• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子重置对左心室起搏和膈神经刺激的影响。

The effect of electronic repositioning on left ventricular pacing and phrenic nerve stimulation.

机构信息

Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec, 2725 Chemin Sainte-Foy Québec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Europace. 2011 Mar;13(3):409-15. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq499. Epub 2011 Jan 26.

DOI:10.1093/europace/euq499
PMID:21273196
Abstract

AIMS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves survival and reduces heart failure symptoms. However, phrenic nerve stimulation and high pacing thresholds are common problems that limit CRT effectiveness. Current technology allows reprogramming of left ventricular (LV) pacing vectors, permitting 'electronic repositioning' to overcome both phrenic nerve stimulation and high pacing output without the need for re-operation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients underwent prospective evaluation of a CRT system implantation with a bipolar LV. Optimal LV threshold and avoidance of phrenic nerve stimulation were determined at baseline and at 6 months. A subset of 48 patients underwent more detailed evaluation of pacing threshold and phrenic nerve stimulation at baseline and at 6 months. Between 2004 and 2007, 228 patients underwent CRT implantation (64 CRT pacemakers, 164 CRT defibrillators). At baseline, electronic reprogramming to determine an alternate configuration compared with standard LVtip to LVring found a ≥ 1.0 V reduction in pacing threshold in 80 patients (35%). Of the 17 patients who had an LVtip to LVring configuration and high pacing threshold (>5.0 V), 16 could be reduced by >1.0 V (94%) and 11 could be reduced by >2.0 V through electronic repositioning alone without repositioning the lead (65%). At implant, there were 48 patients with phrenic nerve stimulation at less than maximum pacing output (21%) using the standard LVtip to LVring configuration. In 37 cases (77%), there was at least one other configuration with no phrenic nerve stimulation, which prevented the need for lead revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Electronic repositioning is an important tool in the management of CRT patients which may help to lower thresholds, avoid phrenic nerve stimulation, and prevent unnecessary re-operations for LV lead repositioning.

摘要

目的

心脏再同步治疗(CRT)可改善生存率并减轻心力衰竭症状。然而,膈神经刺激和高起搏阈值是常见问题,限制了 CRT 的疗效。目前的技术允许重新编程左心室(LV)起搏向量,实现“电子重新定位”,在无需再次手术的情况下克服膈神经刺激和高起搏输出。

方法和结果

患者前瞻性评估了具有双极 LV 的 CRT 系统植入术。在基线和 6 个月时确定 LV 阈值最佳且避免膈神经刺激。48 例患者的起搏阈值和膈神经刺激在基线和 6 个月时进行了更详细的评估。在 2004 年至 2007 年间,228 例患者接受了 CRT 植入术(64 例 CRT 起搏器,164 例 CRT 除颤器)。在基线时,与标准 LVtip 至 LVring 相比,电子重新编程以确定替代配置发现 80 例患者(35%)的起搏阈值降低了≥1.0V。在 17 例具有 LVtip 至 LVring 配置且高起搏阈值(>5.0V)的患者中,16 例可通过电子重新定位降低>1.0V(94%),11 例可通过电子重新定位降低>2.0V(65%),无需重新定位导联。在植入时,有 48 例患者使用标准 LVtip 至 LVring 配置时在最大起搏输出以下出现膈神经刺激(21%)。在 37 例(77%)中,至少有一种其他配置无膈神经刺激,从而避免了导联修订的需要。

