Suppr超能文献

美国基于课程的生物医学和健康信息学项目比较。

A curricula-based comparison of biomedical and health informatics programs in the USA.

机构信息

School of Information and Library Science, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr;18(2):195-202. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004259. Epub 2011 Feb 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The field of Biomedical and Health Informatics (BMHI) continues to define itself, and there are many educational programs offering 'informatics' degrees with varied foci. The goal of this study was to develop a scheme for systematic comparison of programs across the entire BMHI spectrum and to identify commonalities among informatics curricula.

DESIGN

Guided by several published competency sets, a grounded theory approach was used to develop a program/curricula categorization scheme based on the descriptions of 636 courses offered by 73 public health, nursing, health, medical, and bioinformatics programs in the USA. The scheme was then used to compare the programs in the aforementioned five informatics disciplines.

RESULTS

The authors developed a Course-Based Informatics Program Categorization (CBIPC) scheme that can be used both to classify coursework for any BMHI educational program and to compare programs from the same or related disciplines. The application of CBIPC scheme to the analysis of public health, nursing, health, medical, and bioinformatics programs reveals distinct intradisciplinary curricular patterns and a common core of courses across the entire BMHI education domain. Limitations The study is based on descriptions of courses from the university's webpages. Thus, it is limited to sampling courses at one moment in time, and classification for the coding scheme is based primarily on course titles and course descriptions.

CONCLUSION

The CBIPC scheme combines empirical data about educational curricula from diverse informatics programs and several published competency sets. It also provides a foundation for discussion of BMHI education as a whole and can help define subdisciplinary competencies.

摘要

目的

生物医学和健康信息学(BMHI)领域继续自我定义,许多教育项目提供了具有不同重点的“信息学”学位。本研究的目的是制定一个系统比较整个 BMHI 范围内的项目的方案,并确定信息学课程之间的共同性。

设计

根据几个已发表的能力集,采用扎根理论方法,根据美国 73 个公共卫生、护理、健康、医学和生物信息学项目提供的 636 门课程的描述,开发了一个基于课程的信息学课程分类方案。然后,该方案用于比较上述五个信息学学科中的项目。

结果

作者开发了一个基于课程的信息学课程分类(CBIPC)方案,既可以用于对任何 BMHI 教育项目的课程进行分类,也可以用于比较来自同一或相关学科的项目。将 CBIPC 方案应用于公共卫生、护理、健康、医学和生物信息学项目的分析揭示了不同学科内课程的独特模式以及整个 BMHI 教育领域的共同核心课程。局限性:该研究基于大学网页上课程的描述。因此,它仅限于在一个时间点抽样课程,并且分类主要基于课程标题和课程描述。

结论

CBIPC 方案结合了来自不同信息学项目和几个已发表的能力集的关于教育课程的经验数据。它还为整个 BMHI 教育的讨论提供了基础,并有助于定义子学科能力。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Biomedical and health informatics teaching in Portugal: Current status.葡萄牙的生物医学与健康信息学教学:现状
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 14;9(3):e14163. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14163. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
An Approach for All in Pharmacy Informatics Education.药学信息学全人教育方法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Mar 25;81(2):38. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81238.
8
Trends in publication of nursing informatics research.护理信息学研究的出版趋势。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:805-14. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

4
What is biomedical informatics?生物医学信息学是什么?
J Biomed Inform. 2010 Feb;43(1):104-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
7
Core content for the subspecialty of clinical informatics.临床信息学亚专业的核心内容。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):153-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3045. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
8
A "fundamental theorem" of biomedical informatics.生物医学信息学的一个“基本定理”。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):169-70. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3092. Epub 2008 Dec 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验