School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Eur Addict Res. 2011;17(2):106-12. doi: 10.1159/000323278. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
This study reports on the relative gravity people attribute to various addictive behaviors with respect to other societal concerns in four northern populations with different history, social policy and treatment alternatives for addicted individuals.
Random population surveys were conducted in Canada, Sweden, Finland and St. Petersburg, Russia. In Finland and Sweden, the survey was conducted by mail, in Canada and St. Petersburg by phone. As a part of this survey, the respondents were asked to assess the gravity of various societal problems, some of which involved various addictive behaviors. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistical methods, factor analysis, contextual analysis and multiple regression analysis.
Hard drugs, criminality and environmental issues belonged to the topmost problems in all data samples. Overall, Finns and Canadians appeared the least worried about various societal problems, Swedes seemed the most worried and St. Petersburgian views were the most polarized. Two factors were extracted from the combined data. Factor 1 covered criminal behavior and various addictions; it was named Threats to Safety factor. Factor 2 comprised social equality issues. The country context explained 12.5% of the variance of the safety factor and 7.9% of the equality factor.
Despite some cultural variation in the gravity assessments, the central core of the social representation of addictive behaviors tends still to be linked with 'badness' since they were mainly grouped with various forms of criminal behavior in all these countries.
本研究报告了在四个具有不同历史、社会政策和成瘾者治疗选择的北方人群中,人们相对于其他社会关注因素,对各种成瘾行为的相对重视程度。
在加拿大、瑞典、芬兰和俄罗斯圣彼得堡进行了随机人口调查。在芬兰和瑞典,调查是通过邮件进行的,在加拿大和圣彼得堡是通过电话进行的。作为这项调查的一部分,要求受访者评估各种社会问题的严重性,其中一些问题涉及各种成瘾行为。数据采用描述性统计方法、因子分析、情境分析和多元回归分析进行分析。
在所有数据样本中,硬毒品、犯罪和环境问题都属于最严重的问题。总体而言,芬兰人和加拿大人似乎对各种社会问题的担忧最小,瑞典人似乎最担心,而圣彼得堡人的观点则最为两极化。从综合数据中提取了两个因素。第一个因素涵盖了犯罪行为和各种成瘾行为,被命名为“安全威胁”因素。第二个因素包括社会平等问题。国家背景解释了安全因素 12.5%的方差和平等因素 7.9%的方差。
尽管在严重性评估方面存在一些文化差异,但成瘾行为的社会代表性的核心仍然倾向于与“不良”联系在一起,因为在所有这些国家中,它们主要与各种形式的犯罪行为一起分组。