结论

电子重新定位是 CRT 患者管理的重要工具,可帮助降低阈值、避免膈神经刺激,并防止因 LV 导联重新定位而进行不必要的再次手术。

相似文献

1
The effect of electronic repositioning on left ventricular pacing and phrenic nerve stimulation.电子重置对左心室起搏和膈神经刺激的影响。
Europace. 2011 Mar;13(3):409-15. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq499. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
2
Clinical efficacy of left ventricular pacing vector programmability in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator patients for management of phrenic nerve stimulation and/or elevated left ventricular pacing thresholds: insights from the Efface Phrenic Stim study.左心室起搏向量程控在心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者管理膈神经刺激和/或升高的左心室起搏阈值中的临床疗效:来自 Efface Phrenic Stim 研究的见解。
Europace. 2012 Jun;14(6):826-32. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur412. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
3
Phrenic nerve stimulation with the quadripolar left ventricular lead not overcome by 'electronic repositioning'.膈神经刺激不能被“电子重定位”克服,使用四极左侧心室导联。
Europace. 2012 Apr;14(4):608-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur355. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
4
Left ventricular lead implantation at a phrenic stimulation site is safe and effective.左心室导线植入于膈神经刺激部位是安全且有效的。
Europace. 2011 Apr;13(4):520-5. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq505. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
5
Long pacing pulses reduce phrenic nerve stimulation in left ventricular pacing.长时程起搏脉冲可降低左心室起搏时膈神经的刺激。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 May;25(5):485-490. doi: 10.1111/jce.12345. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
6
Upgrading to resynchronization therapy after chronic right ventricular pacing improves left ventricular remodelling.升级为慢性右心室起搏后的再同步治疗可改善左心室重构。
Eur Heart J. 2010 Jun;31(12):1477-85. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq065. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
7
Insulation of the phrenic nerve as an alternative to left ventricular lead repositioning in cardiac resynchronization therapy.在心脏再同步治疗中,膈神经绝缘作为左心室导线重新定位的替代方法。
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Mar 3;147(2):328-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.12.087. Epub 2011 Jan 22.
8
Phrenic stimulation management in CRT patients: are we there yet?膈肌刺激管理在 CRT 患者中的应用:我们做到了吗?
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011 Jan;26(1):12-6. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3283413838.
9
Programmable multiple pacing configurations help to overcome high left ventricular pacing thresholds and avoid phrenic nerve stimulation.可编程的多种起搏配置有助于克服高左心室起搏阈值并避免膈神经刺激。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Dec;28(12):1255-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00265.x.
10
Postoperative performance of the Quartet® left ventricular heart lead. Quartet® 左心室心脏导线的术后表现。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):449-56. doi: 10.1111/jce.12065. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
New Diseases Related to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): An Overview.与心脏植入式电子设备(CIEDs)相关的新疾病:概述
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 17;14(4):1322. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041322.
2
Multipolar pacing by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillators treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus failing heart patients: impact on responders rate, and clinical outcomes.心脏再同步治疗联合除颤器对2型糖尿病心力衰竭患者进行多极起搏:对反应率和临床结局的影响
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Jun 9;16(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0554-2.
3
A Meta-Analysis Of Quadripolar Versus Bipolar Left Ventricular Leads On Post-Procedural Outcomes.
四极与双极左心室导线对术后结局影响的Meta分析
J Atr Fibrillation. 2016 Aug 31;9(2):1472. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1472. eCollection 2016 Aug-Sep.
4
An Overview of Current Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.当前心脏再同步治疗概述
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2013 Nov;29(6):496-504.
5
Preventing phrenic nerve stimulation by a patch insulation in an intact swine heart model.在完整猪心脏模型中通过贴片绝缘预防膈神经刺激。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 17;9(7):e102608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102608. eCollection 2014.
6
Phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.心脏再同步治疗中的膈神经刺激
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Oct;41(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9917-8. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
7
Phrenic nerve stimulation in CRT patients and benefits of electronic lead repositioning: the ERACE trial.心脏再同步治疗(CRT)患者的膈神经刺激及电子导线重新定位的益处:ERACE试验
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013 Oct;38(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10840-013-9811-9. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
8
Comparison of different pacing strategies to minimize phrenic nerve stimulation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.比较不同的起搏策略以最小化心脏再同步治疗中的膈神经刺激。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Sep;24(9):1008-14. doi: 10.1111/jce.12159. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
9
Disparity in left ventricular stimulation among different pacing configurations in cardiac resynchronization therapy.不同心脏再同步治疗起搏模式左心室刺激的差异。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Feb;5(1):140-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.965475. Epub 2011 Dec 22.