Bassotti Gabrio, Blandizzi Corrado
Gabrio Bassotti, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, 06156 Perugia, Italy.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2014 May 6;5(2):77-85. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i2.77.
Chronic constipation is a frequently encountered disorder in clinical practice. Most constipated patients benefit from standard medical approaches. However, current therapies may fail in a proportion of patients. These patients deserve better evaluation and thorough investigations before their labeling as refractory to treatment. Indeed, several cases of apparent refractoriness are actually due to misconceptions about constipation, poor basal evaluation (inability to recognize secondary causes of constipation, use of constipating drugs) or inadequate therapeutic regimens. After a careful re-evaluation that takes into account the above factors, a certain percentage of patients can be defined as being actually resistant to first-line medical treatments. These subjects should firstly undergo specific diagnostic examination to ascertain the subtype of constipation. The subsequent therapeutic approach should be then tailored according to their underlying dysfunction. Slow transit patients could benefit from a more robust medical treatment, based on stimulant laxatives (or their combination with osmotic laxatives, particularly over the short-term), enterokinetics (such as prucalopride) or secretagogues (such as lubiprostone or linaclotide). Patients complaining of obstructed defecation are less likely to show a response to medical treatment and might benefit from biofeedback, when available. When all medical treatments prove to be unsatisfactory, other approaches may be attempted in selected patients (sacral neuromodulation, local injection of botulinum toxin, anterograde continence enemas), although with largely unpredictable outcomes. A further although irreversible step is surgery (subtotal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or stapled transanal rectal resection), which may confer some benefit to a few patients with refractoriness to medical treatments.
慢性便秘是临床实践中常见的一种疾病。大多数便秘患者可从标准的医学治疗方法中获益。然而,目前的治疗方法在一部分患者中可能会失败。在将这些患者标记为难治性便秘之前,他们值得进行更好的评估和全面的检查。事实上,一些看似难治的病例实际上是由于对便秘的误解、基础评估不足(无法识别便秘的继发原因、使用导致便秘的药物)或治疗方案不充分。在仔细重新评估并考虑上述因素后,一定比例的患者可被定义为实际上对一线医学治疗耐药。这些患者首先应接受特定的诊断检查以确定便秘的亚型。随后的治疗方法应根据其潜在的功能障碍进行调整。慢传输型便秘患者可能从更积极的医学治疗中获益,这种治疗基于刺激性泻药(或其与渗透性泻药的联合使用,尤其是在短期内)、促肠动力药(如普芦卡必利)或促分泌剂(如鲁比前列酮或利那洛肽)。主诉排便梗阻的患者对医学治疗的反应较小,如有条件,可能从生物反馈治疗中获益。当所有医学治疗均被证明不满意时,对于部分患者可尝试其他方法(骶神经调节、局部注射肉毒杆菌毒素、顺行性节制灌肠),尽管其结果在很大程度上不可预测。更进一步但不可逆转的步骤是手术(全结肠切除回直肠吻合术或吻合器经肛门直肠切除术),这可能会使少数难治性医学治疗的患者获益。