• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估自动红细胞采集和药物使用过程中面部潮红情况的供者调查。

Donor survey to assess facial flushing during automated red cell collections and medication use.

作者信息

Eder Anne F, Mitchell Tanya, Dy Beth, Herron Ross M, Ellen Wissel Mary, Lightfoot Thomas, Jo Drew Mary, Mair David

机构信息

American Red Cross, Biomedical Services, National Headquarters, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Apher. 2011;26(3):116-22. doi: 10.1002/jca.20279. Epub 2011 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1002/jca.20279
PMID:21268095
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We conducted a donor survey to assess the occurrence of facial flushing and other symptoms during automated 2-U red cell collections (2RBC) and plateletpheresis (PLT) procedures and evaluated the possible association of the reactions with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or with the collection technology.

METHODS

An online survey was developed using Zoomerang to capture details of the donors' experience and medication use after 2RBC or PLT donations in regional blood centers of the American Red Cross.

RESULTS

Between 12/16/09 and 4/19/10, 1,299 donors in five American Red Cross blood center regions completed an online survey (739 2RBC, 4.2% total registrations; 560 PLT, 2.3% total registrations). Facial flushing was reported by 29 donors, and was more likely associated with 2RBC than PLT procedures (3.0% vs. 1.3%, P = 0.03). Facial flushing with 2RBC donation was reported by eight of 72 (11%) donors on ACE inhibitors; and 14 of 667 (2%) donors who were not taking ACE inhibitors (P = 0.001). The incidence of facial flushing reactions with PLT donation was less than 2% whether donors reported ACEI inhibitor use or not. More than 95% of the donors reported their intent to donate again, regardless of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Facial flushing was more often reported by 2RBC donors taking ACE inhibitors than other donors [11% vs. 2%; P = 0.001]; and was uncommon among PLT donors, irrespective of ACE inhibitor use (<2%). All blood donors should be informed of the potential for common, minor side effects of the collection procedure and the possible but rare occurrence of more medically serious complications.

摘要

背景

我们进行了一项献血者调查,以评估在自动采集2单位红细胞(2RBC)和血小板单采(PLT)过程中面部潮红及其他症状的发生情况,并评估这些反应与血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂或采集技术之间的可能关联。

方法

使用Zoomerang开发了一项在线调查,以获取美国红十字会地区血液中心2RBC或PLT献血后献血者的经历及用药情况的详细信息。

结果

在2009年12月16日至2010年4月19日期间,美国红十字会五个血液中心地区的1299名献血者完成了在线调查(739例2RBC,占总登记人数的4.2%;560例PLT,占总登记人数的2.3%)。29名献血者报告有面部潮红,且2RBC采集过程比PLT采集过程更易出现面部潮红(3.0%对1.3%,P = 0.03)。72名服用ACE抑制剂的2RBC献血者中有8名(11%)报告面部潮红;667名未服用ACE抑制剂的献血者中有14名(2%)报告面部潮红(P = 0.001)。无论献血者是否报告使用ACEI抑制剂,PLT献血时面部潮红反应的发生率均低于2%。超过95%的献血者表示无论有无症状都打算再次献血。

结论

服用ACE抑制剂的2RBC献血者比其他献血者更常报告面部潮红[11%对2%;P = 0.001];PLT献血者中面部潮红不常见,无论是否使用ACE抑制剂(<2%)。应告知所有献血者采集过程可能出现常见、轻微副作用以及更严重医学并发症可能但罕见的发生情况。

相似文献

1
Donor survey to assess facial flushing during automated red cell collections and medication use.评估自动红细胞采集和药物使用过程中面部潮红情况的供者调查。
J Clin Apher. 2011;26(3):116-22. doi: 10.1002/jca.20279. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
2
The relative safety of automated two-unit red blood cell procedures and manual whole-blood collection in young donors.年轻献血者中自动双单位红细胞采集程序与手工全血采集的相对安全性。
Transfusion. 2009 Sep;49(9):1874-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02237.x. Epub 2009 May 29.
3
The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of blood donation reported in 2006.美国红十字会献血者血液监测项目:2006年报告的献血并发症
Transfusion. 2008 Sep;48(9):1809-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01811.x. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
4
Donor retention as a function of donor reactions to whole-blood and automated double red cell collections.作为献血者对全血和自动双份红细胞采集反应的函数的献血者保留率。
Transfusion. 2007 Jun;47(6):995-1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01223.x.
5
Modeling red cell procurement with both double-red-cell and whole-blood collection and the impact of European travel deferral on units available for transfusion.采用双红细胞采集和全血采集对红细胞采供进行建模以及欧洲旅行延期对可用于输血的单位的影响。
Transfusion. 2007 Nov;47(11):2025-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01426.x.
6
Frequent plateletpheresis does not clinically significantly decrease platelet counts in donors.频繁进行血小板单采术在临床上并不会显著降低献血者的血小板计数。
Transfusion. 2007 Sep;47(9):1601-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01330.x.
7
Adverse events and retention of donors of double red cell units by apheresis.双份红细胞单采术献血者的不良反应和保留率。
Blood Transfus. 2016 Sep;14(5):391-9. doi: 10.2450/2016.0237-15. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
8
Bacterial screening of apheresis platelets and the residual risk of septic transfusion reactions: the American Red Cross experience (2004-2006).单采血小板的细菌筛查及感染性输血反应的残余风险:美国红十字会的经验(2004 - 2006年)
Transfusion. 2007 Jul;47(7):1134-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01248.x.
9
The safety profile of automated collections: an analysis of more than 1 million collections.自动采集的安全性概况:对超过100万次采集的分析
Transfusion. 2007 Jun;47(6):1002-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01224.x.
10
Prospective, paired crossover comparison of multiple, single-needle plateletpheresis procedures with the Amicus and Trima Accel cell separators.使用Amicus和Trima Accel血细胞分离机对多种单针血小板采集程序进行前瞻性配对交叉比较。
Transfusion. 2006 Nov;46(11):2004-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.01009.x.