• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

育儿信心量表综述。

Review of scales of parenting confidence.

作者信息

Crncec Rudi, Barnett Bryanne, Matthey Stephen

机构信息

University of Western Sydney, Sydney South West Area Health Service, Australia.

出版信息

J Nurs Meas. 2010;18(3):210-40. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.18.3.210.

DOI:10.1891/1061-3749.18.3.210
PMID:21290926
Abstract

Interest in the measurement of parenting confidence in research and clinical contexts has grown considerably in recent decades, particularly in the area of health care. Psychometric and technical characteristics of scales assessing this construct suitable for the parents of children aged 0-12 years were reviewed in this research. In so doing, information is provided that will assist clinicians and researchers in selecting a measure suitable to their needs. Thirty-six instruments assessing parenting confidence were located. Two dominant approaches to item selection were evident: (1) general items suitable for a range of child ages, or (2) task-specific items suitable for parents of a child of a particular age. Psychometrically, most scales possessed adequate reliability data, although validity data for many scales was limited. In addition, only two of the instruments, both with general items, had stratified normative data. Scales appropriate for a range of research purposes and some clinical applications are available. Further research is necessary to provide normative data for task-specific parenting confidence scales.

摘要

近几十年来,无论是在研究还是临床环境中,对育儿信心测量的关注度都有了显著增长,尤其是在医疗保健领域。本研究回顾了适用于0至12岁儿童父母的、评估这一概念的量表的心理测量和技术特征。这样做能够提供相关信息,帮助临床医生和研究人员选择适合他们需求的测量方法。共找到36种评估育儿信心的工具。项目选择有两种主要方法:(1)适用于不同年龄段儿童的通用项目,或(2)适用于特定年龄段儿童父母的特定任务项目。从心理测量角度来看,大多数量表都有足够的可靠性数据,不过许多量表的有效性数据有限。此外,只有两个工具(均为通用项目)有分层的常模数据。有适用于一系列研究目的和一些临床应用的量表。有必要进行进一步研究,为特定任务的育儿信心量表提供常模数据。

