Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2011 Jan 26;6(1):e16159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016159.
The objective of this study was to compare the blood pool agent Gadomer with a small contrast agent for the visualization of ultra-small, collateral arteries (diameter<1 mm) with high resolution steady-state MR angiography (SS-MRA) in a rabbit hind limb ischemia model. Ten rabbits underwent unilateral femoral artery ligation. On days 14 and 21, high resolution SS-MRA (voxel size 0.49×0.49×0.50 mm(3)) was performed on a 3 Tesla clinical system after administration of either Gadomer (dose: 0.10 mmol/kg) or a small contrast agent (gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA), dose: 0.20 mmol/kg). All animals received both contrast agents on separate days. Selective intra-arterial x-ray angiograms (XRAs) were obtained in the ligated limb as a reference. The number of collaterals was counted by two independent observers. Image quality was evaluated with the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the femoral artery and collateral arteries. CNR for Gadomer was higher in both the femoral artery (Gadomer: 73±5 (mean ± SE); Gd-DTPA: 40±3; p<0.01) and collateral arteries (Gadomer: 18±4; Gd-DTPA: 9±1; p = 0.04). Neither day of acquisition nor contrast agent used influenced the number of identified collateral arteries (p = 0.30 and p = 0.14, respectively). An average of 4.5±1.0 (day 14, mean ± SD) and 5.3±1.2 (day 21) collaterals was found, which was comparable to XRA (5.6±1.7, averaged over days 14 and 21; p>0.10). Inter-observer variation was 24% and 18% for Gadomer and Gd-DTPA, respectively. In conclusion, blood pool agent Gadomer improved vessel conspicuity compared to Gd-DTPA. Steady-state MRA can be considered as an excellent non-invasive alternative to intra-arterial XRA for the visualization of ultra-small collateral arteries.
本研究旨在比较血池造影剂钆美胺与小对比剂在兔后肢缺血模型中超小侧支动脉(直径<1mm)的高分辨率稳态磁共振血管造影(SS-MRA)中的应用。10 只兔子行单侧股动脉结扎。在第 14 天和第 21 天,在 3T 临床系统上进行高分辨率 SS-MRA(体素大小 0.49×0.49×0.50mm3),分别给予钆美胺(剂量:0.10mmol/kg)或小对比剂(钆喷替酸葡甲胺(Gd-DTPA),剂量:0.20mmol/kg)。所有动物均在不同天接受两种对比剂。在结扎肢体上获得选择性动脉 X 射线血管造影(XRA)作为参考。由两位独立观察者计数侧支血管的数量。通过股动脉和侧支动脉的对比噪声比(CNR)评估图像质量。股动脉和侧支动脉的钆美胺 CNR 均较高(股动脉:Gadomer:73±5(平均值±SE);Gd-DTPA:40±3;p<0.01)。采集日和使用的对比剂均不影响识别的侧支动脉数量(分别为 p=0.30 和 p=0.14)。分别在第 14 天和第 21 天平均发现 4.5±1.0(平均值±SD)和 5.3±1.2 条侧支血管,与 XRA(第 14 和第 21 天平均 5.6±1.7;p>0.10)相当。钆美胺和 Gd-DTPA 的观察者间变异分别为 24%和 18%。总之,与 Gd-DTPA 相比,血池造影剂钆美胺可提高血管显影。稳态 MRA 可作为显示超小侧支动脉的动脉内 XRA 的极好的无创替代方法。