• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲型 H1N1 流感大流行期间基于 SOFA 评分的分诊对危重症患者的有效性评估。

An assessment of the validity of SOFA score based triage in H1N1 critically ill patients during an influenza pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, City Hospital, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2009 Dec;64(12):1283-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06135.x. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06135.x
PMID:19860754
Abstract

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score based triage of influenza A H1N1 critically ill patients has been proposed for surge capacity management as a guide for clinical decision making. We conducted a retrospective records review and SOFA scoring of critically ill patients with influenza A H1N1 in a mixed medical-surgical intensive care unit in an urban hospital. Eight critically ill patients with influenza A H1N1 were admitted to the intensive care unit. Their mean (range) age was 39 (26-52) years with a length of stay of 11 (3-17) days. All patients met SOFA score based triage admission criteria with a modal SOFA score of five. Five patients required invasive ventilation for a mean (range) of 5 (4-11) days. Five patients would have been considered for withdrawal of treatment using SOFA scoring guidelines at 48 h. All patients survived. We conclude that SOFA score based triage could lead to withdrawal of life support in critically ill patients who could survive with an acceptably low length of stay in the intensive care unit.

摘要

序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对甲型 H1N1 流感危重症患者进行分类,以管理应急容量,为临床决策提供指导。我们对城市医院混合内科-外科重症监护病房的甲型 H1N1 流感危重症患者进行了回顾性病历回顾和 SOFA 评分。8 例甲型 H1N1 流感危重症患者入住重症监护病房。他们的平均(范围)年龄为 39(26-52)岁,住院时间为 11(3-17)天。所有患者均符合 SOFA 评分分类入院标准,中位 SOFA 评分为 5 分。5 例患者需要有创通气,平均(范围)5(4-11)天。5 例患者在 48 小时时根据 SOFA 评分指南被认为需要撤掉治疗。所有患者均存活。我们的结论是,SOFA 评分分类可能导致对可在重症监护病房接受治疗并接受可接受的较短住院时间的危重症患者撤掉生命支持。

相似文献

1
An assessment of the validity of SOFA score based triage in H1N1 critically ill patients during an influenza pandemic.甲型 H1N1 流感大流行期间基于 SOFA 评分的分诊对危重症患者的有效性评估。
Anaesthesia. 2009 Dec;64(12):1283-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06135.x. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
2
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in H1N1 pandemic planning.甲型 H1N1 大流行规划中的序贯性器官衰竭评估。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):827-32. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318206d548.
3
High mortality in critically ill patients infected with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) with pneumonia and acute kidney injury.2009年甲型H1N1大流行性流感合并肺炎及急性肾损伤的重症患者死亡率高。
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2011 Jan;22(1):83-9.
4
Sixty-two severe and critical patients with 2009 influenza A (H1N1) in Shanghai, China.中国上海的 62 例 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感重症和危重症患者。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Jun;124(11):1662-6.
5
[Impact of pandemic H1N1 2009 influenza virus on critical care in Australia: a single centre case series].[2009年甲型H1N1大流行性流感病毒对澳大利亚重症监护的影响:单中心病例系列]
Vnitr Lek. 2009 Dec;55(12):1141-4.
6
Nutrition and functional outcomes after critical illness due to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza: a retrospective cohort study.2009 年大流行(H1N1)流感导致的危重病患者的营养和功能结局:回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care Resusc. 2011 Dec;13(4):226-31.
7
Prospective cohort study comparing sequential organ failure assessment and acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation III scoring systems for hospital mortality prediction in critically ill cirrhotic patients.前瞻性队列研究,比较序贯器官衰竭评估和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ在预测重症肝硬化患者医院死亡率方面的作用。
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Feb;60(2):160-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00634.x.
8
Application of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在入住重症监护病房的癌症患者中的应用。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009 Oct-Nov;26(5):341-6. doi: 10.1177/1049909109333041. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
9
[Correlation of a computerized SOFA score and derived measures with length of stay at an operative ICU].[计算机化序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分及衍生指标与手术重症监护病房住院时间的相关性]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2003 Jun;38(6):397-402. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39358.
10
Influenza A (H1N1) virus pneumonia in intensive care unit.重症监护病房中的甲型H1N1流感病毒肺炎
Tuberk Toraks. 2010;58(3):278-85.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting ICU Mortality Among Septic Patients Using Machine Learning Technique.使用机器学习技术预测脓毒症患者的重症监护病房死亡率。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 16;14(10):3495. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103495.
2
SOFA score performs worse than age for predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19.SOFA 评分预测 COVID-19 患者死亡率的效果不如年龄。
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0301013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301013. eCollection 2024.
3
Ethical considerations in evaluating discharge readiness from the intensive care unit.评估重症监护病房出院准备情况的伦理考虑。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Aug;31(5):896-906. doi: 10.1177/09697330231212338. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
4
The Critical Care Society of Southern Africa Consensus Guideline on ICU Triage and Rationing (ConICTri).南部非洲危重症医学会关于重症监护病房分诊与资源分配的共识指南(ConICTri)
South Afr J Crit Care. 2019 Aug 22;35(1b). doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35i1b.380. eCollection 2019.
5
The Critical Care Society of Southern Africa Consensus Statement on ICU Triage and Rationing (ConICTri).南部非洲危重症医学会关于重症监护病房分诊与资源分配的共识声明(ConICTri)
South Afr J Crit Care. 2019 Aug 15;35(1b). doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2019.v35.i1b.383. eCollection 2019.
6
Single-rater reliability of a three-dimensional instrument for decision-making in tertiary triage and ICU- prioritization-a case vignette simulation study.单一评分者在三级分诊和 ICU 优先级决策中的三维工具的可靠性:案例模拟研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jun 20;23(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02173-2.
7
[German "Triage Act"-Regulation with fatal consequences].[德国《分流法》规定造成致命后果]
Anaesthesiologie. 2023 Jun;72(6):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s00101-023-01286-0. Epub 2023 May 26.
8
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score and Mortality Prediction in Patients With Severe Respiratory Distress Secondary to COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎继发严重呼吸窘迫患者的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分与死亡率预测
Cureus. 2022 Jul 16;14(7):e26911. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26911. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Crisis Standards of Care and COVID-19: What Did We Learn? How Do We Ensure Equity? What Should We Do?危机护理标准与 COVID-19:我们学到了什么?我们如何确保公平?我们该怎么做?
NAM Perspect. 2021 Aug 30;2021. doi: 10.31478/202108e. eCollection 2021.
10
Duty to Plan: Health Care, Crisis Standards of Care, and Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.规划职责:医疗保健、危机护理标准与新型冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2
NAM Perspect. 2020 Mar 5;2020. doi: 10.31478/202003b. eCollection 2020.