Catalano R F, Hawkins J D, Wells E A, Miller J, Brewer D
Social Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle 98115.
Int J Addict. 1990;25(9A-10A):1085-140. doi: 10.3109/10826089109081039.
A review of controlled evaluations of adolescent and other drug abuse treatment programs concludes that some treatment is better than no treatment, that few comparisons of treatment method have consistently demonstrated the superiority of one method over another, that posttreatment relapse rates are high, and that more controlled studies of adolescent treatment which allow evaluation of the elements of treatment are needed. In the absence of the clear superiority of specific treatment techniques, it is suggested that examination of factors related to relapse can provide an empirical base for identifying effective treatment approaches. Pretreatment, during-treatment, and posttreatment factors related to relapse are reviewed from existing studies of adolescent treatment. Program components are suggested which have been associated with or hold promise for reducing factors associated with higher relapse rates and increasing factors associated with lower relapse rates.
有治疗总比没有治疗好;很少有治疗方法的比较能始终如一地证明一种方法优于另一种方法;治疗后复发率很高;需要更多可对治疗要素进行评估的青少年治疗对照研究。在缺乏特定治疗技术明显优势的情况下,有人提出,对与复发相关的因素进行研究可为确定有效的治疗方法提供实证依据。从现有的青少年治疗研究中回顾了与复发相关的治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后因素。文中提出了一些项目组成部分,这些部分与降低高复发率相关因素及增加低复发率相关因素有关联或有望做到这一点。