相似文献

1
Review of scales of parenting confidence.育儿信心量表综述。
J Nurs Meas. 2010;18(3):210-40. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.18.3.210.
2
Assessing health system provision of well-child care: The Promoting Healthy Development Survey.评估卫生系统提供的儿童健康保健服务:促进健康发展调查
Pediatrics. 2001 May;107(5):1084-94. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.5.1084.
3
Psychometric assessment of scales for a Model of Goal Directed Vegetable Parenting Practices (MGDVPP).量表的心理计量学评估——目标导向型蔬菜养育实践模型(MGDVPP)
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Sep 22;10:110. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-110.
4
Child behaviour problems and childhood illness: development of the Eczema Behaviour Checklist.儿童行为问题与儿童期疾病:湿疹行为检查表的编制
Child Care Health Dev. 2017 Jan;43(1):67-74. doi: 10.1111/cch.12412. Epub 2016 Oct 2.
5
Child Adjustment and Parent Efficacy Scale-Developmental Disability (CAPES-DD): First psychometric evaluation of a new child and parenting assessment tool for children with a developmental disability.儿童适应与家长效能感量表-发育障碍版(CAPES-DD):一种针对发育障碍儿童的新型儿童及家长评估工具的首次心理测量学评估。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Jun-Jul;53-54:158-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.09.006. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
6
Development of an item bank for food parenting practices based on published instruments and reports from Canadian and US parents.基于已发表的工具以及加拿大和美国父母的报告,开发一个关于食物养育方式的题库。
Appetite. 2016 Aug 1;103:386-395. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.04.033. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
7
Psychometric qualities of the Short Form of the Self-efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index-Toddler Scale.育儿任务自我效能感指数幼儿量表简版的心理测量学特性。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2014 Aug;45(4):443-55. doi: 10.1007/s10578-013-0414-6.
8
Positive parenting by parents of children up to three years of age: development and validation of measurement scales.三岁以下儿童家长的积极育儿方式:测量量表的编制与验证
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2012 Jul-Aug;20(4):787-95. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692012000400020.
9
The physical activity parenting practices (PAPP) item Bank: a psychometrically validated tool for improving the measurement of physical activity parenting practices of parents of 5-12-year-old children.体力活动养育实践(PAPP)项目库:一种经过心理测量验证的工具,用于改进对 5-12 岁儿童家长体力活动养育实践的测量。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 4;17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01036-0.
10
[Parenthood and parenting stress: psychometric testing of the Parenting Stress Index (PSI) in a German sample].[为人父母与育儿压力:德国样本中育儿压力指数(PSI)的心理测量测试]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2009 Jun;59(6):224-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1067436. Epub 2008 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the Relationships Between Parenting Practices, Children's Temperament, and Academic and Behavioural Outcomes in Lower-Income Families.探究低收入家庭中养育方式、儿童气质与学业及行为结果之间的关系。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 6;15(6):786. doi: 10.3390/bs15060786.
2
Examining cross-sectional associations between Australian parents' physical activity levels and their parenting confidence.研究澳大利亚父母的身体活动水平与其育儿信心之间的横断面关联。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 7;25(1):1686. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22833-x.
3
The Unique Impacts of COVID-19 on Low-Income and Diverse Canadian Women's Mental Health Profiles: A Latent Transition Analysis.
《COVID-19 对加拿大低收入和多元化女性心理健康状况的独特影响:潜在转变分析》。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Nov;28(11):1974-1989. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-03992-6. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
4
Validation of Parenting Your Baby and Parenting Your Toddler and Associations with Engagement in Parenting Intervention.《育儿宝典:婴儿篇》和《育儿宝典:幼儿篇》的验证以及与参与育儿干预的关联
J Child Fam Stud. 2023 Jun;32(6):1789-1804. doi: 10.1007/s10826-022-02484-x. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
5
Parenting self-efficacy instruments for parents of infants and toddlers: A review.针对婴幼儿父母的育儿自我效能感测量工具:一项综述。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2022 Jun 2;4:100082. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100082. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
I Know What to Do; I Can Do It; It Will Work: The Brief Parental Self Efficacy Scale (BPSES) for Parenting Interventions.我知道该怎么做;我能做到;这会有效:用于育儿干预的简短父母自我效能量表(BPSES)
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2025 Jun;56(3):619-628. doi: 10.1007/s10578-023-01583-0. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
7
The Italian version of the "tool to measure parental self-efficacy-short form": psychometric properties of the measure and initial validation.《父母自我效能感测量工具短式意大利语版》:该测量工具的心理测量学特性及初步验证。
Acta Biomed. 2023 Aug 3;94(4):e2023179. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i4.14470.
8
Holistic community-based group parenting programs for mothers with maternal mental health issues help address a growing public health need for a diversity of vulnerable mothers, children and families: Findings from an action research study.针对有孕产妇心理健康问题的母亲开展的基于社区的整体团体育儿项目,有助于满足日益增长的公共卫生需求,该需求涉及各类弱势母亲、儿童和家庭:一项行动研究的结果。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2023 Jan 17;3:1039527. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.1039527. eCollection 2022.
9
Randomized trial of promoting first relationships for new mothers who received community mental health services in pregnancy.随机试验,为在孕期接受社区心理健康服务的新妈妈推广首要关系。
Dev Psychol. 2021 Aug;57(8):1228-1241. doi: 10.1037/dev0001219.
10
HAPPY MAMA Project (PART 1). Assessing the Reliability of the Italian Karitane Parenting Confidence Scale (KPCS-IT) and Parental Stress Scale (PSS-IT): A Cross-Sectional Study among Mothers Who Gave Birth in the Last 12 Months.快乐妈妈项目(第一部分)。评估意大利 Karitane 育儿信心量表(KPCS-IT)和父母压力量表(PSS-IT)的信度:对过去 12 个月内分娩的母亲进行的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;18(8):4066. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084066.