• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为献血者对全血和自动双份红细胞采集反应的函数的献血者保留率。

Donor retention as a function of donor reactions to whole-blood and automated double red cell collections.

作者信息

Rader Aaron W, France Christopher R, Carlson Bruce

机构信息

American Red Cross Blood Services, Central Ohio Region, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2007 Jun;47(6):995-1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01223.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01223.x
PMID:17524088
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although reactions to whole-blood (WB) donation are known to decrease donor retention, potential effects of reactions to automated double red cell (2RBC) donation upon retention have not been investigated.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The authors investigated effects of donor status (first-time, experienced) and reactions (absent, present) upon retention of all male allogeneic WB and 2RBC donors (n = 45,296) donating within the American Red Cross Central Ohio Region during a 12-month period. Donor age, race, and status (first-time, experienced); phlebotomist's reaction rating; and phlebotomy procedure (WB, 2RBC) were collected for the initial donation by each donor. Dates of any donation attempts in the 12 months starting from the donor's first eligible date after the initial donation were also collected.

RESULTS

On average, WB donors were less likely to react and more likely to donate again and returned more quickly to donate than 2RBC donors, even after accounting for differential delays in eligibility. Reactions decreased the likelihood of repeat donation among all first-time donors regardless of initial phlebotomy procedure. Among experienced donors, however, reactions depressed retention of WB donors by 27.6 percent, whereas reactions lowered retention of 2RBC donors by just 3.6 percent.

CONCLUSION

Although 2RBC donors were more likely to react, first-time 2RBC donors were no more affected by reactions than first-time WB donors. Experienced WB donors suffered a larger drop in retention as a function of reactions, in fact, than did experienced donors who gave 2RBC donations. Potential reasons for this data pattern require further investigation.

摘要

背景

虽然已知全血(WB)捐献反应会降低献血者保留率,但自动双红细胞(2RBC)捐献反应对保留率的潜在影响尚未得到研究。

研究设计与方法

作者调查了献血者状态(首次、有经验)和反应(无、有)对美国红十字会俄亥俄州中部地区12个月内所有男性异体全血和双红细胞献血者(n = 45,296)保留率的影响。收集了每位献血者首次献血时的年龄、种族和状态(首次、有经验);采血人员的反应评分;以及采血程序(全血、双红细胞)。还收集了从首次献血后的首次合格日期开始的12个月内任何献血尝试的日期。

结果

平均而言,即使考虑到资格差异延迟,全血献血者发生反应的可能性较小,再次献血的可能性较大,且比双红细胞献血者更快恢复献血。反应降低了所有首次献血者再次献血的可能性,无论最初的采血程序如何。然而,在有经验的献血者中,反应使全血献血者的保留率降低了27.6%,而反应仅使双红细胞献血者的保留率降低了3.6%。

结论

虽然双红细胞献血者更有可能发生反应,但首次双红细胞献血者受反应的影响并不比首次全血献血者更大。事实上,有经验的全血献血者因反应导致的保留率下降幅度比有经验的双红细胞献血者更大。这种数据模式的潜在原因需要进一步调查。

