University College London, WCIE 6BT, London, England.
Mem Cognit. 1976 Nov;4(6):753-8. doi: 10.3758/BF03213244.
Two experiments examined whether phonological receding is an obligatory stage in reading for meaning or whether direct access to a word's semantic representation is the general rule. The first study demonstrated that the time to make a semantic decision about a pair of words was much more delayed by misspelling than was the time to make a phonological one. The second study investigated the effect of varying the syllabic length of a word on reaction time in a category decision task. While reaction time varied with the semantic difficulty of the category decision, it generally proved invariant with respect to syllabic length. It is argued that reading for meaning generally uses a direct route from visual form to semantic representation.
两项实验检验了语音回溯是否是阅读意义的必经阶段,或者是否直接访问单词的语义表示是一般规则。第一项研究表明,拼写错误会极大地延迟对一对单词进行语义判断的时间,而不是语音判断的时间。第二项研究调查了在类别决策任务中改变单词音节长度对反应时间的影响。虽然反应时间随类别决策的语义难度而变化,但它通常与音节长度无关。有人认为,阅读意义通常使用从视觉形式到语义表示的直接途径。