Suppr超能文献

共享决策指导提醒工具(SDM-GRIP)。

Shared Decision Making Guidance Reminders in Practice (SDM-GRIP).

机构信息

Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, C203 East Fee, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI 48824-1316, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.028. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Develop a system of practice tools and procedures to prompt shared decision making in primary care. SDM-GRIP (Shared Decision Making Guidance Reminders in Practice) was developed for suspected stable coronary artery disease (CAD), prior to the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) decision.

METHODS

Program evaluation of SDM-GRIP components: Grand Rounds, provider training (communication skills and clinical evidence), decision aid (DA), patient group visit, encounter decision guide (EDG), SDM provider visit.

RESULTS

Participation-Physician training=73% (21/29); patient group visits=25% of patients with diagnosis of CAD contacted (43/168). SDM visits=16% (27/168). Among SDM visit pairs, 82% of responding providers reported using the EDG in SDM encounters. Patients valued the SDM-GRIP program, and wanted to discuss comparative effectiveness information with a cardiologist. SDM visits were routinely reimbursed.

CONCLUSION

Program elements were well received and logistically feasible. However, recruitment to an extra educational group visit was low. Future implementation will move SDM-GRIP to the point of routine ordering of non-emergent stress tests to retain pre-decision timing of PCI and to improve coordination of care, with SDM tools available across primary care and cardiology.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Guidance prompts and provider training appear feasible. Implementation at stress testing requires further investigation.

摘要

目的

开发一套实践工具和程序系统,以促进初级保健中的共同决策。SDM-GRIP(实践中共同决策指导提醒)是在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)决策之前,为疑似稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)开发的。

方法

对 SDM-GRIP 组件进行方案评估:大查房、医生培训(沟通技巧和临床证据)、决策辅助(DA)、患者小组访视、就诊决策指南(EDG)、SDM 医生访视。

结果

参与-医生培训=73%(21/29);患者小组访视=联系诊断为 CAD 的患者的 25%(43/168)。SDM 访视=16%(27/168)。在 SDM 访视对中,82%的回复提供者报告在 SDM 就诊中使用了 EDG。患者对 SDM-GRIP 计划很满意,并希望与心脏病专家讨论比较效果信息。SDM 访视通常可获得报销。

结论

项目要素受到欢迎且在操作上可行。然而,招募参加额外的教育性小组访视的人数较少。未来的实施将使 SDM-GRIP 常规用于非紧急应激测试,以保留 PCI 的决策前时间,并改善护理协调,在初级保健和心脏病学中提供 SDM 工具。

实践意义

指导提示和提供者培训似乎可行。在应激测试中的实施需要进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验