• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤患者格拉斯哥昏迷评分 8 分或更低者的院外气道管理与结局的关系。

The relationship between out-of-hospital airway management and outcome among trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale Scores of 8 or less.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, UCSD Center for Resuscitation Science, San Diego, California 92103-8676, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):184-92. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.545473. Epub 2011 Feb 10.

DOI:10.3109/10903127.2010.545473
PMID:21309705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4091894/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Airway management remains a fundamental component of optimal care of the severely injured patient, with endotracheal intubation representing the definitive strategy for airway control. However, multiple studies document an association between out-of-hospital intubation and increased mortality for severe traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the relationship between out-of-hospital intubation attempts and outcome among trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores ≤ 8 across sites participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC).

METHODS

The ROC Epistry-Trauma, an epidemiologic database of prehospital encounters with critically injured trauma victims, was used to identify emergency medical services (EMS)-treated patients with GCS scores ≤ 8. Multiple logistic regression was used to explore the association between intubation attempts and vital status at discharge, adjusting for the following covariates: age, gender, GCS score, hypotension, mechanism of injury, and ROC site. Sites were then stratified by frequency of intubation attempts and chi-square test for trend was used to associate the frequency of intubation attempts with outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 1,555 patients were included in this analysis; intubation was attempted in 758 of these. Patients in whom intubation was attempted had higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.13-3.98, p < 0.01). However, sites with higher rates of attempted intubation had lower mortality across all trauma victims with GCS scores ≤ 8 (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.15-1.72, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in whom intubation is attempted have higher adjusted mortality. However, sites with a higher rate of attempted intubation have lower adjusted mortality across the entire cohort of trauma patients with GCS scores ≤ 8. Coma Scale score.

摘要

背景

气道管理仍然是严重受伤患者最佳护理的基本组成部分,气管插管是控制气道的明确策略。然而,多项研究记录了在院外进行插管与严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率增加之间存在关联。

目的

探讨在参与复苏结果联盟(ROC)的各站点中,格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)≤8 的创伤患者的院外插管尝试与结局之间的关系。

方法

ROC Epistry-Trauma 是一个包含了危重伤员院前遭遇的流行病学数据库,利用该数据库来识别接受紧急医疗服务(EMS)治疗且 GCS 评分≤8 的患者。采用多变量逻辑回归来探索插管尝试与出院时存活状态之间的关联,调整了以下协变量:年龄、性别、GCS 评分、低血压、损伤机制和 ROC 站点。然后根据插管尝试的频率对站点进行分层,并采用趋势卡方检验来关联插管尝试的频率与结局。

结果

共有 1555 例患者纳入了此项分析,其中 758 例患者尝试了插管。尝试插管的患者死亡率更高(校正比值比[OR]2.91,95%置信区间[CI]2.13-3.98,p<0.01)。然而,在所有 GCS 评分≤8 的创伤患者中,尝试插管率较高的站点死亡率更低(OR 1.40,95%CI1.15-1.72,p<0.01)。

结论

尝试插管的患者校正死亡率更高。然而,在 GCS 评分≤8 的所有创伤患者整个队列中,尝试插管率较高的站点校正死亡率更低。昏迷评分。

相似文献

1
The relationship between out-of-hospital airway management and outcome among trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale Scores of 8 or less.创伤性脑损伤患者格拉斯哥昏迷评分 8 分或更低者的院外气道管理与结局的关系。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):184-92. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2010.545473. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
2
The association between field Glasgow Coma Scale score and outcome in patients undergoing paramedic rapid sequence intubation.接受护理人员快速顺序插管患者的现场格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分与预后的关系。
J Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;29(4):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.04.012.
3
Intubation patterns and outcomes in patients with computed tomography-verified traumatic brain injury.计算机断层扫描证实的创伤性脑损伤患者的插管模式及预后
J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1615-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822a30a1.
4
The predictive value of field versus arrival Glasgow Coma Scale score and TRISS calculations in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.现场与入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分及创伤和损伤严重度评分计算在中重度创伤性脑损伤中的预测价值。
J Trauma. 2006 May;60(5):985-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000205860.96209.1c.
5
The impact of prehospital endotracheal intubation on outcome in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.院前气管插管对中重度创伤性脑损伤患者预后的影响。
J Trauma. 2005 May;58(5):933-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000162731.53812.58.
6
The impact of aeromedical response to patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.航空医疗救援对中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Aug;46(2):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.01.024.
7
Prehospital airway and ventilation management: a trauma score and injury severity score-based analysis.院前气道与通气管理:基于创伤评分和损伤严重程度评分的分析
J Trauma. 2010 Aug;69(2):294-301. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181dc6c7f.
8
Should trauma patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 be intubated prior to hospital arrival?创伤患者格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)为 3 分,在送达医院前是否应插管?
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(6):541-6. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00008736.
9
[Emergency anesthesia, airway management and ventilation in major trauma. Background and key messages of the interdisciplinary S3 guidelines for major trauma patients].[重大创伤中的急诊麻醉、气道管理与通气。重大创伤患者跨学科S3指南的背景与关键信息]
Anaesthesist. 2011 Nov;60(11):1027-40. doi: 10.1007/s00101-011-1957-1.
10
Transfusion of red blood cells in patients with a prehospital Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less and no evidence of shock is associated with worse outcomes.院前格拉斯哥昏迷评分 8 分或更低且无休克证据的患者输注红细胞与预后更差相关。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):8-14; discussion 14. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318298492e.

