• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

益生菌与婴儿疫苗接种的免疫反应:一项前瞻性、安慰剂对照的初步研究。

Probiotics and the immunological response to infant vaccinations: a prospective, placebo controlled pilot study.

机构信息

Division of Paediatrics, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2011 Apr;96(4):345-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.197459. Epub 2011 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1136/adc.2010.197459
PMID:21266337
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Probiotics have been shown to be immunomodulatory and can affect antibody responses following vaccination. Several immunisations are associated with suboptimal seroconversion rates leaving a substantial part of the population exposed to infection.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of probiotic supplementation on the immune response of infants following mumps, measles, rubella and varicella vaccination.

METHODS

A randomised, placebo-controlled, double blinded prospective trial was performed in a cohort of healthy infants. Study subjects were randomly assigned to receive probiotics or placebo for a total of 5 months, starting 2 months prior to vaccination. Antibody levels against vaccine components were measured 3 months after immunisation. Treatment-related and vaccine-related adverse events were recorded.

FINDINGS

47 infants completed the study, 25 in the probiotic group and 22 in the placebo group. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of infants failing to reach protective antibody titres against the different vaccine components (three infants in the placebo group against one in the treatment group for rubella, two each for mumps, four children vs two for measles). When combining all results in both groups, a larger percentage of failures to seroconvert occurred in the placebo group (17% vs 8%, p=0.052), a result of borderline significance. The number of infants needed to treat in order to prevent one failed vaccine component was 12. There was no difference in the rate of treatment related adverse effects between the two groups. There was a significant trend toward fewer vaccine related adverse effects in the treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral probiotics given to infants during the period of immunisation do not interfere with the immune response to mumps, measles, rubella and varicella vaccine, and may improve seroconversion rates.

摘要

背景

益生菌具有免疫调节作用,可影响疫苗接种后的抗体反应。有几种免疫接种与不理想的血清转化率有关,这使得相当一部分人群面临感染风险。

目的

评估益生菌补充剂对接受腮腺炎、麻疹、风疹和水痘疫苗接种的婴儿免疫反应的影响。

方法

在一组健康婴儿中进行了一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲前瞻性试验。研究对象被随机分配接受益生菌或安慰剂治疗,共 5 个月,从接种前 2 个月开始。在免疫接种后 3 个月测量针对疫苗成分的抗体水平。记录与治疗相关和与疫苗相关的不良事件。

结果

47 名婴儿完成了研究,其中 25 名在益生菌组,22 名在安慰剂组。在未能达到针对不同疫苗成分的保护性抗体滴度的婴儿数量方面,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异(安慰剂组有 3 名婴儿对风疹,治疗组有 1 名婴儿,2 名婴儿对腮腺炎,4 名婴儿对麻疹,2 名婴儿)。当将两组的所有结果合并时,安慰剂组的血清转化率失败率更高(17%对 8%,p=0.052),这是一个边缘显著的结果。为了预防一个疫苗成分失败,需要治疗的婴儿数量为 12。两组之间治疗相关不良事件的发生率没有差异。治疗组疫苗相关不良事件的发生率呈显著下降趋势。

