Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Neurosurgery. 2011 Jun;68(6):1568-75; discussion 1575. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820cd16a.
Several authors have reported results obtained with the microendoscopic diskectomy (MED) technique, but the long-term outcome has not been described. This report summarizes our clinical experience with the lumbar MED technique with a long-term follow-up period.
To evaluate the efficacy of the MED for lumbar disk herniation and to report long-term outcome and complications (5-year follow-up).
One hundred twenty consecutive patients with lumbar disk herniation were treated with the METRx system.We included all types of lumbar herniated disks: contained, not contained, foraminal, and migrated disk herniations. The results were evaluated with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, Oswestry Disability Index score, patient satisfaction questionnaire, and modified Macnab criteria.
The average age of patients was 41 years; 65 were men and 55 were women. The most commonly affected level was L5-S1 (54.2%). The follow-up time after surgery was 5 years in all cases. We obtained good or excellent results in 75% of patients and regular results in 18%. Good subjective satisfaction was observed with surgery in 92% of patients. The mean decrease in the Oswestry Disability Index score was 52.8 ± 21.6; the mean decrease in leg VAS score was 6.1 ± 2.3; and the mean decrease in lumbar VAS score was 1.9 ± 3.3. Adjusted mean differences were statistically significant in all cases (P < .05).
MED not only reduces the incision, tissue damage, and postoperative period of incapacity but also offers long-term results comparable to those of conventional techniques.
多位作者报道了使用微创经皮内镜椎间盘切除术(MED)技术获得的结果,但尚未描述长期结果。本报告总结了我们使用腰椎 MED 技术的临床经验,并进行了长期随访。
评估 MED 治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效,并报告长期结果和并发症(5 年随访)。
120 例腰椎间盘突出症患者接受了 METRx 系统治疗。我们纳入了所有类型的腰椎间盘突出症:包容性、非包容性、椎间孔型和游离型椎间盘突出症。使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、Oswestry 残疾指数评分、患者满意度问卷和改良 Macnab 标准评估结果。
患者的平均年龄为 41 岁;男性 65 例,女性 55 例。最常受累的节段是 L5-S1(54.2%)。所有病例的术后随访时间均为 5 年。75%的患者获得良好或优秀结果,18%的患者获得一般结果。92%的患者对手术的主观满意度较好。Oswestry 残疾指数评分平均下降 52.8±21.6;腿部 VAS 评分平均下降 6.1±2.3;腰椎 VAS 评分平均下降 1.9±3.3。所有病例的平均差值均具有统计学意义(P<.05)。
MED 不仅减少了切口、组织损伤和术后无能力期,而且提供了与传统技术相当的长期结果。