Suppr超能文献

[激光散射比浊法。一种更好的方法?]

[Laser nephelometry. A better methodology?].

作者信息

Gaytán-Alcocér M

机构信息

Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, México, D.F.

出版信息

Arch Invest Med (Mex). 1990 Apr-Jun;21(2):79-86.

PMID:2129476
Abstract

Nephelometric assays (LN) are known since several years ago. Laser beam immunonephelometric analysis (He-Ne: 640 nm), are a sophistication of the spectrophotometers. Nephelometry was the first method to make use of narrow-angle light scattering and a laser beam. It was made 2500 +/- 200 determinations of human fluids for IgG, IgA, IgM, C3 and C4, both LN and RID (radial immunodiffusion method). Human patients had the following characteristics: 18-55 years old, both sexes and with different pulmonary pathologies (Bronchial asthma, Bronchitis, Tuberculosis, Emphysema, Fibrosis, Extrinsic allergic alveolitis). We found a greater sensitivity and a shorter analysis time for LN than for RID. On the other hand, Nephelometry gave different values to the radial immunodiffusion method for all the proteins evaluated.

摘要

散射比浊法(LN)多年前就已为人所知。激光束免疫比浊分析(氦氖:640纳米)是分光光度计的一种精密技术。比浊法是最早利用窄角光散射和激光束的方法。对人体体液中的IgG、IgA、IgM、C3和C4进行了2500±200次散射比浊法(LN)和放射免疫扩散法(RID)测定。人类患者具有以下特征:年龄在18至55岁之间,男女皆有,患有不同的肺部疾病(支气管哮喘、支气管炎、肺结核、肺气肿、纤维化、外源性过敏性肺泡炎)。我们发现,与放射免疫扩散法相比,散射比浊法具有更高的灵敏度和更短的分析时间。另一方面,对于所有评估的蛋白质,比浊法给出的值与放射免疫扩散法不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验