引用本文的文献

1
Damage to the Endotracheal Tube Caused by Incessant Biting by an Unconscious Patient After Stroke: A Case Report.中风后无意识患者持续咬气管插管所致损伤:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Jul 28;16(7):e65599. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65599. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Analysis of the primary utilization of videolaryngoscopy in prehospital emergency care in Germany.德国院前急救中视频喉镜的主要应用分析。
Anaesthesiologie. 2023 Apr;72(4):245-252. doi: 10.1007/s00101-022-01247-z. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
3
Establishing quality indicators for pre-hospital advanced airway management: a modified nominal group technique consensus process.建立院前高级气道管理的质量指标:改良名义群体技术共识过程。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Feb;128(2):e143-e150. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.031. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Comparison of manual statements from out-of-hospital trauma training programs and a national guideline on treatment of patients with severe and multiple injuries.院外创伤培训项目的人工陈述与重度和多发伤患者治疗国家指南的比较。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Jun;48(3):2207-2217. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01768-z. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
5
Anesthetic considerations for extracranial injuries in patients with associated brain trauma.伴有脑外伤患者颅外损伤的麻醉注意事项
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jul-Sep;35(3):302-311. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_278_18.
6
Prehospital Intubation and Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury-Assessing Intervention Efficacy in a Modern Trauma Cohort.创伤性脑损伤的院前气管插管与预后——评估现代创伤队列中的干预效果
Front Neurol. 2018 Apr 10;9:194. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00194. eCollection 2018.
7
Prehospital intubation for isolated severe blunt traumatic brain injury: worse outcomes and higher mortality.单纯严重钝性创伤性脑损伤的院前气管插管:预后更差且死亡率更高。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Dec;43(6):731-739. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0718-x. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
8
[No improved survival rate in severely injured patients by prehospital intubation : A retrospective data analysis and matched-pair analysis].[院前气管插管对重伤患者生存率无改善作用:一项回顾性数据分析和配对分析]
Unfallchirurg. 2016 Apr;119(4):314-22. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0116-6.
9
Update on the 2012 guidelines for the management of pediatric traumatic brain injury - information for the anesthesiologist.2012年小儿创伤性脑损伤管理指南更新——给麻醉医师的信息
Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Jul;24(7):703-10. doi: 10.1111/pan.12415. Epub 2014 May 12.
10
Advances in prehospital airway management.院前气道管理的进展。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Jan;4(1):57-64. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.128014.

本文引用的文献

1
Both hypoxemia and extreme hyperoxemia may be detrimental in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.低氧血症和极度高氧血症在严重创伤性脑损伤患者中可能都是有害的。
J Neurotrauma. 2009 Dec;26(12):2217-23. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.0940.
2
The impact of rapid sequence intubation on trauma patient mortality in attempted prehospital intubation.院前气管插管尝试中快速顺序诱导插管对创伤患者死亡率的影响。
J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.01.022. Epub 2008 Sep 14.
3
The Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Trauma: design, development, and implementation of a North American epidemiologic prehospital trauma registry.复苏结局联盟创伤登记处:北美院前创伤流行病学登记处的设计、开发与实施
Resuscitation. 2008 Aug;78(2):170-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.01.029. Epub 2008 May 15.
4
Should invasive airway management be done in the field?是否应在现场进行侵入性气道管理?
CMAJ. 2008 Apr 22;178(9):1171-3. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080234.
5
The OPALS Major Trauma Study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity.OPALS 重大创伤研究:高级生命支持对生存和发病率的影响。
CMAJ. 2008 Apr 22;178(9):1141-52. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.071154.
6
Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury 2nd edition.《创伤性脑损伤院前管理指南》第2版
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2008;12 Suppl 1:S1-52. doi: 10.1080/10903120701732052.
7
A descriptive analysis of Emergency Medical Service Systems participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) network.对参与复苏结果联盟(ROC)网络的紧急医疗服务系统的描述性分析。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007 Oct-Dec;11(4):369-82. doi: 10.1080/10903120701537147.
8
The impact of prehospital ventilation on outcome after severe traumatic brain injury.院前通气对重度创伤性脑损伤后结局的影响。
J Trauma. 2007 Jun;62(6):1330-6; discussion 1336-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31804a8032.
9
Prehospital hypoxia affects outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury: a prospective multicenter study.院前低氧血症影响创伤性脑损伤患者的预后:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
J Trauma. 2006 Nov;61(5):1134-41. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196644.64653.d8.
10
Predictors of intubation success and therapeutic value of paramedic airway management in a large, urban EMS system.大型城市急救医疗服务(EMS)系统中气管插管成功的预测因素及护理人员气道管理的治疗价值
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006 Jul-Sep;10(3):356-62. doi: 10.1080/10903120600725751.