相似文献

1
Donor retention as a function of donor reactions to whole-blood and automated double red cell collections.作为献血者对全血和自动双份红细胞采集反应的函数的献血者保留率。
Transfusion. 2007 Jun;47(6):995-1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01223.x.
2
The relative safety of automated two-unit red blood cell procedures and manual whole-blood collection in young donors.年轻献血者中自动双单位红细胞采集程序与手工全血采集的相对安全性。
Transfusion. 2009 Sep;49(9):1874-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02237.x. Epub 2009 May 29.
3
Adverse events and retention of donors of double red cell units by apheresis.双份红细胞单采术献血者的不良反应和保留率。
Blood Transfus. 2016 Sep;14(5):391-9. doi: 10.2450/2016.0237-15. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
Donor survey to assess facial flushing during automated red cell collections and medication use.评估自动红细胞采集和药物使用过程中面部潮红情况的供者调查。
J Clin Apher. 2011;26(3):116-22. doi: 10.1002/jca.20279. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
5
Long-Term Course of Haemoglobin and Ferritin Values in High-Frequency Donors of Whole Blood and Double Erythrocyte Apheresis.全血高频献血者及双份红细胞单采献血者血红蛋白和铁蛋白值的长期变化过程
Transfus Med Hemother. 2021 Mar;48(2):71-78. doi: 10.1159/000509026. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
6
Adverse reactions to allogeneic whole blood donation by 16- and 17-year-olds.16和17岁青少年异体全血捐献的不良反应。
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2279-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2279.
7
Modeling red cell procurement with both double-red-cell and whole-blood collection and the impact of European travel deferral on units available for transfusion.采用双红细胞采集和全血采集对红细胞采供进行建模以及欧洲旅行延期对可用于输血的单位的影响。
Transfusion. 2007 Nov;47(11):2025-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01426.x.
8
Offering new and returned donors the option to give plasma: implications for donor retention and donor adverse events.为新老献血者提供捐献血浆的选择:对献血者保留率和献血者不良事件的影响。
Vox Sang. 2021 Mar;116(3):273-280. doi: 10.1111/vox.12977. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
9
Donors who react may not come back: analysis of repeat donation as a function of phlebotomist ratings of vasovagal reactions.有反应的献血者可能不会再来献血:将重复献血作为静脉穿刺采血人员对血管迷走神经反应评分的函数进行分析。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2005 Oct;33(2):99-106. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2005.02.005.
10
Negative experiences and donor return: an examination of the role of asking for something different.负面经历与捐赠者回访:对提出不同要求所起作用的考察
Transfusion. 2016 Mar;56(3):605-13. doi: 10.1111/trf.13390. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency of vasovagal reactions in whole blood donation and contributing factors.全血捐献中血管迷走神经反应的发生率及相关因素。
Med Int (Lond). 2025 Feb 18;5(3):22. doi: 10.3892/mi.2025.221. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
2
Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial.全血献血者血管迷走反应预防干预措施的评估:一项大型整群随机试验的原理和设计。
Trials. 2023 Aug 10;24(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z.
3
Source Plasma Donation: The Experience of the Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization.
来源血浆捐献:伊朗输血组织的经验
Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2022 Jul 1;16(3):151-156. doi: 10.18502/ijhoscr.v16i3.10137.
4
2016 proceedings of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's scientific priorities in pediatric transfusion medicine.2016年美国国立心肺血液研究所儿科输血医学科学优先事项会议记录
Transfusion. 2017 Jun;57(6):1568-1581. doi: 10.1111/trf.14100. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
5
Adverse events and retention of donors of double red cell units by apheresis.双份红细胞单采术献血者的不良反应和保留率。
Blood Transfus. 2016 Sep;14(5):391-9. doi: 10.2450/2016.0237-15. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
6
Donor Hemovigilance with Blood Donation.献血者血液监测
Transfus Med Hemother. 2015 May;42(3):181-92. doi: 10.1159/000371614. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
7
Management of young blood donors.年轻献血者的管理。
Transfus Med Hemother. 2014 Jul;41(4):284-95. doi: 10.1159/000364849. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
8
Donor Hemovigilance during Preparatory Plasmapheresis.供者血液警戒在预备性血浆分离术期间。
Transfus Med Hemother. 2014 Apr;41(2):123-33. doi: 10.1159/000357991. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
9
A single-centre study of vasovagal reaction in blood donors: Influence of age, sex, donation status, weight, total blood volume and volume of blood collected.一项关于献血者血管迷走神经反应的单中心研究:年龄、性别、献血状态、体重、总血容量及采血量的影响
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2014 Jan;8(1):43-6. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.126690.
10
Risk factors for complications in donors at first and repeat whole blood donation: a cohort study with assessment of the impact on donor return.首次和重复全血捐献者并发症的风险因素:队列研究评估对供者回归的影响
Blood Transfus. 2014 Jan;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):s28-36. doi: 10.2450/2013.0262-12. Epub 2013 Jun 3.