Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2011 Jul;39(5):827-38. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0065-9.
Four experiments examined the monitoring accuracy of immediate and delayed judgments of learning (JOLs) under conditions of proactive interference (PI). PI was produced using paired-associate learning tasks that conformed to variations of classic A-B, A-D paradigms. Results revealed that the relative monitoring accuracy of interference items was better for delayed than for immediate JOLs. However, delayed JOLs were overconfident for interference items, but not for items devoid of interference. Intrusions retrieved prior to delayed JOLs produced inflated predictions of performance. These results show that delayed JOLs enhance monitoring accuracy in PI situations, except when intrusions are mistaken for target responses.
四项实验考察了在先行干扰（PI）条件下即时和延迟学习判断（JOL）的监测准确性。PI 是通过符合经典 A-B、A-D 范式变化的成对联想学习任务产生的。结果表明，干扰项的相对监测准确性在延迟 JOL 中优于即时 JOL。然而，延迟 JOL 对干扰项过于自信，但对没有干扰的项则不然。在延迟 JOL 之前检索到的闯入会对表现产生过高的预测。这些结果表明，延迟 JOL 增强了 PI 情况下的监测准确性，除非将闯入错误地当作目标反应。
