Peripheral venous pressure as an alternative to central venous pressure in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND

Peripheral venous pressure (PVP) is strongly correlated with central venous pressure (CVP) during various surgeries. Laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum typically increases CVP. To determine whether PVP convincingly reflects changes in CVP, we evaluated the correlation between PVP and CVP in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Both CVP and PVP were measured simultaneously at predetermined time intervals during elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery in 42 patients without cardiac disease. The pairs of venous pressure measurements were analysed for correlation, and the Bland-Altman plots of repeated measures were used to evaluate the agreement between CVP and PVP.

RESULTS

A total of 420 data pairs were obtained. The overall mean CVP was 11.3 (sd 4.5) mm Hg, which was significantly lower than the measured PVP of mean 12.1 (4.5) mm Hg (P=0.005). There was a strong positive correlation between overall CVP and PVP (correlation coefficient=0.96, P<0.0001). The mean bias (PVP-CVP) corrected for repeated measurements using random-effects modelling was 0.9 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.19 mm Hg] with 95% limits of agreement of -1.2 mm Hg (95% CI -1.75 to -0.62 mm Hg) to 2.9 mm Hg (95% CI 2.35-3.48 mm Hg).

CONCLUSIONS

PVP displays a strong correlation and agreement with CVP under the increased intrathoracic pressure of pneumoperitoneum in the Trendelenburg position and may be used as an alternative to CVP in patients without cardiac disease undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.