• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交替注射胡蜂-马蜂毒液免疫疗法:一种解决诊断不足的治疗策略。

Alternating Polistes-Vespula venom immunotherapy: a therapeutic strategy to resolve a diagnostic deficiency.

机构信息

Sección de Alergia, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain.

出版信息

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(1):28-33.

PMID:21370720
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Mediterranean regions, double sensitization to Polistes and Vespula species is frequent in patients reacting to an unidentified wasp sting. Since both genera are present, it is often difficult to determine which insect is responsible and, consequently, select venom for immunotherapy. When a specific diagnosis cannot be made, a new therapeutic strategy should be undertaken.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study in which 37 patients who were allergic to venom from Vespula and Polistes species received a 3-year schedule of alternating immunotherapy. Twenty monosensitized patients (10 to Vespula and 10 to Polistes) received conventional venom immunotherapy (VIT) during the same period. All 57 patients received the same number of injections. The effectiveness of VIT was assessed by means of re-sting, which was performed yearly. Serum specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E and IgG4 were also studied,

RESULTS

All the cases tolerated all the stings. One control patient developed a mild systemic reaction after the first-year Vespula sting but tolerated subsequent re-stings. Both cases and controls reached significant changes in levels of IgE and IgG4 after VIT (P < .04 at minimum). The cases developed a response as expected, although this was less intense than in the control group. In the Polistes control subgroup, sIgE to Polistes decreased to under baseline levels, after a marked initial increase; this decrease was not observed in the Vespula subgroup.

CONCLUSION

An alternating VIT strategy is appropriate and provides protection to patients sensitized to Vespula and Polistes.

摘要

背景

在地中海地区,对不明胡蜂蜇伤产生过敏反应的患者常对胡蜂属和马蜂属的物种呈双重过敏。由于这两个属都存在,通常很难确定是哪种昆虫引起过敏,因此也难以选择用于免疫治疗的毒液。当无法做出明确诊断时,应采取新的治疗策略。

方法

我们进行了一项病例对照研究,纳入了 37 例对胡蜂属和马蜂属毒液过敏的患者,他们接受了为期 3 年的交替免疫治疗方案。同期,20 例单重过敏患者(10 例对胡蜂过敏,10 例对马蜂过敏)接受了常规蜂毒免疫疗法(VIT)。所有 57 例患者接受了相同数量的注射。通过每年进行的再蜇刺评估 VIT 的有效性。还研究了血清特异性免疫球蛋白(Ig)E 和 IgG4。

结果

所有病例均耐受了所有蜇刺。1 例对照患者在第 1 年胡蜂蜇刺后出现轻度全身性反应,但耐受了随后的再蜇刺。在 VIT 后,病例和对照组的 IgE 和 IgG4 水平均发生了显著变化(至少 P <.04)。尽管与对照组相比,这种反应较弱,但病例确实产生了预期的反应。在马蜂对照组亚组中,Polistes 特异性 IgE 降低至基线水平以下,而在胡蜂对照组亚组中则未观察到这种降低。

结论

交替 VIT 策略是合适的,可为对胡蜂和马蜂敏感的患者提供保护。

相似文献

1
Alternating Polistes-Vespula venom immunotherapy: a therapeutic strategy to resolve a diagnostic deficiency.交替注射胡蜂-马蜂毒液免疫疗法:一种解决诊断不足的治疗策略。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(1):28-33.
2
Safety profile of hymenoptera venom immunotherapy (VIT) in monosensitized patients: lack of new sensitization to nontreated insect venom.变应原免疫治疗(VIT)在单重致敏患者中的安全性特征:对未治疗的昆虫毒液无新的致敏性。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(1):22-7.
3
Immunoblot studies in allergic patients to hymenoptera venom before and during immunotherapy.对膜翅目昆虫毒液过敏患者在免疫治疗前及治疗期间的免疫印迹研究。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Sep;37(7):273-8.
4
Rush hymenoptera venom immunotherapy is efficacious and safe.速发型膜翅目毒液免疫疗法有效且安全。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2006;16(4):232-8.
5
Development of new IgE specificities to hymenoptera allergens during venom-specific immunotherapy.在毒液特异性免疫治疗期间针对膜翅目过敏原产生新的IgE特异性。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 May;37(5):171-6.
6
Follow-up of venom immunotherapy (VIT) based on conventional techniques and monitoring of immunoglobulin E to individual venom allergens.根据常规技术和对个体过敏原免疫球蛋白 E 的监测进行的毒液免疫治疗(VIT)的随访。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2010;20(6):506-13.
7
Which immunotherapy product is better for patients allergic to Polistes venom? A laboratory and clinical study.对于对胡蜂毒液过敏的患者,哪种免疫疗法产品更好?一项实验室与临床研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 7;12(7):e0180270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180270. eCollection 2017.
8
Component-resolved diagnosis of vespid venom-allergic individuals: phospholipases and antigen 5s are necessary to identify Vespula or Polistes sensitization.蜂类毒液过敏个体的成分分辨诊断:磷脂酶和抗原 5s 对于鉴定胡蜂或马蜂致敏原是必要的。
Allergy. 2012 Apr;67(4):528-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02781.x. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
9
[The wasp/mosquito syndrome].[黄蜂/蚊子综合征]
Allerg Immunol (Paris). 1999 Jun;31(6):175-84.
10
Patients still reacting to a sting challenge while receiving conventional Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy are protected by increased venom doses.在接受常规膜翅目毒液免疫治疗时仍对叮咬激发试验有反应的患者,通过增加毒液剂量得到保护。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Dec;108(6):1027-32. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.119154.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural and Induced Tolerance to Hymenoptera Venom: A Single Mechanism?自然和诱导对膜翅目毒液的耐受性:单一机制?
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Jun 22;14(7):426. doi: 10.3390/toxins14070426.
2
Management of Double Sensitization to Vespids in Europe.在欧洲,双蜂过敏的管理。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Feb 8;14(2):126. doi: 10.3390/toxins14020126.
3
Venom immunotherapy: an updated review.毒液免疫疗法:更新综述。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014 Jul;14(7):449. doi: 10.1007/s11882-014-0449-1.