• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化德国认证乳腺癌中心的乳腺癌护理质量:2003-2009 年的基准分析,特别关注放射肿瘤学的跨学科专业。

Optimizing the quality of breast cancer care at certified german breast centers: a benchmarking analysis for 2003-2009 with a particular focus on the interdisciplinary specialty of radiation oncology.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Strahlenther Onkol. 2011 Feb;187(2):89-99. doi: 10.1007/s00066-010-2202-6. Epub 2011 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00066-010-2202-6
PMID:21267530
Abstract

PURPOSE

A voluntary, external, science-based benchmarking program was established in Germany in 2003 to analyze and improve the quality of breast cancer (BC) care. Based on recent data from 2009, we aim to show that such analyses can also be performed for individual interdisciplinary specialties, such as radiation oncology (RO).

METHODS

Breast centers were invited to participate in the benchmarking program. Nine guideline-based quality indicators (QIs) were initially defined, reviewed annually, and modified, expanded, or abandoned accordingly. QI changes over time were analyzed descriptively, with particular emphasis on relevance to radiation oncology.

RESULTS

During the 2003-2009 study period, there were marked increases in breast center participation and postoperatively confirmed primary BCs. Starting from 9 process QIs, 15 QIs were developed by 2009 as surrogate indicators of long-term outcome. During 2003-2009, 2/7 RO-relevant QIs (radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery or after mastectomy) showed considerable increases (from 20 to 85% and 8 to 70%, respectively). Another three, initially high QIs practically reached the required levels.

CONCLUSION

The current data confirm proof-of-concept for the established benchmarking program, which allows participating institutions to be compared and changes in quality of BC care to be tracked over time. Overall, marked QI increases suggest that BC care in Germany improved from 2003-2009. Moreover, it has become possible for the first time to demonstrate improvements in the quality of BC care longitudinally for individual breast centers. In addition, subgroups of relevant QIs can be used to demonstrate the progress achieved, but also the need for further improvement, in specific interdisciplinary specialties.

摘要

目的

2003 年,德国建立了一个自愿的、外部的、基于科学的基准测试计划,旨在分析和提高乳腺癌(BC)护理质量。基于 2009 年的最新数据,我们旨在表明,这种分析也可以针对个别跨学科专业进行,如放射肿瘤学(RO)。

方法

邀请乳腺中心参加基准测试计划。最初定义了九个基于指南的质量指标(QIs),每年进行审查,并相应地进行修改、扩展或放弃。通过描述性分析来分析 QI 随时间的变化,特别强调与放射肿瘤学的相关性。

结果

在 2003-2009 年的研究期间,乳腺中心的参与度和术后确诊的原发性 BC 显著增加。从 9 个过程 QIs 开始,到 2009 年发展为 15 个 QIs,作为长期结果的替代指标。在 2003-2009 年期间,2/7 个与 RO 相关的 QIs(保乳手术后或乳房切除术后的放疗)显示出相当大的增加(分别从 20%增加到 85%和从 8%增加到 70%)。另外三个最初的高 QI 实际上达到了所需的水平。

结论

目前的数据证实了既定基准测试计划的概念验证,该计划允许对参与机构进行比较,并跟踪 BC 护理质量随时间的变化。总体而言,QIs 的显著增加表明,2003-2009 年德国的 BC 护理质量有所提高。此外,现在首次有可能对各个乳腺中心的 BC 护理质量进行纵向改善。此外,相关 QIs 的子组可用于证明特定跨学科专业取得的进展,但也需要进一步改进。

相似文献

1
Optimizing the quality of breast cancer care at certified german breast centers: a benchmarking analysis for 2003-2009 with a particular focus on the interdisciplinary specialty of radiation oncology.优化德国认证乳腺癌中心的乳腺癌护理质量:2003-2009 年的基准分析,特别关注放射肿瘤学的跨学科专业。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2011 Feb;187(2):89-99. doi: 10.1007/s00066-010-2202-6. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
2
Benchmarking the quality of breast cancer care in a nationwide voluntary system: the first five-year results (2003-2007) from Germany as a proof of concept.在全国性自愿体系中对乳腺癌护理质量进行基准评估:来自德国的首个五年结果(2003 - 2007年)作为概念验证。
BMC Cancer. 2008 Dec 2;8:358. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-358.
3
Quality of care in breast cancer centers: results of benchmarking by the German Cancer Society and German Society for Breast Diseases.乳腺癌中心的医疗质量:德国癌症协会和德国乳腺疾病协会的基准化评估结果
Breast. 2015 Apr;24(2):118-23. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
4
Time trends (2006-2015) of quality indicators in EUSOMA-certified breast centres.欧洲乳腺外科协会(EUSOMA)认证乳腺中心质量指标的时间趋势(2006 - 2015年)
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;85:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.040. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
5
Documented quality of care in certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany: German Cancer Society benchmarking report for 2013.德国认证结直肠癌中心的医疗质量记录:德国癌症协会2013年基准报告
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Apr;29(4):511-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1842-x. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
6
[Development of guideline-based quality indicators: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitating factors from the perspective of S3-guideline authors].[基于指南的质量指标的制定:从S3指南作者角度对障碍和促进因素的定性研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
7
Quality indicators in breast cancer care: An update from the EUSOMA working group.乳腺癌护理质量指标:EUSOMA工作组的最新报告。
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Nov;86:59-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
8
Monitoring Breast Cancer Care Quality at National and Local Level Using the French National Cancer Cohort.利用法国国家癌症队列监测国家和地方层面的乳腺癌护理质量。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Oct;22(7):e832-e841. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.05.006. Epub 2022 May 21.
9
[The Quality indicator project of the German college of general practice and family medicine (DEGAM): development of indicators based on the guidelines dementia, neck pain and sore throat].[德国全科与家庭医学学院(DEGAM)的质量指标项目:基于痴呆、颈部疼痛和喉咙痛指南制定指标]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(1):74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
10
Establishing achievable benchmarks for quality improvement in systemic therapy for early-stage breast cancer.确立早期乳腺癌全身治疗质量改进的可实现基准。
Cancer. 2017 Oct 1;123(19):3772-3780. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30804. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The European Pediatric Surgical Audit: Improving Quality of Care in Rare Congenital Malformations.欧洲儿科外科审计:提高罕见先天性畸形的护理质量
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Oct;35(5):426-434. doi: 10.1055/a-2551-2056. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Developing quality indicators for cancer hospitals in China: a national modified Delphi process.中国癌症医院质量指标的制定:一项全国性的改良德尔菲法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 9;14(4):e082930. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082930.
3
Benchmarking facilities providing care: An international overview of initiatives.

