Yokoyama K, Araki S, Kawakami N, Tkakeshita T
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo.
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1990 Nov;37(11):913-8.
The POMS (Profile of Mood States) was translated into Japanese, and reliability and validity of the Japanese edition was assessed on 354 healthy males aged 20 to 59 years (mean 42). The following findings were obtained. 1) Reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) were 0.779-0.926 for six mood scales measured by the Japanese edition, i.e. "Depression-Dejection", "Vigor", "Anger-Hostility", "Fatigue", "Tension-Anxiety" and "Confusion." 2) Five factors were extracted by factor analysis for the 65 items of the POMS. "Vigor" and "Anger-Hostility" were solely explained by their respective factors, indicating that these two scales had the highest factorial validity. "Fatigue" had the second highest factorial validity; and "Tension-Anxiety" was third. "Confusion" and "Depression-Dejection" were related to the same one factor. 3) In 33 of the subjects, the scores for mood measured by the POMS were significantly correlated to ratings by a psychiatrist, indicating that the POMS had good criterion-related validity, except for "Anger-Hostility".
将情绪状态剖面图（POMS）翻译成日语，并对354名年龄在20至59岁（平均42岁）的健康男性进行了日语版的信效度评估。得出以下结果：1）日语版测量的六个情绪量表，即“抑郁-沮丧”、“活力”、“愤怒-敌意”、“疲劳”、“紧张-焦虑”和“困惑”的信度系数（克朗巴哈系数）为0.779至0.926。2）对POMS的65个项目进行因子分析，提取出五个因子。“活力”和“愤怒-敌意”仅由各自的因子解释，表明这两个量表具有最高的因子效度。“疲劳”的因子效度次之；“紧张-焦虑”排第三。“困惑”和“抑郁-沮丧”与同一个因子相关。3）在33名受试者中，POMS测量的情绪得分与精神科医生的评分显著相关，表明POMS除“愤怒-敌意”外具有良好的效标关联效度。
