Han Jin-Song, Wang Hui-Shan, Yan De-Min, Wang Zeng-Wei, Han Hong-Guang, Zhu Hong-Yu, Li Xin-Min
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Acta Cardiol. 2010 Dec;65(6):639-44. doi: 10.1080/ac.65.6.2059860.
Pretreatment with diazoxide, a mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium channel (mito KATP) opener, was found to protect the rat heart against ischaemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury by mimicking ischaemic preconditioning (IPC). However, the protection mechanisms have not been fully clarified yet.We hypothesize that molecular regulation of mitochondrial energetics is integral to this cardioprotective programme. We explored the involvement of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1-1alpha (PGC-1alpha) in the effect of IPC and diazoxide preconditioning (DPC) with regard to its role in protection against I/R injury.
30 Wistar rats were used to establish the Langendorff isolated perfused heart model. Rats were randomly divided into 5 groups, 6 in each group: (1) the I/R group: after 30 min of equilibration perfusion, the heart was subjected to 30 min of ischaemia and 1 h of reperfusion; (2) the IPC group: after 10 min of equilibration perfusion, the heart was subjected to two times 5 min ischaemia and 5 min of reperfusion, followed by 30 min of ischaemia and 1 h of reperfusion; (3) the DPC group: after 10 min of equilibration perfusion, the heart was given two times a K-H perfusion solution containing diazoxide (100 micromol/l) for 5 min then a non-diazoxide K-H perfusion solution for 5 min, followed by 30 min of ischaemia and 1 h of reperfusion; (4) a blank control group: an equal amount of saline was used instead of diazoxide. The perfusion procedure was the same as in the DPC group; (5) the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) group: DMSO was applied instead of diazoxide, and the perfusion procedure was the same as in the DPC group. Cardiac apex muscle was cut for frozen section. Immunohistochemistry staining of PGC-1alpha was performed and average absorbance was calculated. An electron microscope was used for Flameng scoring of the myocardial mitochondria.
The average absorbance values of PGC-1alpha were: I/R group (3.88 +/- 1.72), IPC group (10.94 +/- 5.23), DPC group (8.40 +/- 3.64), blank control group (3.55 +/- 1.56) and DMSO group (4.16 +/- 0.52), respectively. The expression of PGC- 1alpha was significantly increased in the IPC and DPC groups and the differences were statistically significant compared to the I/R, blank control and DMSO groups, i.e., P < 0.01 for IPC group and P < 0.05 for DPC group. However, there was no significant difference between the IPC and DPC groups (P > 0.05). Flameng score: IPC group (0.44 +/- 0.13), DPC group (0.47 +/- 0.10), I/R group (1.78 +/- 0.14), blank control group (1.70 +/- 0.03) and DMSO group (1.68 +/- 0.06). The Flameng score of the IPC and DPC groups was statistically significantly different as compared to the I/R group, blank control group and DMSO group (P < 0.01), but no significant difference was detected between the IPC and DPC groups (P > 0.05).
IPC and DPC have a protective effect on myocardial mitochondria, and their mechanism of action may be related to activation and over-expression of PGC-1alpha.
二氮嗪是一种线粒体ATP敏感性钾通道(mito KATP)开放剂,前期研究发现,它通过模拟缺血预处理(IPC)对大鼠心脏起到抗缺血再灌注(I/R)损伤的保护作用。然而,其保护机制尚未完全阐明。我们推测线粒体能量代谢的分子调控是这一心脏保护程序的核心。我们探讨了过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ辅激活因子-1-1α(PGC-1α)在IPC和二氮嗪预处理(DPC)抗I/R损伤作用中的参与情况。
采用30只Wistar大鼠建立Langendorff离体灌注心脏模型。大鼠随机分为5组,每组6只:(1)I/R组:平衡灌注30分钟后,心脏经历30分钟缺血和1小时再灌注;(2)IPC组:平衡灌注10分钟后,心脏经历两次5分钟缺血和5分钟再灌注,随后30分钟缺血和1小时再灌注;(3)DPC组:平衡灌注10分钟后,心脏两次给予含二氮嗪(100微摩尔/升)的K-H灌注液5分钟,然后给予不含二氮嗪的K-H灌注液5分钟,随后30分钟缺血和1小时再灌注;(4)空白对照组:用等量生理盐水代替二氮嗪。灌注程序与DPC组相同;(5)二甲基亚砜(DMSO)组:用DMSO代替二氮嗪,灌注程序与DPC组相同。取心脏尖部肌肉做冰冻切片。进行PGC-1α的免疫组织化学染色并计算平均吸光度。用电子显微镜对心肌线粒体进行Flameng评分。
PGC-1α的平均吸光度值分别为:I/R组(3.88±1.72)、IPC组(10.94±5.23)、DPC组(8.40±3.64)、空白对照组(3.55±1.56)和DMSO组(4.16±0.52)。PGC-1α的表达在IPC组和DPC组显著增加,与I/R组、空白对照组和DMSO组相比差异有统计学意义,即IPC组P<0.01,DPC组P<0.05。然而,IPC组和DPC组之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。Flameng评分:IPC组(0.44±0.13)、DPC组(0.47±0.10)、I/R组(1.78±0.14)、空白对照组(1.70±0.03)和DMSO组(1.68±0.06)。IPC组和DPC组的Flameng评分与I/R组、空白对照组和DMSO组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),但IPC组和DPC组之间未检测到显著差异(P>0.05)。
IPC和DPC对心肌线粒体有保护作用,其作用机制可能与PGC-1α的激活和过表达有关。