本文引用的文献

1
DEGRO Practical Guidelines for palliative radiotherapy of breast cancer patients: brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.DEGRO 实践指南:乳腺癌患者姑息放疗——脑转移和软脑膜癌病。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2010 Feb;186(2):63-69. doi: 10.1007/s00066-010-2100-y. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
2
Survival benefit with radiation therapy in node-positive breast carcinoma patients.淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者接受放射治疗的生存获益。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2009 Oct;185(10):656-62. doi: 10.1007/s00066-009-2047-z. Epub 2009 Oct 6.
3
Local relapse after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: effects on survival parameters.
对提供医疗服务的机构进行基准评估:国际举措概述。
SAGE Open Med. 2015 Sep 23;3:2050312115601692. doi: 10.1177/2050312115601692. eCollection 2015.
4
Convergence with SEER database achieved by a breast cancer network: a longitudinal benchmark of 5-year relative survival.一个乳腺癌网络实现了与监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的融合:5年相对生存率的纵向基准。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun;141(6):1109-18. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1879-9. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
5
Timing of radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery: outcome of 1393 patients at a single institution.保乳手术后放疗的时机:单机构 1393 例患者的结果。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2014 Apr;190(4):352-7. doi: 10.1007/s00066-013-0540-x. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
6
Using relative survival measures for cross-sectional and longitudinal benchmarks of countries, states, and districts: the BenchRelSurv- and BenchRelSurvPlot-macros.使用相对生存测量来评估国家、州和地区的横断和纵向基准:BenchRelSurv- 和 BenchRelSurvPlot-宏。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jan 14;13:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-34.
7
Development and feasibility of a set of quality indicators relative to the timeliness and organisation of care for new breast cancer patients undergoing surgery.一套与新乳腺癌手术患者护理及时性和组织性相关的质量指标的制定与可行性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 21;12:167. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-167.
8
Margins! Margins. Margins? How Important Is Margin Status in Breast-Preserving Therapy?切缘!切缘。切缘?切缘状态在保乳治疗中有多重要?
Breast Care (Basel). 2011 Oct;6(5):359-362. doi: 10.1159/000333145. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
9
The Challenge of Integrating Radiotherapy in the Multimodal Treatment of Breast Cancer.在乳腺癌多模式治疗中整合放射治疗的挑战
Breast Care (Basel). 2011 Oct;6(5):345-346. doi: 10.1159/000334227. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
10
Postoperative periclavicular radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes. Outcome and morbidity.1-3 个腋窝淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌患者术后锁骨旁放疗。结果和并发症。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2012 May;188(5):417-23. doi: 10.1007/s00066-012-0083-6. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
保乳手术和放疗后的局部复发:对生存参数的影响。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2009 Jul;185(7):431-7. doi: 10.1007/s00066-009-1983-y. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
4
DEGRO practice guidelines for palliative radiotherapy of metastatic breast cancer: bone metastases and metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC).DEGRO转移性乳腺癌姑息性放疗实践指南:骨转移和转移性脊髓压迫(MSCC)
Strahlenther Onkol. 2009 Jul;185(7):417-24. doi: 10.1007/s00066-009-2044-2. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
5
Certification of breast centres in Germany: proof of concept for a prototypical example of quality assurance in multidisciplinary cancer care.德国乳腺中心认证:多学科癌症护理质量保证典型示例的概念验证
BMC Cancer. 2009 Jul 14;9:228. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-228.
6
Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center.在一所大学综合癌症中心实施肿瘤学质量实践倡议。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3802-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6770. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
7
The effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on mortality differs according to primary tumor location in women with node-positive breast cancer.辅助放疗对死亡率的影响因淋巴结阳性乳腺癌女性的原发肿瘤位置而异。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2009 Mar;185(3):161-8; discussion 169. doi: 10.1007/s00066-009-1921-z. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
8
Benchmarking the quality of breast cancer care in a nationwide voluntary system: the first five-year results (2003-2007) from Germany as a proof of concept.在全国性自愿体系中对乳腺癌护理质量进行基准评估:来自德国的首个五年结果(2003 - 2007年)作为概念验证。
BMC Cancer. 2008 Dec 2;8:358. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-358.
9
DEGRO practical guidelines for radiotherapy of breast cancer II. Postmastectomy radiotherapy, irradiation of regional lymphatics, and treatment of locally advanced disease.DEGRO乳腺癌放射治疗实用指南II. 乳房切除术后放疗、区域淋巴结照射及局部晚期疾病的治疗
Strahlenther Onkol. 2008 Jul;184(7):347-53. doi: 10.1007/s00066-008-1901-8.
10
American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures.美国临床肿瘤学会/美国国立综合癌症网络质量指标
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 20;26(21):3631-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5068.