Suppr超能文献

三联抗栓治疗而非三联威胁:长期口服抗凝治疗患者支架植入术后两种抗栓方案的荟萃分析。

"Triple therapy" rather than "triple threat": a meta-analysis of the two antithrombotic regimens after stent implantation in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulant treatment.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education and Chinese Ministry of Public Health; and the Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Ji'nan, Republic of China.

Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education and Chinese Ministry of Public Health; and the Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Ji'nan, Republic of China.

出版信息

Chest. 2011 Feb;139(2):260-270. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-3083.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of patients with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation (PCI-s). However, the optimal antithrombotic treatment for these patients is currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to characterize the benefits and risks of triple antithrombotic therapy (combined aspirin, clopidogrel, and OAC) after stent implantation in patients under long-term OAC treatment compared with dual antiplatelet therapy (combined aspirin and clopidogrel).

METHODS

The study consisted of clinical controlled trials with ≥ 3 months of follow-up that compared triple antithrombotic therapy with dual antiplatelet therapy after stent implantation in patients undergoing long-term OAC treatment.

RESULTS

Nine clinical trials included 1,996 participants. The meta-analysis was feasible because the grouping criterion was similar. The meta-analysis of the prevention of a major adverse cardiovascular event shows triple antithrombotic therapy to be more efficacious than dual antiplatelet therapy (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42-0.86; P = .005). There was a significant reduction in all-cause mortality with triple antithrombotic therapy compared with dual antiplatelet therapy. The meta-analysis of major bleeding in the first 6 months during follow-up shows significantly more events with triple antithrombotic therapy (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.05-4.29; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our analysis, triple antithrombotic therapy is substantially more efficacious in reducing the occurrence of cardiovascular events and mortality in PCI-s patients with an indication for long-term OAC, compared with dual antiplatelet therapy. Although triple therapy predisposes patients to an increased risk of bleeding, especially major bleeding, it is the better choice for patients with a low bleeding risk.

摘要

背景

越来越多有长期口服抗凝治疗(OAC)适应证的患者接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI-s)和支架植入术。然而,目前尚不清楚这些患者的最佳抗血栓治疗方法。本研究旨在比较长期 OAC 治疗患者支架植入术后三联抗栓治疗(联合阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和 OAC)与双联抗血小板治疗(联合阿司匹林和氯吡格雷)的获益和风险。

方法

该研究包括了至少随访 3 个月的临床对照试验,比较了长期 OAC 治疗患者支架植入术后三联抗栓治疗与双联抗血小板治疗。

结果

9 项临床试验共纳入 1996 名参与者。由于分组标准相似,因此可以进行荟萃分析。预防主要不良心血管事件的荟萃分析表明,三联抗栓治疗比双联抗血小板治疗更有效(OR,0.60;95%CI,0.42-0.86;P =.005)。三联抗栓治疗组的全因死亡率显著低于双联抗血小板治疗组。随访 6 个月内主要出血的荟萃分析表明,三联抗栓治疗组的事件发生率显著更高(OR,2.12;95%CI,1.05-4.29;P =.04)。

结论

基于我们的分析,与双联抗血小板治疗相比,三联抗栓治疗可显著降低长期 OAC 适应证 PCI-s 患者心血管事件和死亡率的发生。尽管三联治疗使患者出血风险,尤其是大出血风险增加,但对于出血风险低的患者,它是更好的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验