Suppr超能文献

大容量培养法与其他从透析液中分离微生物方法的比较。

Comparison of large volume culture to other methods for isolation of microorganisms from dialysate.

作者信息

Sewell D L, Golper T A, Hulman P B, Thomas C M, West L M, Kubey W Y, Holmes C J

机构信息

Laboratory Service (113 P), Veterans Administration Medical Center, Portland, OR 97207.

出版信息

Perit Dial Int. 1990;10(1):49-52.

PMID:2128189
Abstract

Patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) who reside long distances from a CAPD center often use community medical laboratories to document and manage episodes of peritonitis. We examined the feasibility of using large volume cultures as an alternative to more costly and labor intensive methods and to enhance earlier recovery of microorganisms from these patients. Three methods of processing dialysate from patients on CAPD were compared: (a) inoculation of 400 mL dialysate into a transfer bag (Baxter Healthcare, Inc., Round Lake, IL) containing 100 mL of 5-fold concentrate of trypticase-soy broth: (b) inoculation of 5 mL into each of two Bactec bottles (Johnston Laboratories, Towson, MD): and (c) centrifugation of 50 mL and culture of the sediment without white cell lysis on plated media and two Bactec bottles. Of the 58 specimens cultured, 34 (59%) were positive by one or more methods. Antimicrobial activity was detected in 20/58 (34%) dialysates, which represent 54% of all no-growth cultures. Of the 34 culture-positive specimens, microorganisms were recovered on plated media in 22 (65%); by the centrifugation system in 32 (94%); by the routine Bactec system in 28 (82%); and by large volume culture in 30 (88%). The large volume culture system is an acceptable alternative to the more costly Bactec System and the labor intensive centrifugation method but does not significantly improve recovery of microorganisms.

摘要

居住在远离持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)中心的CAPD患者,常利用社区医学实验室来记录和处理腹膜炎发作情况。我们研究了使用大容量培养法作为更昂贵且劳动强度大的方法的替代方法的可行性,以提高从这些患者中更早地分离出微生物。比较了三种处理CAPD患者透析液的方法:(a)将400 mL透析液接种到装有100 mL 5倍浓缩胰蛋白酶大豆肉汤的转移袋(百特医疗保健公司,伊利诺伊州圆湖)中;(b)将5 mL接种到两个Bactec瓶(约翰斯顿实验室,马里兰州陶森)中;(c)将50 mL透析液离心,对沉淀物进行培养,不进行白细胞裂解,接种到平板培养基和两个Bactec瓶中。在培养的58份标本中,34份(59%)通过一种或多种方法检测为阳性。在20/58(34%)的透析液中检测到抗菌活性,这些透析液占所有无生长培养物的54%。在34份培养阳性标本中,平板培养基上分离出微生物的有22份(65%);离心系统分离出的有32份(94%);常规Bactec系统分离出的有28份(82%);大容量培养法分离出的有30份(88%)。大容量培养系统是比更昂贵的Bactec系统和劳动强度大的离心法更可接受的替代方法,但并不能显著提高微生物的分离率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验