Department of PH&PC, Academic Center for General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 7 block h, box 7001, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 29;24(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05557-1.
Shared decision making (SDM) has been presented as the preferred approach for decisions where there is more than one acceptable option and has been identified a priority feature of high-quality patient-centered care. Considering the foundation of trust between general practitioners (GPs) and patients and the variety of diseases in primary care, the primary care context can be viewed as roots of SDM. GPs are requesting training programs to improve their SDM skills leading to a more patient-centered care approach. Because of the high number of training programs available, it is important to overview these training interventions specifically for primary care and to explore how these training programs are evaluated.
This review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. Eight different databases were used in December 2022 and updated in September 2023. Risk of bias was assessed using ICROMS. Training effectiveness was analyzed using the Kirkpatrick evaluation model and categorized according to training format (online, live or blended learning).
We identified 29 different SDM training programs for GPs. SDM training has a moderate impact on patient (SMD 0.53 95% CI 0.15-0.90) and observer reported SDM skills (SMD 0.59 95%CI 0.21-0.97). For blended training programs, we found a high impact for quality of life (SMD 1.20 95% CI -0.38-2.78) and patient reported SDM skills (SMD 2.89 95%CI -0.55-6.32).
SDM training improves patient and observer reported SDM skills in GPs. Blended learning as learning format for SDM appears to show better effects on learning outcomes than online or live learning formats. This suggests that teaching facilities designing SDM training may want to prioritize blended learning formats. More homogeneity in SDM measurement scales and evaluation approaches and direct comparisons of different types of educational formats are needed to develop the most appropriate and effective SDM training format.
PROSPERO: A systematic review of shared-decision making training programs in a primary care setting. PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023393385 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023393385 .
共享决策制定(SDM)已被提出作为存在多种可接受选择的决策的首选方法,并被确定为以患者为中心的高质量护理的优先特征。考虑到全科医生(GP)和患者之间的信任基础以及初级保健中的各种疾病,初级保健环境可以被视为 SDM 的根源。GP 们要求开展培训计划来提高他们的 SDM 技能,从而采用更以患者为中心的护理方法。由于现有的培训计划数量众多,因此有必要专门概述这些针对初级保健的培训干预措施,并探讨这些培训计划是如何进行评估的。
本综述按照 PRISMA 指南进行报告。2022 年 12 月使用了 8 个不同的数据库,并于 2023 年 9 月进行了更新。使用 ICROMS 评估偏倚风险。使用柯克帕特里克评估模型分析培训效果,并根据培训形式(在线、现场或混合学习)进行分类。
我们确定了 29 项针对 GP 的不同 SDM 培训计划。SDM 培训对患者(SMD 0.53,95%CI 0.15-0.90)和观察者报告的 SDM 技能(SMD 0.59,95%CI 0.21-0.97)具有中等影响。对于混合培训计划,我们发现生活质量(SMD 1.20,95%CI -0.38-2.78)和患者报告的 SDM 技能(SMD 2.89,95%CI -0.55-6.32)有较高的影响。
SDM 培训可提高 GP 中患者和观察者报告的 SDM 技能。作为 SDM 的学习形式,混合学习比在线或现场学习形式显示出更好的学习效果。这表明,设计 SDM 培训的教学机构可能希望优先考虑混合学习形式。为了开发最合适和最有效的 SDM 培训形式,需要在 SDM 测量量表和评估方法方面实现更高的同质性,并对不同类型的教育形式进行直接比较。
PROSPERO:初级保健环境中共享决策制定培训计划的系统评价。PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023393385 可从以下网址获得:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023393385。