Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Mar;98(3):373-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.11.017. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
To investigate the dosimetric impact of not editing auto-contours of the elective neck and organs at risk (OAR), generated with atlas-based autosegmentation (ABAS) (Elekta software) for head and neck cancer patients.
For nine patients ABAS auto-contours and auto-contours edited by two observers were available. Based on the non-edited auto-contours clinically acceptable IMRT plans were constructed (designated 'ABAS plans'). These plans were then evaluated for the two edited structure sets, by quantifying the percentage of the neck-PTV receiving more than 95% of the prescribed dose (V(95)) and the near-minimum dose (D(99)) in the neck PTV. Dice coefficients and mean contour distances were calculated to quantify the similarity of ABAS auto-contours with the structure sets edited by observer 1 and observer 2. To study the dosimetric importance of editing OAR auto-contours a new IMRT plan was generated for each patient-observer combination, based on the observer's edited CTV and the non-edited salivary gland auto-contours. For each plan mean doses for the non-edited glands were compared with doses for the same glands edited by the observer.
For both observers, edited neck CTVs were larger than ABAS auto-contours (p≤ 0.04), by a mean of 8.7%. When evaluating ABAS plans on the PTVs of the edited structure sets, V(95) reduced by 7.2%±5.4% (1 SD) (p<0.03). The mean reduction in D(99) was 14.2 Gy (range 1-54 Gy). Even for Dice coefficients >0.8 and mean contour distances <1mm, reductions in D(99) up to 11Gy were observed. For treatment plans based on observer PTVs and non-edited auto-contoured salivary glands, the mean doses in the edited glands differed by only -0.6 Gy±1.0 Gy (p=0.06).
Editing of auto-contoured neck CTVs generated by ABAS is required to avoid large underdosages in target volumes. Often used similarity measures for evaluation of auto-contouring algorithms, such as dice coefficients, do not predict well for expected PTV underdose. Editing of salivary glands is less important as mean doses achieved for non-edited glands predict well for edited structures.
研究头颈部癌症患者基于图谱的自动分割(ABAS)(Elekta 软件)生成的选择性颈部和危及器官(OAR)自动轮廓不编辑的剂量学影响。
对于 9 名患者,ABAS 自动轮廓和由两名观察者编辑的自动轮廓可用。基于非编辑的自动轮廓,构建了临床可接受的调强放疗计划(指定为“ABAS 计划”)。然后,通过量化颈部 PTV 中接受处方剂量的 95%以上的百分比(V(95))和颈部 PTV 中的近最小剂量(D(99)),评估了这两个编辑的结构集的 ABAS 自动轮廓。计算 Dice 系数和平均轮廓距离,以量化 ABAS 自动轮廓与观察者 1 和观察者 2 编辑的结构集的相似性。为了研究编辑 OAR 自动轮廓的剂量学重要性,基于每个患者-观察者组合的编辑 CTV 和非编辑唾液腺自动轮廓,为每个患者-观察者组合生成了一个新的调强放疗计划。对于每个计划,比较了非编辑腺体的平均剂量与观察者编辑的相同腺体的剂量。
对于两名观察者,编辑后的颈部 CTV 大于 ABAS 自动轮廓(p≤0.04),平均增加 8.7%。当评估编辑结构集上的 ABAS 计划时,V(95)减少了 7.2%±5.4%(1 SD)(p<0.03)。D(99)的平均减少量为 14.2 Gy(范围 1-54 Gy)。即使 Dice 系数>0.8 和平均轮廓距离<1mm,也观察到高达 11Gy 的 D(99)减少。对于基于观察者 PTV 和非编辑自动轮廓唾液腺的治疗计划,编辑腺体的平均剂量仅相差-0.6 Gy±1.0 Gy(p=0.06)。
需要编辑 ABAS 生成的自动轮廓颈部 CTV,以避免靶体积中出现大剂量不足。用于评估自动轮廓算法的常用相似性度量,如 Dice 系数,不能很好地预测 PTV 的预期剂量不足。编辑唾液腺并不重要,因为非编辑腺体的平均剂量很好地预测了编辑结构。