• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Q-抗血清SEVAC通过放射免疫扩散法、激光散射比浊法和比浊法进行某些血清蛋白测定的可比性。

Comparability of some serum protein determinations by radial immunodiffusion, laser nephelometric and turbidimetric assays employing Q-antisera SEVAC.

作者信息

Bouzek J, Mancal P

机构信息

Institute of Sera and Vaccines, Prague, Czechoslovakia.

出版信息

J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1989;33(1):105-11.

PMID:2498424
Abstract

Quantitation of IgG, IgA and IgM immunoglobulins and C3, C4 components in human serum samples by the radial immunodiffusion technique and by the nephelometric and turbidimetric assays was compared using the linear regression analysis method. Comparisons of the two methods run in polyethylene glycol showed close agreement between methods and a relatively high degree of correlation between the parameters studied. Compared to the radial immunodiffusion technique, nephelometry and turbidimetry gave good correlation between parameters, but the agreement between tests was worse, especially in the case of C3 component determinations in fresh samples of patients' sera. All tests were carried out using the Q-antisera and Control human serum preparations SEVAC.

摘要

采用线性回归分析方法,比较了用放射免疫扩散技术以及比浊法和散射比浊法对人血清样本中的IgG、IgA和IgM免疫球蛋白以及C3、C4成分进行定量的情况。在聚乙二醇中进行的两种方法的比较显示,方法之间一致性良好,所研究参数之间具有较高的相关性。与放射免疫扩散技术相比,比浊法和散射比浊法在参数之间具有良好的相关性,但检测之间的一致性较差,尤其是在患者血清新鲜样本中C3成分测定的情况下。所有检测均使用Q抗血清和SEVAC人血清对照制剂进行。

相似文献

1
Comparability of some serum protein determinations by radial immunodiffusion, laser nephelometric and turbidimetric assays employing Q-antisera SEVAC.使用Q-抗血清SEVAC通过放射免疫扩散法、激光散射比浊法和比浊法进行某些血清蛋白测定的可比性。
J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1989;33(1):105-11.
2
[Comparison of two methods for measuring human serum immunoglobulins (laser-nephelometry and radial immunodiffusion)].[两种测量人血清免疫球蛋白方法的比较(激光散射比浊法和单向免疫扩散法)]
Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1981 Jan 15;57(1):125-9.
3
Laser nephelometric measurement of seven serum proteins compared with radial immunodiffusion.激光散射比浊法测定七种血清蛋白并与放射免疫扩散法比较。
J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1983 Apr;21(4):217-21. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1983.21.4.217.
4
Evaluation of immunoturbidimetric specific protein methods using the Architect ci8200: comparison with immunonephelometry.使用Architect ci8200评估免疫比浊法特定蛋白检测方法:与免疫散射比浊法的比较
Ann Clin Biochem. 2007 Nov;44(Pt 6):529-36. doi: 10.1258/000456307782268237.
5
Serum immune complexes in erythema nodosum leprosum reactions of leprosy.麻风病中麻风结节性红斑反应的血清免疫复合物
Indian J Lepr. 1988 Apr;60(2):189-95.
6
[Effects of the use of FRIGEN (AG-Ffm-HOECST) on the determination of blood levels of some proteins (IgA, IgM, IgG, C3c, C4) in cord blood of healthy newborn infants at term by laser nephelometry].
Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1984 Sep 30;60(9):1811-7.
7
A comparison of methods of monoclonal immunoglobulin quantitation.单克隆免疫球蛋白定量方法的比较。
Neoplasma. 1985;32(1):31-6.
8
[Study on the determination of IgA, IgG, IgM, a1-antitrypsin, haptoglobin and transferrin with the kinetic nephelometric method. Comparison with the radial immunodiffusion method (author's transl)].用速率散射比浊法测定IgA、IgG、IgM、α1-抗胰蛋白酶、触珠蛋白和转铁蛋白的研究。与放射免疫扩散法的比较(作者译)
Klin Padiatr. 1980 Jul;192(4):370-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035610.
9
[Immunochemical identification of proteins adsorbed on columns of activated charcoal during hemosorption in patients with psoriasis].[银屑病患者血液吸附过程中活性炭柱上吸附蛋白质的免疫化学鉴定]
Vopr Med Khim. 1982 Nov-Dec;28(6):33-7.
10
Immunoprotective factors in breast milk and sera of mother-infant pairs.母婴配对的母乳和血清中的免疫保护因子。
Trop Geogr Med. 1986 Dec;38(4):362-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Peripheral complement proteins in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of serological studies.精神分裂症中的外周补体蛋白:血清学研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Schizophr Res. 2020 Aug;222:58-72. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.05.036. Epub 2020 May 24.