Suppr超能文献

比较生物反馈疗法与球囊辅助训练治疗排便协同失调的疗效。

Comparing the efficacy of biofeedback and balloon-assisted training in the treatment of dyssynergic defecation.

作者信息

Pourmomeny Abbs Ali, Emami Mohammad Hassan, Amooshahi Mahboobeh, Adibi Peyman

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;25(2):89-92. doi: 10.1155/2011/268062.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dyssynergic defecation does not respond appropriately to routine treatments for constipation. Recently, research has shown that biofeedback therapy is useful in anorectal dyssynergia.

OBJECTIVE

To compare two treatment modalities for patients experiencing dyssynergic defecation.

METHODS

Sixty-five subjects with dyssynergic defecation were recruited and randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups: balloon defecation training and biofeedback therapy. In the first group, a balloon was inserted into the rectum and inflated by water injection so that the patient experienced the sensation of a full rectum and, thus, the need to defecate. The patient was subsequently asked to reject the balloon. In the biofeedback group, the pen electrode of an electromyographic biofeedback device was inserted into the rectum, with the patient subsequently being asked to increase abdominal pressure and relax the rectal muscles accordingly.

RESULTS

The findings showed a reduction in constipation in both groups. The ability to reject the balloon (volume and time) was significantly better in postintervention measurements; however, better results were found in the biofeedback arm of the study. Patient satisfaction after treatment reached 52% with balloon training and 79% in the biofeedback group. Reports of incomplete evacuation and the need for digit use during defecation remained constant after treatment in balloon-trained patients.

CONCLUSION

Biofeedback training appeared to be superior to balloon defecation training and resulted in measurable changes in subjective and objective variables of dyssynergia.

摘要

背景

排便协同失调对便秘的常规治疗反应不佳。最近的研究表明,生物反馈疗法在肛门直肠协同失调中是有用的。

目的

比较两种治疗排便协同失调患者的方法。

方法

招募65名排便协同失调的受试者,并随机分配到两个治疗组之一:球囊排便训练和生物反馈疗法。在第一组中,将一个球囊插入直肠并通过注水使其膨胀,以便患者体验直肠充盈的感觉,从而产生排便的需求。随后要求患者排出球囊。在生物反馈组中,将肌电图生物反馈设备的笔式电极插入直肠,随后要求患者相应地增加腹压并放松直肠肌肉。

结果

研究结果显示两组便秘情况均有所减轻。干预后测量中排出球囊的能力(容量和时间)明显更好;然而,研究的生物反馈组效果更佳。球囊训练后患者满意度达到52%,生物反馈组为79%。在接受球囊训练的患者中,治疗后排便不完全排空和排便时需要用手指辅助的情况保持不变。

结论

生物反馈训练似乎优于球囊排便训练,并导致协同失调的主观和客观变量出现可测量的变化。

相似文献

2
Home-based versus office-based biofeedback therapy for constipation with dyssynergic defecation: a randomised controlled trial.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;3(11):768-777. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30266-8. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
3
Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Mar;5(3):331-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.023.
4
Biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation.
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov 28;12(44):7069-74. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i44.7069.
5
Predictive capability of anorectal physiologic tests for unfavorable outcomes following biofeedback therapy in dyssynergic defecation.
J Korean Med Sci. 2010 Jul;25(7):1060-5. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.7.1060. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
7
Effect of biofeedback therapy on anorectal physiological parameters among patients with fecal evacuation disorder.
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar;36(2):99-104. doi: 10.1007/s12664-017-0731-y. Epub 2017 Feb 18.
8
Effectiveness of Biofeedback Therapy on Quality of Life in Patients with Dyssynergic Defecation Disorder.
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan;32(1):22-29. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2020.19678.
9
Outcome of biofeedback therapy in dyssynergic defecation patients with and without irritable bowel syndrome.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Aug;45(7):593-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31820c6001.

引用本文的文献

1
2022 Seoul Consensus on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Functional Constipation.
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Jul 30;29(3):271-305. doi: 10.5056/jnm23066.
2
Dyssynergic Defecation: A Comprehensive Review on Diagnosis and Management.
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar;34(3):182-195. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22148.
3
A Practical Guide to Biofeedback Therapy for Pelvic Floor Disorders.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2019 Apr 23;21(5):21. doi: 10.1007/s11894-019-0688-3.
4
Biofeedback treatment of chronic constipation: myths and misconceptions.
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Sep;20(9):611-8. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1507-6. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
5
Biofeedback-guided pelvic floor exercise therapy for obstructive defecation: an effective alternative.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 21;20(27):9162-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.9162.
6
Understanding and treating refractory constipation.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2014 May 6;5(2):77-85. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i2.77.
7
Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD002111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002111.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Biofeedback for anismus: has placebo effect been overlooked?
Colorectal Dis. 1999 Mar;1(2):80-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.1999.00019.x.
3
Functional anorectal disorders.
Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1510-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.064.
4
5
Biofeedback treatment for functional anorectal disorders: a comprehensive efficacy review.
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2004 Sep;29(3):153-74. doi: 10.1023/b:apbi.0000039055.18609.64.
6
Dyssynergic defecation: demographics, symptoms, stool patterns, and quality of life.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;38(8):680-5. doi: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000135929.78074.8c.
7
Biofeedback for pelvic floor dysfunction in constipation.
BMJ. 2004 Feb 14;328(7436):393-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.393.
9
Obstructed defecation.
Colorectal Dis. 2003 Jul;5(4):280-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00497.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验