Burd Andrew
Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong.
Indian J Plast Surg. 2010 Sep;43(Suppl):S11-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.70717.
There have been tremendous advances in burns care over the past 50 years. Much of this, but not all, can be attributed to basic science and clinically related research. Out of the best centres in the world, centres that are fully funded and richly resourced, best practice guidelines result in impressive outcomes not only in terms of survival but also in terms of a quality of survival. Indeed the remaining clinical challenges in these centres are the elderly, the inhalational burns, and the very extensive burns. There are however other challenges when looking at burns care in a global context and in particular is the provision of even minimal standards of acceptable care for burns patients in many parts of the world. Whilst the justification for research funding in the wealthy countries becomes increasingly esoteric, for example looking at the immunology of face transplantation, the global health challenges of burns care still remain. Perhaps, the greatest research challenge in burns care in the 21st century lies not in furthering our understanding of the phenomenon we observe but the global application of the knowledge we already possess.
在过去50年里,烧伤护理取得了巨大进展。其中大部分(但并非全部)可归因于基础科学和临床相关研究。在世界上资源充足且资金雄厚的顶尖中心,最佳实践指南不仅在生存率方面,而且在生存质量方面都产生了令人瞩目的成果。事实上,这些中心目前尚存的临床挑战在于老年患者、吸入性烧伤患者以及大面积烧伤患者。然而,从全球范围来看,烧伤护理还面临其他挑战,尤其是在世界许多地区,为烧伤患者提供哪怕是最低标准的可接受护理。虽然富裕国家研究资金的用途越来越晦涩难懂,例如面部移植免疫学研究,但烧伤护理的全球健康挑战依然存在。也许,21世纪烧伤护理领域最大的研究挑战不在于加深我们对所观察现象的理解,而在于将我们已掌握的知识应用到全球范围。