结论

在免疫期间给予婴儿口服益生菌不会干扰腮腺炎、麻疹、风疹和水痘疫苗的免疫反应,并且可能提高血清转化率。

相似文献

1
Probiotics and the immunological response to infant vaccinations: a prospective, placebo controlled pilot study.益生菌与婴儿疫苗接种的免疫反应:一项前瞻性、安慰剂对照的初步研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2011 Apr;96(4):345-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.197459. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
2
Safety and immunogenicity of concurrent administration of live attenuated influenza vaccine with measles-mumps-rubella and varicella vaccines to infants 12 to 15 months of age.12至15月龄婴儿同时接种减毒活流感疫苗与麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹疫苗和水痘疫苗的安全性和免疫原性。
Pediatrics. 2008 Mar;121(3):508-16. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1064.
3
Safety and immunogenicity of early vaccination with two doses of tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine in healthy children from 9 months of age.9月龄健康儿童早期接种两剂四价麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹-水痘(MMRV)疫苗的安全性和免疫原性。
Infection. 2007 Oct;35(5):326-33. doi: 10.1007/s15010-007-6337-z. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
4
Immunogenicity and safety of a varicella vaccine, Okavax, and a trivalent measles, mumps and rubella vaccine, MMR-II, administered concomitantly in healthy Filipino children aged 12-24 months.在12至24个月大的健康菲律宾儿童中同时接种水痘疫苗Okavax和三价麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹疫苗MMR-II的免疫原性和安全性。
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003 Sep;34(3):589-97.
5
Immunogenicity and safety of measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine followed by one dose of varicella vaccine in children aged 15 months-2 years or 2-6 years primed with measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine.在15个月至2岁或2至6岁已接种麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹(MMR)疫苗的儿童中,接种麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹-水痘(MMRV)疫苗后再接种一剂水痘疫苗的免疫原性和安全性。
Vaccine. 2009 Jan 14;27(3):446-53. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.064. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
6
Measles-mumps-rubella and varicella vaccine responses in extremely preterm infants.极早产儿对麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹疫苗和水痘疫苗的反应
Pediatrics. 2007 Mar;119(3):e574-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2241.
7
A combination measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine (ProQuad) given to 4- to 6-year-old healthy children vaccinated previously with M-M-RII and Varivax.一种麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹和水痘联合疫苗(ProQuad),用于先前已接种过M-M-RII和Varivax的4至6岁健康儿童。
Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):265-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0092.
8
Immunogenicity and safety of a measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine following a 4-week or a 12-month interval between two doses.两剂麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹-水痘疫苗之间间隔 4 周或 12 个月的免疫原性和安全性。
Vaccine. 2011 May 17;29(22):3842-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.02.067. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
9
The safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine in healthy children: a study of manufacturing consistency and persistence of antibody.一种四价麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹和水痘疫苗在健康儿童中的安全性和免疫原性:生产一致性及抗体持久性研究
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Jul;25(7):615-22. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000220209.35074.0b.
10
Safety and immunogenicity of a measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine given as a second dose in children up to six years of age.在6岁及以下儿童中作为第二剂接种的麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹-水痘疫苗的安全性和免疫原性。
Vaccine. 2009 May 5;27(20):2701-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.044. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Deciphering the Potential of Probiotics in Vaccines.解读益生菌在疫苗中的潜力。
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jun 26;12(7):711. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12070711.
2
Understanding the influence of the microbiome on childhood infections.了解微生物组对儿童感染的影响。
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2024 Jul;22(7):529-545. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2024.2340664. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
3
Dietary intervention with functional foods modulating gut microbiota for improving the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.使用调节肠道微生物群的功能性食品进行饮食干预以提高新冠疫苗的效力。
Heliyon. 2023 May;9(5):e15668. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15668. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
4
Efficacy of alone or in multi-strain probiotic formulations during early life and beyond.单一菌株或多菌株益生菌制剂在生命早期及生命后期的功效。
Gut Microbes. 2023 Jan-Dec;15(1):2186098. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2186098.
5
Harnessing Innate Immunity to Treat Infections: Heat-Killed as a Novel Biotherapeutic.利用先天免疫治疗感染:热灭活作为一种新型的生物治疗方法。
Cells. 2023 Feb 9;12(4):560. doi: 10.3390/cells12040560.
6
Probiotics and probiotic-based vaccines: A novel approach for improving vaccine efficacy.益生菌及基于益生菌的疫苗:提高疫苗效力的新方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 13;9:940454. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.940454. eCollection 2022.
7
The influence of prebiotic or probiotic supplementation on antibody titers after influenza vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.益生元或益生菌补充剂对流感疫苗接种后抗体滴度的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018 Jan 25;12:217-230. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S155110. eCollection 2018.
8
Adjuvant Probiotics and the Intestinal Microbiome: Enhancing Vaccines and Immunotherapy Outcomes.辅助益生菌与肠道微生物群:增强疫苗和免疫治疗效果
Vaccines (Basel). 2017 Dec 11;5(4):50. doi: 10.3390/vaccines5040050.
9
Probiotics, antibiotics and the immune responses to vaccines.益生菌、抗生素与对疫苗的免疫反应
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Jun 19;370(1671). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0144.
10
Effects of Bifidobacterium supplementation on intestinal microbiota composition and the immune response in healthy infants.补充双歧杆菌对健康婴儿肠道菌群组成和免疫应答的影响。
World J Pediatr. 2016 May;12(2):177-82. doi: 10.1007/s12519-015-0025-3. Epub 2015 Apr 6.