Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Epidemiology, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Chieti, Italy.
Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):347-52. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1709.
The QUASAR (Quality Assessment Score and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Italian Diabetes Patients) study aimed to assess whether a quality-of-care summary score predicted the development of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with type 2 diabetes.
In 67 diabetes clinics, data on randomly selected patients were extracted from electronic medical records. The score was calculated using process and outcome indicators based on monitoring, targets, and treatment of A1C, blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, and microalbuminuria. The score ranged from 0 to 40.
Overall, 5,181 patients were analyzed; 477 (9.2%) patients developed a CV event after a median follow-up of 28 months. The incidence rate (per 1,000 person-years) of CV events was 62.4 in patients with a score of <15, 41.0 in those with a score between 20 and 25 and 36.7 in those with a score of >25. Multilevel analysis, adjusted for clustering and case-mix, showed that the risk to develop a new CV event was 84% higher in patients with a score of <15 (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.62) and 17% higher in those with a score between 15 and 25 (IRR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.93-1.49) compared with those with a score of >25. Mean quality score varied across centers from 16.5 ± 7.5 to 29.1 ± 6.3. When the score was tested as the dependent variable, it emerged that 18% of the variance in the score could be attributed to setting characteristics.
Our study documented a close relationship between quality of diabetes care and long-term outcomes. A simple score can be used to monitor quality of care and compare the performance of different centers/physicians.
QUASAR(意大利糖尿病患者的质量评估评分和心血管结局)研究旨在评估护理质量综合评分是否可以预测 2 型糖尿病患者发生心血管(CV)事件。
在 67 家糖尿病诊所中,从电子病历中提取了随机选择的患者的数据。该评分使用基于监测、目标和治疗 A1C、血压、LDL 胆固醇和微量白蛋白尿的过程和结果指标计算得出。评分范围为 0 至 40。
总体而言,对 5181 名患者进行了分析;在中位数为 28 个月的随访后,有 477(9.2%)名患者发生 CV 事件。CV 事件的发生率(每 1000 人年)在评分<15 的患者中为 62.4,在评分在 20 至 25 之间的患者中为 41.0,在评分>25 的患者中为 36.7。多水平分析,调整聚类和病例组合后,评分<15 的患者发生新的 CV 事件的风险增加 84%(发病率比[IRR] = 1.84;95%置信区间[CI] 1.29-2.62),评分在 15 至 25 之间的患者增加 17%(IRR = 1.17;95%CI 0.93-1.49)。平均质量评分在各中心之间的差异为 16.5±7.5 至 29.1±6.3。当将评分作为因变量进行测试时,评分的 18%可归因于设置特征。
我们的研究记录了糖尿病护理质量与长期结局之间的密切关系。一个简单的评分可以用于监测护理质量并比较不同中心/医生的表现。