Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Program in Bioethics and Humanities, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Chest. 2011 Apr;139(4):802-809. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1798. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
Decisions about CPR in the medical ICU (MICU) are important. However, discussions about CPR (code status discussions) can be challenging and may be incomplete if they do not address goals of care.
We interviewed 100 patients, or their surrogates, and their physicians in an MICU. We queried the patients/surrogates on their knowledge of CPR, code status preferences, and goals of care; we queried MICU physicians about goals of care and treatment plans. Medical records were reviewed for clinical information and code status orders.
Fifty patients/surrogates recalled discussing CPR preferences with a physician, and 51 recalled discussing goals of care. Eighty-three patients/surrogates preferred full code status, but only four could identify the three main components of in-hospital CPR (defibrillation, chest compressions, intubation). There were 16 discrepancies between code status preferences expressed during the interview and code status orders in the medical record. Respondents' average prediction of survival following in-hospital cardiac arrest with CPR was 71.8%, and the higher the prediction of survival, the greater the frequency of preference for full code status (P = .012). Of six possible goals of care, approximately five were affirmed by each patient/surrogate and physician, but 67.7% of patients/surrogates differed with their physicians about the most important goal of care.
Patients in the MICU and their surrogates have inadequate knowledge about in-hospital CPR and its likelihood of success, patients' code status preferences may not always be reflected in code status orders, and assessments may differ between patients/surrogates and physicians about what goal of care is most important.
在医疗 ICU(MICU)中,有关心肺复苏术(CPR)的决策非常重要。然而,如果这些讨论没有涉及到患者的医疗目标,那么心肺复苏术的讨论(即代码状态讨论)可能会具有挑战性,并且可能不完整。
我们在 MICU 中采访了 100 名患者或其代理人及其医生。我们询问了患者/代理人对 CPR 的了解、代码状态偏好以及医疗目标;我们询问了 MICU 医生有关医疗目标和治疗计划的问题。查阅病历以获取临床信息和代码状态医嘱。
50 名患者/代理人回忆与医生讨论过 CPR 偏好,而 51 名患者/代理人回忆讨论过医疗目标。83 名患者/代理人更喜欢完全的代码状态,但只有 4 名患者/代理人能够识别院内 CPR 的三个主要组成部分(除颤、胸部按压、插管)。在访谈中表达的代码状态偏好与病历中的代码状态医嘱之间存在 16 个差异。受访者对院内心脏骤停后 CPR 存活的平均预测为 71.8%,预测存活率越高,对完全代码状态的偏好频率越高(P=0.012)。在六个可能的医疗目标中,每位患者/代理人和医生都肯定了大约五个目标,但 67.7%的患者/代理人与医生对最重要的医疗目标存在分歧。
MICU 中的患者及其代理人对院内 CPR 及其成功率的了解不足,患者的代码状态偏好可能并不总是反映在代码状态医嘱中,并且患者/代理人和医生对什么是最重要的医疗目标的评估可能存在差异。