Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7070, USA.
Laryngoscope. 2011 Feb;121(2):352-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.21278. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To correlate imaging and audiologic findings in patients with large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS).
Retrospective analysis.
Thirty-eight patients with LVAS evident on magnetic resonance imaging with available clinical and audiometric data were selected from the databases of the study institution. Images were analyzed for endolymphatic sac and duct size, evidence of incomplete cochlear partitioning, and endolymphatic sac signal heterogeneity. The endolymphatic duct was measured in two different locations: near the vestibular aperture (ED(VA)) and at the midpoint between the common crus and the operculum (ED(MID)). Imaging data were correlated with audiologic variables.
There was significant correlation between ears for the audiologic and anatomic variables collected. Twenty-one (62%) patients had a fluctuating or progressive hearing loss, and 13 (38%) remained stable (four were not evaluable). At the time of the analysis, 41% of ears had a profound loss. Significant correlation was identified between the presence of endolymphatic signal heterogeneity and worse pure tone average (PTA). ED(VA) measures were significantly larger among ears with a progressive pattern of hearing loss when compared to those that were stable. Also, ED(VA) correlated with PTA and the presence of progressive hearing loss, but ED(MID) had no such a relationship.
Evidence of endolymphatic sac signal heterogeneity and larger measures of endolymphatic width when measured near the vestibule (ED(VA)) are markers of poorer hearing in these patients. By contrast, midpoint measures of the endolymphatic duct (ED(MID)) have no correlation with audiometric parameters.
目的/假设:分析大前庭水管综合征(LVAS)患者的影像学和听力学表现。
回顾性分析。
从研究机构的数据库中选择 38 例经磁共振成像(MRI)证实存在 LVAS 且具有临床和听力学数据的患者。分析图像以评估内淋巴管囊和导管大小、不完全耳蜗分隔的证据以及内淋巴管囊信号异质性。在内耳导水管的两个不同位置(靠近前庭口的位置 [ED(VA)] 和总脚与镫骨板之间的中点 [ED(MID)])测量内淋巴管导水管。将影像学数据与听力学变量相关联。
所收集的听力学和解剖学变量在左右耳之间具有显著相关性。21 例(62%)患者有波动性或进行性听力损失,13 例(38%)听力稳定(4 例无法评估)。在分析时,41%的耳朵有严重的听力损失。内淋巴管信号异质性的存在与纯音听阈平均值(PTA)更差之间存在显著相关性。与听力稳定的耳朵相比,进行性听力损失的耳朵的 ED(VA)测量值明显更大。此外,ED(VA)与 PTA 和进行性听力损失相关,但 ED(MID)没有这种关系。
内淋巴管囊信号异质性的存在和靠近前庭时测量的更大的内淋巴管宽度(ED(VA))是这些患者听力较差的标志物。相比之下,内淋巴管导水管的中点测量值(ED(MID))与听力参数没有相关性。