[《亚健康测评量表1.0版的信效度评定》]
[Assessment of the reliability and validity of the Sub-health Measurement Scale Version1.0].
作者信息
Xu Jun, Feng Li-yi, Luo Ren, Qiu Jin-cai, Zhang Jin-hua, Zhao Xiao-shan, Lu Yan, Wei Qian
机构信息
Department of Economic Management, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China.
出版信息
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2011 Jan;31(1):33-8.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the reliability and validity of the Sub-health Measurement Scale Version 1.0 (SHMS V1.0).
METHODS
A spot trial sampling of 2000 individuals was conducted to study the test-retest reliability, Cronbach alpha coefficient, split-half reliability, contract validity, content validity and criterion-related validity of SHMS V1.0.
RESULTS
The spot trial results indicated a test-retest reliability of SHMS V1.0 of 0.644 (P<0.001) with a Cronbach α coefficient of 0.917 and a split-half reliability of 0.831. The results showed a close correlation between each item of SHMS V1.0 and its dimension, but a low correlation between a particular item and other dimensions. The dimension score was significantly correlated to its subscale scores, but not to other subscale scores. The results of factor analysis matched the theoretical conception of SHMS V1.0. The correlation coefficient between SHMS V1.0 and SF-36 was 0.664 (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION
SHMS V1.0 has a good reliability and validity, and is a reliable and valid measurement scale for sub-health evaluation.
目的
评估亚健康测评量表1.0版（SHMS V1.0）的信度和效度。
方法
对2000名个体进行现场试验抽样，以研究SHMS V1.0的重测信度、克朗巴哈α系数、分半信度、结构效度、内容效度和效标关联效度。
结果
现场试验结果表明，SHMS V1.0的重测信度为0.644（P<0.001），克朗巴哈α系数为0.917，分半信度为0.831。结果显示，SHMS V1.0的各条目与其维度之间存在密切相关性，但特定条目与其他维度之间的相关性较低。维度得分与其子量表得分显著相关，但与其他子量表得分无关。因子分析结果与SHMS V1.0的理论构想相符。SHMS V1.0与SF-36的相关系数为0.664（P<0.001）。
结论
SHMS V1.0具有良好的信度和效度，是一种可靠、有效的亚健康评估量表。
Zotero 插件