫毒液无新的致敏性。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(1):22-7.
8
Alternating Polistes-Vespula venom immunotherapy: a therapeutic strategy to resolve a diagnostic deficiency.交替注射胡蜂-马蜂毒液免疫疗法:一种解决诊断不足的治疗策略。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(1):28-33.
9
Humoral immunological response in patients with venom allergy during specific immunotherapy.毒液过敏患者在特异性免疫治疗期间的体液免疫反应。
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst. 1995;40(2):376-82.
10
Long-term protection after stopping venom immunotherapy: results of re-stings in 200 patients.停止毒液免疫治疗后的长期保护作用:200例患者再次被蜇伤的结果
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 May;101(5):606-12. doi: 10.1016/S0091-6749(98)70167-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Safety and Efficacy Clinical Data of an Improved Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy Product for the Treatment of Bee Venom Allergy.一种用于治疗蜂毒过敏的改良型变应原特异性免疫治疗产品的真实世界安全性和有效性临床数据。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 May 13;11(5):979. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11050979.
2
Survey on practice of venom immunotherapy in France.法国毒液免疫疗法实践调查。
Arch Med Sci. 2016 Feb 1;12(1):150-5. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.57591. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
3
Venom immunotherapy: an updated review.毒液免疫疗法:更新综述。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014 Jul;14(7):449. doi: 10.1007/s11882-014-0449-1.
4
Venom immunotherapy for preventing allergic reactions to insect stings.用于预防昆虫叮咬过敏反应的毒液免疫疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD008838. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008838.pub2.