Suppr超能文献

甲型 H1N1 大流行规划中的序贯性器官衰竭评估。

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in H1N1 pandemic planning.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):827-32. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206d548.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The H1N1 pandemic has highlighted the importance of reliable and valid triage instruments. A Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of >11 has been proposed to exclude patients from critical care resources quoting an associated mortality of >90%. We sought to assess the mortality associated with this Sequential Organ Failure Assessment threshold and the resource implications of such a triage protocol.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Three multisystem intensive care units.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients admitted from January 2003 to December 2008. Subsequently, a comparison H1N1 cohort was assembled consisting of all patients admitted in 2009 with confirmed H1N1.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment was collected daily by use of an electronic bedside clinical information system (n = 10,204 patients, 69,913 patient days). Mean admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation was 19.1. 13.4% of the cohort (9% of total patient days) had an initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment of >11. Mortality in patients with an initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of >11 was 59% (95% confidence interval: 56%, 62%). The mortality associated with an initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment >11 across diagnostic categories varied from 29% for poisoning to 67% for neurologic patients. Hospital mortality exceeded 90% only when initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment was >20 (0.2% of patients). H1N1 patients were younger, had a longer intensive care unit length of stay, and more commonly had a respiratory admission diagnosis than the nonH1N1 cohort. Hospital mortality in H1N1 patients with an initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of >11 was 31% (95% confidence interval: 5%, 56%).

CONCLUSIONS

A Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of >11 was not associated with a hospital mortality of >90% at any time during intensive care unit stay. Only a small proportion of patients have the extreme initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment values associated with a hospital mortality of >90% limiting the usefulness of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment as a triage instrument for pandemic planning. Application of a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment threshold of >11 to the recent H1N1 pandemic would have excluded patients with a markedly lower mortality than seen in a large regional cohort of intensive care unit patients.

摘要

目的

H1N1 大流行凸显了可靠和有效的分诊工具的重要性。有人提出,序贯性器官衰竭评估(Sequential Organ Failure Assessment,SOFA)评分>11 可排除接受重症监护资源的患者,因为他们的死亡率>90%。我们旨在评估这一 SOFA 评分阈值相关的死亡率以及这种分诊方案对资源的影响。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

3 个多系统重症监护病房。

患者

2003 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月连续收治的患者。随后,组建了一个比较 H1N1 的队列,其中包括 2009 年所有确诊为 H1N1 的患者。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

序贯性器官衰竭评估通过使用电子床边临床信息系统(n=10204 名患者,69913 个患者日)每日采集。入院时急性生理学和慢性健康评估的平均值为 19.1。该队列中有 13.4%(占总患者日的 9%)初始 SOFA 评分>11。初始 SOFA 评分>11 的患者死亡率为 59%(95%置信区间:56%,62%)。初始 SOFA 评分>11 的患者的死亡率因诊断类别而异,从中毒患者的 29%到神经科患者的 67%不等。只有当初始 SOFA 评分>20 时(占患者的 0.2%),医院死亡率才超过 90%。H1N1 患者比非 H1N1 患者年龄更小,在重症监护病房的住院时间更长,更常见的是呼吸系统入院诊断。H1N1 患者中初始 SOFA 评分>11 的医院死亡率为 31%(95%置信区间:5%,56%)。

结论

在重症监护期间,SOFA 评分>11 与任何时间的医院死亡率>90%均无关联。只有一小部分患者的初始 SOFA 评分极高,与医院死亡率>90%相关,这限制了 SOFA 作为大流行规划分诊工具的实用性。对最近的 H1N1 大流行应用 SOFA 评分>11 的阈值,将排除死亡率明显低于本地区重症监护患者的大量患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验