• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较女性与男性在使用连续血流左心室辅助装置桥接移植时的结局。

Comparison of outcomes in women versus men using a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation.

机构信息

Baylor College of Medicine, St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 May;30(5):515-22. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2010.12.009
PMID:21257321
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of large, pulsatile left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has been limited in women because of their small body size.

METHODS

We compared the survival outcomes, quality of life, and adverse events in 465 patients (104 women, 361 men) with advanced systolic heart failure in their first 18 months of support with the HeartMate II (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) continuous-flow LVAD for bridge to transplantation.

RESULTS

During the first 18 months, there were no differences in survival between women and men while on LVAD support (73% ± 3% vs 73% ± 5%, p = 0.855) but fewer women (40%) underwent heart transplantation than did men (55%; p = 0.001). More women continued on support after 18 months (p = 0.007). Median duration of support was 238 days for women and 184 days for men (p = 0.003). Mortality was 20% for women and 19% for men (p = 0.89). Adverse events were similar, with the exception of hemorrhagic stroke, which occurred more frequently in women (0.10 vs 0.04 events/patient-year, p = 0.02), and device-related infections, which occurred less frequently in women (0.23 vs 0.44, p = 0.006). Functional capacity and quality of life at 6 months improved significantly in women and men.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous-flow left ventricular assistance as a bridge to transplantation is associated with similar survival rates in women and men. Differences observed in higher stroke rates and fewer infections among women require further study.

摘要

背景

由于体型较小,大型、脉动式左心室辅助装置(LVAD)在女性中的应用受到限制。

方法

我们比较了 465 例(104 例女性,361 例男性)接受 HeartMate II(Thoratec Corp,加利福尼亚州普莱森顿)连续血流 LVAD 桥接移植的晚期收缩性心力衰竭患者在最初 18 个月支持期间的生存结果、生活质量和不良事件。

结果

在 LVAD 支持期间,女性和男性的生存率没有差异(73%±3%对 73%±5%,p=0.855),但接受心脏移植的女性(40%)少于男性(55%;p=0.001)。更多的女性在 18 个月后继续接受支持(p=0.007)。女性的中位支持时间为 238 天,男性为 184 天(p=0.003)。女性的死亡率为 20%,男性为 19%(p=0.89)。不良事件相似,除了女性更常发生的出血性中风(0.10 对 0.04 例/患者年,p=0.02)和女性较少发生的与器械相关的感染(0.23 对 0.44,p=0.006)。女性和男性的 6 个月时的功能能力和生活质量均显著改善。

结论

作为桥接移植的连续血流左心室辅助与女性和男性的相似生存率相关。在女性中观察到的更高中风率和更少感染的差异需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Comparison of outcomes in women versus men using a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplantation.比较女性与男性在使用连续血流左心室辅助装置桥接移植时的结局。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 May;30(5):515-22. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.12.009. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
2
Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.心脏移植后使用持续血流左心室辅助装置的生存情况:左心室辅助装置支持时间和其他变量的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Jul;140(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 5.
3
Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置作为桥接至移植治疗可提高生存率并降低不良事件发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.030.
4
Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device.使用连续流旋转式左心室辅助装置的延长机械循环支持
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 21;54(4):312-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.055.
5
Does continuous flow left ventricular assist device technology have a positive impact on outcome pretransplant and posttransplant?持续血流左心室辅助装置技术对移植前和移植后的结果有积极影响吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Nov;82(5):1774-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.079.
6
Results of the post-U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation: a prospective study using the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).美国食品和药物管理局批准后使用连续血流左心室辅助装置桥接心脏移植的研究结果:一项使用 INTERMACS(机械循环辅助支持机构间注册)的前瞻性研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 May 10;57(19):1890-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.062.
7
Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes.HeartMate II 连续血流左心室辅助装置患者的右心衰竭:发生率、危险因素及对结局的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 May;139(5):1316-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.020. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
8
Changing outcomes in patients bridged to heart transplantation with continuous- versus pulsatile-flow ventricular assist devices: an analysis of the registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.连续流与搏动流心室辅助装置桥接心脏移植患者结局变化:国际心肺移植学会注册分析。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Aug;30(8):854-61. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.03.019. Epub 2011 May 14.
9
Neurocognitive function in destination therapy patients receiving continuous-flow vs pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist device support.接受连续流与搏动流左心室辅助装置支持的终末期心力衰竭患者的神经认知功能。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Jan;31(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.10.012.
10
Clinical outcome and bridge to transplant rate of left ventricular assist device recipient patients: comparison between continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow devices.左心室辅助装置接受患者的临床结局及移植过渡率:连续流装置与搏动流装置的比较
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Aug;34(2):275-80; discussion 280. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.02.019. Epub 2008 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex-Based Differences in Patients With Left Ventricular-Assisted Devices and Strokes.左心室辅助装置与中风患者的性别差异
JACC Adv. 2024 Jan 11;3(2):100817. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100817. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Sex and gender differences in myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy: An update.心肌炎和扩张型心肌病中的性别差异:最新进展
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 2;10:1129348. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1129348. eCollection 2023.
3
Sex-based considerations for implementation of ventricular assist device therapy.心室辅助装置治疗实施中的性别因素考量。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 18;9:1011192. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1011192. eCollection 2022.
4
Sex Differences in Left Ventricular Assist Device-related Emergency Department Encounters in the United States.美国左心室辅助装置相关急诊就诊中的性别差异。
J Card Fail. 2022 Sep;28(9):1445-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 May 27.
5
Patient factors associated with left ventricular assist device infections: A scoping review.与左心室辅助装置感染相关的患者因素:一项范围综述。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Apr;41(4):425-433. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
6
Utilization of Left Ventricular Assist Device for Congestive Heart Failure: Inputs on Demographic and Hospital Characterization From Nationwide Inpatient Sample.左心室辅助装置在充血性心力衰竭中的应用:来自全国住院患者样本的人口统计学和医院特征数据
Cureus. 2021 Jul 1;13(7):e16094. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16094. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
Sex differences in outcomes following less-invasive left ventricular assist device implantation.微创左心室辅助装置植入术后结局的性别差异。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar;10(2):255-267. doi: 10.21037/acs-2020-cfmcs-21.
8
Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review.连续流左心室辅助装置的当代结局——一项系统评价
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Mar;10(2):186-208. doi: 10.21037/acs-2021-cfmcs-35.
9
Sex Influence on Heart Failure Prognosis.性别对心力衰竭预后的影响。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 21;7:616273. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.616273. eCollection 2020.
10
Psychological Spectrum Experienced by Heart Failure Patients After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.左心室辅助装置植入后心力衰竭患者所经历的心理谱
Cureus. 2020 Aug 11;12(8):e9671. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9671.