Skalicka Lenka, Lubanda Jean-Claude, Jirat Simon, Varejka Petr, Beran Stanislav, Dostal Ondrej, Prochazka Pavel, Mrazek Vratislav, Linhart Ales
2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Angiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, U nemocnice 2, 128-08, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
Heart Vessels. 2011 Nov;26(6):616-21. doi: 10.1007/s00380-010-0112-2. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is caused by compression of peripheral nerves and vascular structures along their course through the upper thoracic aperture to the axilla. The aim of our study was to analyze long-term outcomes of different treatments stratified by symptom severity. We performed a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 73 consecutive patients treated at our institution presenting with TOS-associated venous thrombotic events. Treatment strategies and immediate outcome analysis were completed by long-term follow-up with duplex ultrasound controls 6-12 months after the initial clinical event. Conservative therapy was started in mildly symptomatic patients (n = 32), of which 12 required endovascular procedures because of treatment failure. Endovascular treatment was attempted in all highly symptomatic patients and in those with conservative treatment failure (n = 53), of which 12 required acute surgical intervention. Elective surgical treatment was indicated in 30 other patients because of persistent symptoms. Surgery was associated with a significantly lower rate of the ultrasound-detected signs of persisting vascular compression. However, the rate of persisting clinical symptoms was comparable to those treated only by endovascular or conservative therapy. Our data demonstrate that initial endovascular treatment proposed as first line therapy to highly symptomatic subjects and in those with conservative treatment failure improves the symptoms in 77% of patients avoiding the need of acute surgery. Acute and elective surgical decompression leads to lower rates of vascular compression signs without significant amelioration of persisting clinical symptoms as compared to endovascular or conservative therapy.
胸廓出口综合征(TOS)是由周围神经和血管结构在通过胸廓上口至腋窝的行程中受到压迫所致。我们研究的目的是分析根据症状严重程度分层的不同治疗方法的长期疗效。我们对在我院接受治疗的73例连续发生TOS相关静脉血栓事件的患者进行了回顾性分析。在初始临床事件发生6 - 12个月后,通过双功超声对照进行长期随访,完成治疗策略和即时疗效分析。对症状较轻的患者(n = 32)开始进行保守治疗,其中12例因治疗失败需要进行血管内介入治疗。对所有症状严重的患者以及保守治疗失败的患者(n = 53)尝试进行血管内治疗,其中12例需要进行急诊手术干预。另外30例患者因症状持续而接受择期手术治疗。手术与超声检测到的持续性血管压迫体征发生率显著降低相关。然而,持续性临床症状的发生率与仅接受血管内治疗或保守治疗的患者相当。我们的数据表明,对于症状严重的患者以及保守治疗失败的患者,将初始血管内治疗作为一线治疗方法可使77%的患者症状改善,避免了急诊手术的需要。与血管内治疗或保守治疗相比,急诊和择期手术减压导致血管压迫体征发生率降低,但持续性临床症状并无显著改善。